世界文学的世俗性:歌德在中国与魏玛之间的“Handelsverkehr”

B. Murnane
{"title":"世界文学的世俗性:歌德在中国与魏玛之间的“Handelsverkehr”","authors":"B. Murnane","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2022.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay investigates the social and economic conditions that enabled Goethe's reception of Chinese literature in the 1820s, a productive engagement that led to the genesis of Weltliteratur as a critical practice. This entails a commitment to a \"worlding\" of world literature, that is to say, a form of analysis that pays heed to the actual conditions of translation, production, transport, and communication between China and Weimar in the period. Taking Peter Perring Thoms's translation Chinese Courtship as a case study, it is possible to show how Goethe's seemingly abstract and intellectual idea of Weltliteratur is anchored within networks of commercial and imperial mediation of literatures from around the globe. This then allows us to trace the tensions between two competing moments at the heart of Goethe's formulation of world literature, cosmopolitan Theilnahme and Eurocentric universalism, more fully. Finally, this historical account may be considered to be an intervention in contemporary debates on world literature, suggesting some of the ways in which we may critique the continuing structures and practices of inequality in world literary criticism's current modes of worldmaking.","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Worldliness of Weltliteratur: Goethe's \\\"Handelsverkehr\\\" between China and Weimar\",\"authors\":\"B. Murnane\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/gyr.2022.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay investigates the social and economic conditions that enabled Goethe's reception of Chinese literature in the 1820s, a productive engagement that led to the genesis of Weltliteratur as a critical practice. This entails a commitment to a \\\"worlding\\\" of world literature, that is to say, a form of analysis that pays heed to the actual conditions of translation, production, transport, and communication between China and Weimar in the period. Taking Peter Perring Thoms's translation Chinese Courtship as a case study, it is possible to show how Goethe's seemingly abstract and intellectual idea of Weltliteratur is anchored within networks of commercial and imperial mediation of literatures from around the globe. This then allows us to trace the tensions between two competing moments at the heart of Goethe's formulation of world literature, cosmopolitan Theilnahme and Eurocentric universalism, more fully. Finally, this historical account may be considered to be an intervention in contemporary debates on world literature, suggesting some of the ways in which we may critique the continuing structures and practices of inequality in world literary criticism's current modes of worldmaking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Goethe Yearbook\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Goethe Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2022.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Goethe Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2022.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文考察了歌德在19世纪20年代接受中国文学的社会和经济条件,这种富有成效的参与导致了世界文学作为一种批评实践的起源。这需要致力于世界文学的“世界化”,也就是说,一种关注当时中国与魏玛之间翻译、生产、运输和交流的实际情况的分析形式。以彼得·潘林·汤姆斯的翻译《中国的求爱》为例,我们可以看到歌德看似抽象和智慧的世界文学理念是如何在全球范围内的商业和帝国主义文学中介网络中扎根的。这样,我们就可以更全面地追溯歌德世界文学构想中两个相互竞争的时刻之间的紧张关系,即世界主义的泰尔纳姆和以欧洲为中心的普遍主义。最后,这一历史记录可能被认为是对当代世界文学辩论的一种干预,它提出了一些我们可以批评世界文学批评当前世界建构模式中持续存在的不平等结构和实践的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Worldliness of Weltliteratur: Goethe's "Handelsverkehr" between China and Weimar
Abstract:This essay investigates the social and economic conditions that enabled Goethe's reception of Chinese literature in the 1820s, a productive engagement that led to the genesis of Weltliteratur as a critical practice. This entails a commitment to a "worlding" of world literature, that is to say, a form of analysis that pays heed to the actual conditions of translation, production, transport, and communication between China and Weimar in the period. Taking Peter Perring Thoms's translation Chinese Courtship as a case study, it is possible to show how Goethe's seemingly abstract and intellectual idea of Weltliteratur is anchored within networks of commercial and imperial mediation of literatures from around the globe. This then allows us to trace the tensions between two competing moments at the heart of Goethe's formulation of world literature, cosmopolitan Theilnahme and Eurocentric universalism, more fully. Finally, this historical account may be considered to be an intervention in contemporary debates on world literature, suggesting some of the ways in which we may critique the continuing structures and practices of inequality in world literary criticism's current modes of worldmaking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信