包容性艺术:(重新)定义共享的邻里空间

Giovanni Maria Bianchi, Ziloy Croughs, Elise Descheemaeker, A. Mier, A. A. Pacific, A. Van Der Stighelen, M. Van Espen, L. Wirla, H. Vrebos, K. Hannes
{"title":"包容性艺术:(重新)定义共享的邻里空间","authors":"Giovanni Maria Bianchi, Ziloy Croughs, Elise Descheemaeker, A. Mier, A. A. Pacific, A. Van Der Stighelen, M. Van Espen, L. Wirla, H. Vrebos, K. Hannes","doi":"10.11116/tdi2021.5.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cities and dense urban areas are dynamic environments, always adapting to changing circumstances and shocks, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Vaartkom, a neighbourhood in Leuven, provides an interesting case-study, having undergone a drastic transformation in the past two decades,\n from dilapidated industrial zone to residential quarter and cultural hot-spot. This has introduced a demographic shift, which inevitably influences the use of public and private space in the neighbourhood, creating new areas for inclusion and exclusion. Our research focuses on how the use\n of public space has changed under COVID-19, and how community members envision their neighbourhood in a post-COVID context. We employed various methods – such as interviews, site visits, stakeholder and physical mapping exercises – and worked with the community to identify the\n different areas of in-and exclusivity. Some findings relate to the conflicting expectations about the use and future of public space and the link between the location of public engagement and the level of inclusiveness. This illustrates the magnitude and consciousness of the effort required\n to be truly inclusive. Above all, our own understanding of inclusivity broadened significantly over the duration of the project, illustrating the clear advantage of using a transdisciplinary approach in research. Our findings have been summarised in a small video.","PeriodicalId":316049,"journal":{"name":"Transdisciplinary Insights","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"InclusiVaart: (Re)defining shared neighbourhood spaces\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Maria Bianchi, Ziloy Croughs, Elise Descheemaeker, A. Mier, A. A. Pacific, A. Van Der Stighelen, M. Van Espen, L. Wirla, H. Vrebos, K. Hannes\",\"doi\":\"10.11116/tdi2021.5.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cities and dense urban areas are dynamic environments, always adapting to changing circumstances and shocks, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Vaartkom, a neighbourhood in Leuven, provides an interesting case-study, having undergone a drastic transformation in the past two decades,\\n from dilapidated industrial zone to residential quarter and cultural hot-spot. This has introduced a demographic shift, which inevitably influences the use of public and private space in the neighbourhood, creating new areas for inclusion and exclusion. Our research focuses on how the use\\n of public space has changed under COVID-19, and how community members envision their neighbourhood in a post-COVID context. We employed various methods – such as interviews, site visits, stakeholder and physical mapping exercises – and worked with the community to identify the\\n different areas of in-and exclusivity. Some findings relate to the conflicting expectations about the use and future of public space and the link between the location of public engagement and the level of inclusiveness. This illustrates the magnitude and consciousness of the effort required\\n to be truly inclusive. Above all, our own understanding of inclusivity broadened significantly over the duration of the project, illustrating the clear advantage of using a transdisciplinary approach in research. Our findings have been summarised in a small video.\",\"PeriodicalId\":316049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transdisciplinary Insights\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transdisciplinary Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11116/tdi2021.5.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transdisciplinary Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11116/tdi2021.5.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市和人口密集的城市地区是动态的环境,始终适应不断变化的环境和冲击,例如最近的COVID-19大流行。鲁汶的Vaartkom社区提供了一个有趣的案例研究,在过去的二十年里,它经历了巨大的转变,从破败的工业区到住宅区和文化热点。这导致了人口结构的转变,不可避免地影响了社区公共和私人空间的使用,创造了新的包容和排斥领域。我们的研究重点是COVID-19下公共空间的使用如何变化,以及社区成员如何在后covid背景下设想他们的社区。我们采用了各种方法,如访谈、实地考察、利益相关者和物理测绘练习,并与社区合作,确定不同的内部和排他性领域。一些调查结果涉及对公共空间的使用和未来的相互矛盾的期望,以及公众参与的地点与包容性水平之间的联系。这说明了实现真正包容性所需要的努力的规模和意识。最重要的是,我们自己对包容性的理解在项目期间显著扩大,说明了在研究中使用跨学科方法的明显优势。我们的发现已在一个小视频中进行了总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
InclusiVaart: (Re)defining shared neighbourhood spaces
Cities and dense urban areas are dynamic environments, always adapting to changing circumstances and shocks, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Vaartkom, a neighbourhood in Leuven, provides an interesting case-study, having undergone a drastic transformation in the past two decades, from dilapidated industrial zone to residential quarter and cultural hot-spot. This has introduced a demographic shift, which inevitably influences the use of public and private space in the neighbourhood, creating new areas for inclusion and exclusion. Our research focuses on how the use of public space has changed under COVID-19, and how community members envision their neighbourhood in a post-COVID context. We employed various methods – such as interviews, site visits, stakeholder and physical mapping exercises – and worked with the community to identify the different areas of in-and exclusivity. Some findings relate to the conflicting expectations about the use and future of public space and the link between the location of public engagement and the level of inclusiveness. This illustrates the magnitude and consciousness of the effort required to be truly inclusive. Above all, our own understanding of inclusivity broadened significantly over the duration of the project, illustrating the clear advantage of using a transdisciplinary approach in research. Our findings have been summarised in a small video.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信