一切如常?

Jonas Thorborg Stage
{"title":"一切如常?","authors":"Jonas Thorborg Stage","doi":"10.54337/academicquarter.vi24.7252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Co-creation in health research is a rising trend, as funding bodies increasingly favor research that involves citizens in the research process. Furthermore, research strategies, policy documents, and statements from Danish health institutions have begun to highlight the benefits of co-creation in health research. There is an increasing expectation and claim that citizens and users of health research should influence and take part in such research processes. Yet inter- national studies have shown that social position matters for the in- clusion and exclusion of citizens in health research. The article dis- cusses how citizens’ social position may matter for co-creation in health research by drawing on relevant research literature. Further- more, I apply central notions of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu (e.g., field, capital and habitus) to discuss diverse prerequisites for citi- zens to co-create in health research. This article focuses on the risk in patient and public involvement of reproducing health disparities through co-creation of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":285489,"journal":{"name":"Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Business as usual?\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Thorborg Stage\",\"doi\":\"10.54337/academicquarter.vi24.7252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Co-creation in health research is a rising trend, as funding bodies increasingly favor research that involves citizens in the research process. Furthermore, research strategies, policy documents, and statements from Danish health institutions have begun to highlight the benefits of co-creation in health research. There is an increasing expectation and claim that citizens and users of health research should influence and take part in such research processes. Yet inter- national studies have shown that social position matters for the in- clusion and exclusion of citizens in health research. The article dis- cusses how citizens’ social position may matter for co-creation in health research by drawing on relevant research literature. Further- more, I apply central notions of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu (e.g., field, capital and habitus) to discuss diverse prerequisites for citi- zens to co-create in health research. This article focuses on the risk in patient and public involvement of reproducing health disparities through co-creation of knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54337/academicquarter.vi24.7252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Quarter | Akademisk kvarter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54337/academicquarter.vi24.7252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着资助机构越来越倾向于让公民参与研究过程的研究,卫生研究中的共同创造是一个日益上升的趋势。此外,丹麦卫生机构的研究战略、政策文件和声明已经开始强调共同创造在卫生研究中的好处。越来越多的人期望和要求公民和卫生研究的使用者应该影响和参与这种研究过程。然而,国际研究表明,社会地位对健康研究中公民的加入和排除有影响。本文通过借鉴相关研究文献,讨论了公民的社会地位如何影响健康研究中的共同创造。此外,我还运用社会学家皮埃尔·布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)的核心概念(例如,领域、资本和习惯),讨论了市民在健康研究中共同创造的各种先决条件。本文重点关注通过共同创造知识再现健康差异对患者和公众参与的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Business as usual?
Co-creation in health research is a rising trend, as funding bodies increasingly favor research that involves citizens in the research process. Furthermore, research strategies, policy documents, and statements from Danish health institutions have begun to highlight the benefits of co-creation in health research. There is an increasing expectation and claim that citizens and users of health research should influence and take part in such research processes. Yet inter- national studies have shown that social position matters for the in- clusion and exclusion of citizens in health research. The article dis- cusses how citizens’ social position may matter for co-creation in health research by drawing on relevant research literature. Further- more, I apply central notions of the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu (e.g., field, capital and habitus) to discuss diverse prerequisites for citi- zens to co-create in health research. This article focuses on the risk in patient and public involvement of reproducing health disparities through co-creation of knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信