通用约束逻辑编程与软件分析中的不完备性

C. Wild
{"title":"通用约束逻辑编程与软件分析中的不完备性","authors":"C. Wild","doi":"10.1109/WST.1988.5368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current logic programming systems, as typified by Prolog, contain limitations which restrict their usefulness during the specification, design, and testing of software. A major limitation is the inability to perform analysis in the presence of incomplete information. Three sources of incompleteness are discussed. The result of this analysis suggests an efficient algorithm for a special case. Furthermore, it partitions the problem for testing purposes into three classes: (1) those points which satisfy the special case; (2) those which satisfy the general case but not the special case; and (3) those points which do not satisfy either. Thus, the analysis has uncovered possible structure within the implementation including the case in which the implementation has failed to address class 2 correctly (error of omission) but handle classes 1 and 3 correctly.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":269073,"journal":{"name":"[1988] Proceedings. Second Workshop on Software Testing, Verification, and Analysis","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generic constraint logic programming and incompleteness in the analysis of software\",\"authors\":\"C. Wild\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WST.1988.5368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current logic programming systems, as typified by Prolog, contain limitations which restrict their usefulness during the specification, design, and testing of software. A major limitation is the inability to perform analysis in the presence of incomplete information. Three sources of incompleteness are discussed. The result of this analysis suggests an efficient algorithm for a special case. Furthermore, it partitions the problem for testing purposes into three classes: (1) those points which satisfy the special case; (2) those which satisfy the general case but not the special case; and (3) those points which do not satisfy either. Thus, the analysis has uncovered possible structure within the implementation including the case in which the implementation has failed to address class 2 correctly (error of omission) but handle classes 1 and 3 correctly.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":269073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1988] Proceedings. Second Workshop on Software Testing, Verification, and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1988] Proceedings. Second Workshop on Software Testing, Verification, and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WST.1988.5368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1988] Proceedings. Second Workshop on Software Testing, Verification, and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WST.1988.5368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

以Prolog为代表的当前逻辑编程系统包含一些限制,这些限制限制了它们在软件规范、设计和测试期间的有用性。一个主要的限制是无法在不完整信息的情况下进行分析。讨论了不完备性的三个来源。分析结果提出了一种适用于特殊情况的有效算法。进一步地,它将问题划分为三类:(1)满足特殊情况的点;(二)符合一般情况而不符合特殊情况的;(3)两者都不满足的点。因此,分析揭示了实现中可能的结构,包括实现未能正确处理类2(遗漏错误)但正确处理类1和3的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generic constraint logic programming and incompleteness in the analysis of software
Current logic programming systems, as typified by Prolog, contain limitations which restrict their usefulness during the specification, design, and testing of software. A major limitation is the inability to perform analysis in the presence of incomplete information. Three sources of incompleteness are discussed. The result of this analysis suggests an efficient algorithm for a special case. Furthermore, it partitions the problem for testing purposes into three classes: (1) those points which satisfy the special case; (2) those which satisfy the general case but not the special case; and (3) those points which do not satisfy either. Thus, the analysis has uncovered possible structure within the implementation including the case in which the implementation has failed to address class 2 correctly (error of omission) but handle classes 1 and 3 correctly.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信