S. Walsh, B. Kirchhoff
{"title":"Disruptive technologies: innovators' problem and entrepreneurs' opportunity","authors":"S. Walsh, B. Kirchhoff","doi":"10.1109/EMS.2000.872523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the statement made by Christensen (1997) that disruptive technologies are introduced into markets with innovations that cost more and perform more poorly than existing products. This is likely to be an industry specific observation, observed in part because of an imprecise definition of disruptive innovation. Empirical evidence suggests that small independent firms are more successful at the innovation process because they are unaffiliated with an existing product line, do not have an existing customer base, and so search for applications where their technology can provide immediate profitability. This \"fresh start\" advantage means that the innovator's dilemma provides major opportunities for small entrepreneurial firms.","PeriodicalId":440516,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society. EMS - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37139)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society. EMS - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37139)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMS.2000.872523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文检验了Christensen(1997)所做的陈述,即颠覆性技术是通过比现有产品成本更高、性能更差的创新引入市场的。这可能是一个特定行业的观察结果,部分原因是对破坏性创新的定义不精确。经验证据表明,小型独立公司在创新过程中更为成功,因为它们与现有的产品线无关,没有现有的客户群,因此会寻找其技术可以立即带来盈利的应用。这种“重新开始”的优势意味着创新者的困境为小型创业公司提供了重要的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disruptive technologies: innovators' problem and entrepreneurs' opportunity
This paper examines the statement made by Christensen (1997) that disruptive technologies are introduced into markets with innovations that cost more and perform more poorly than existing products. This is likely to be an industry specific observation, observed in part because of an imprecise definition of disruptive innovation. Empirical evidence suggests that small independent firms are more successful at the innovation process because they are unaffiliated with an existing product line, do not have an existing customer base, and so search for applications where their technology can provide immediate profitability. This "fresh start" advantage means that the innovator's dilemma provides major opportunities for small entrepreneurial firms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信