将软件架构演进工具开发为插件的挑战

Jeffrey M. Barnes, D. Garlan
{"title":"将软件架构演进工具开发为插件的挑战","authors":"Jeffrey M. Barnes, D. Garlan","doi":"10.1109/TOPI.2013.6597188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research has developed a theoretical basis for providing software architects with better support for planning and carrying out major evolutions of software systems. However, these theoretical models have yet to be implemented in a complete, integrated tool. In this paper, we consider some of the challenges involved in developing such a tool as a plug-in to an existing architecture modeling framework. We present an experience report based on the development of a prototype architecture evolution tool as a plug-in to MagicDraw, a commercial UML tool. We find that there are many practical obstacles to developing tools for architecture evolution modeling as plug-ins, and we discuss some of the key factors that plug-in developers should weigh when considering frameworks.","PeriodicalId":274157,"journal":{"name":"2013 3rd International Workshop on Developing Tools as Plug-Ins (TOPI)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in developing a software architecture evolution tool as a plug-in\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey M. Barnes, D. Garlan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TOPI.2013.6597188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent research has developed a theoretical basis for providing software architects with better support for planning and carrying out major evolutions of software systems. However, these theoretical models have yet to be implemented in a complete, integrated tool. In this paper, we consider some of the challenges involved in developing such a tool as a plug-in to an existing architecture modeling framework. We present an experience report based on the development of a prototype architecture evolution tool as a plug-in to MagicDraw, a commercial UML tool. We find that there are many practical obstacles to developing tools for architecture evolution modeling as plug-ins, and we discuss some of the key factors that plug-in developers should weigh when considering frameworks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 3rd International Workshop on Developing Tools as Plug-Ins (TOPI)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 3rd International Workshop on Developing Tools as Plug-Ins (TOPI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TOPI.2013.6597188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 3rd International Workshop on Developing Tools as Plug-Ins (TOPI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TOPI.2013.6597188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

最近的研究已经发展了一个理论基础,为软件架构师提供更好的支持,以规划和执行软件系统的主要演进。然而,这些理论模型还没有在一个完整的、集成的工具中实现。在本文中,我们将考虑在开发这样一个工具(作为现有体系结构建模框架的插件)时所涉及的一些挑战。我们提出了一份基于原型架构演化工具开发的经验报告,该工具作为商业UML工具MagicDraw的插件。我们发现,开发用于架构演化建模为插件的工具存在许多实际障碍,并且我们讨论了插件开发人员在考虑框架时应该权衡的一些关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges in developing a software architecture evolution tool as a plug-in
Recent research has developed a theoretical basis for providing software architects with better support for planning and carrying out major evolutions of software systems. However, these theoretical models have yet to be implemented in a complete, integrated tool. In this paper, we consider some of the challenges involved in developing such a tool as a plug-in to an existing architecture modeling framework. We present an experience report based on the development of a prototype architecture evolution tool as a plug-in to MagicDraw, a commercial UML tool. We find that there are many practical obstacles to developing tools for architecture evolution modeling as plug-ins, and we discuss some of the key factors that plug-in developers should weigh when considering frameworks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信