作为外部约束的合并问题

Joseph C. Gratz
{"title":"作为外部约束的合并问题","authors":"Joseph C. Gratz","doi":"10.7916/JLA.V43I3.5883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What is merger? Let’s first take a look at what the Second Circuit says merger is. The Second Circuit says merger happens “in those instances where there is only one or so few ways of expressing an idea that protection of the expression would effectively accord protection to the idea itself.”1 A situation where, if you’ve got a monopoly on a particular way of expressing something, you’ve effectively got a monopoly on that thing—and we don’t want you to have a monopoly on that thing. I’ll talk in a little bit about what the kinds of things are. Why only one “or so few” ways? To avoid a situation where there are three ways of expressing it, and three people express it in all of those three ways, and all get exclusive rights in their particular way. Now there is still no available way for the public to express that thing that we want the public to be able to express without the interference of copyright.","PeriodicalId":222420,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Merger as a Matter of Extrinsic Constraints\",\"authors\":\"Joseph C. Gratz\",\"doi\":\"10.7916/JLA.V43I3.5883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What is merger? Let’s first take a look at what the Second Circuit says merger is. The Second Circuit says merger happens “in those instances where there is only one or so few ways of expressing an idea that protection of the expression would effectively accord protection to the idea itself.”1 A situation where, if you’ve got a monopoly on a particular way of expressing something, you’ve effectively got a monopoly on that thing—and we don’t want you to have a monopoly on that thing. I’ll talk in a little bit about what the kinds of things are. Why only one “or so few” ways? To avoid a situation where there are three ways of expressing it, and three people express it in all of those three ways, and all get exclusive rights in their particular way. Now there is still no available way for the public to express that thing that we want the public to be able to express without the interference of copyright.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7916/JLA.V43I3.5883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/JLA.V43I3.5883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

什么是合并?让我们先来看看第二巡回法院对合并的定义。第二巡回法院表示,合并发生在“只有一种或几种表达思想的方式的情况下,保护这种表达将有效地保护思想本身。”在这种情况下,如果你垄断了某种特定的表达方式,你实际上就垄断了那件事,而我们不希望你垄断那件事。我会稍微讲一下这些东西是什么。为什么只有一种或几种方式?为了避免有三种表达方式的情况,三个人用这三种方式表达它,并且都以他们特定的方式获得专有权。现在公众仍然没有办法表达我们希望公众能够在不受版权干扰的情况下表达的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Merger as a Matter of Extrinsic Constraints
What is merger? Let’s first take a look at what the Second Circuit says merger is. The Second Circuit says merger happens “in those instances where there is only one or so few ways of expressing an idea that protection of the expression would effectively accord protection to the idea itself.”1 A situation where, if you’ve got a monopoly on a particular way of expressing something, you’ve effectively got a monopoly on that thing—and we don’t want you to have a monopoly on that thing. I’ll talk in a little bit about what the kinds of things are. Why only one “or so few” ways? To avoid a situation where there are three ways of expressing it, and three people express it in all of those three ways, and all get exclusive rights in their particular way. Now there is still no available way for the public to express that thing that we want the public to be able to express without the interference of copyright.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信