大型显示器人机交互机制的比较研究

Naveed Ahmed, H. Kharoub, S. Medjden, Areej Alsaafin, M. Lataifeh
{"title":"大型显示器人机交互机制的比较研究","authors":"Naveed Ahmed, H. Kharoub, S. Medjden, Areej Alsaafin, M. Lataifeh","doi":"10.1109/ICHMS49158.2020.9209353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work presents a new comparative study for manipulating animated 3D content on a large scale display using two user interaction mechanisms. The first interaction mechanism relies on a traditional cursor-based user interface (UI) with onscreen interaction elements. The second interaction mechanism adopts a gesture-based UI without any visible interaction elements. The user’s distance from the display is significantly farther compared to a traditional desktop to correctly gauge the impact of a cursor-based UI compared to a gesture-based UI on a large scale display. Both interaction mechanisms are extensively evaluated via a user study in terms of usability, user experience (UX), and ergonomics. Through both quantitative and the qualitative evaluation, the results show that a gesture-based interface is a preferred method to manipulate animated 3D content compared to a cursor-based UI on a large scale display in terms of usability and UX. The results also demonstrate that using a gesture-based UI does not rank higher in terms of physical and cognitive ergonomics compared to a cursor-based UI.","PeriodicalId":132917,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study to Assess Human Machine Interaction Mechanisms for Large Scale Displays\",\"authors\":\"Naveed Ahmed, H. Kharoub, S. Medjden, Areej Alsaafin, M. Lataifeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICHMS49158.2020.9209353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work presents a new comparative study for manipulating animated 3D content on a large scale display using two user interaction mechanisms. The first interaction mechanism relies on a traditional cursor-based user interface (UI) with onscreen interaction elements. The second interaction mechanism adopts a gesture-based UI without any visible interaction elements. The user’s distance from the display is significantly farther compared to a traditional desktop to correctly gauge the impact of a cursor-based UI compared to a gesture-based UI on a large scale display. Both interaction mechanisms are extensively evaluated via a user study in terms of usability, user experience (UX), and ergonomics. Through both quantitative and the qualitative evaluation, the results show that a gesture-based interface is a preferred method to manipulate animated 3D content compared to a cursor-based UI on a large scale display in terms of usability and UX. The results also demonstrate that using a gesture-based UI does not rank higher in terms of physical and cognitive ergonomics compared to a cursor-based UI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS49158.2020.9209353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHMS49158.2020.9209353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这项工作提出了一项新的比较研究,使用两种用户交互机制在大规模显示上操纵动画3D内容。第一种交互机制依赖于传统的基于光标的用户界面(UI)和屏幕上的交互元素。第二种交互机制采用基于手势的UI,没有任何可见的交互元素。与传统桌面相比,用户与显示器的距离要远得多,以便在大规模显示器上正确衡量基于光标的UI与基于手势的UI的影响。这两种交互机制都通过用户研究在可用性、用户体验(UX)和人体工程学方面进行了广泛的评估。通过定量和定性的评估,结果表明,在大规模显示器上,基于手势的界面在可用性和用户体验方面优于基于光标的界面。结果还表明,与基于光标的UI相比,使用基于手势的UI在物理和认知人体工程学方面并不排名更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study to Assess Human Machine Interaction Mechanisms for Large Scale Displays
This work presents a new comparative study for manipulating animated 3D content on a large scale display using two user interaction mechanisms. The first interaction mechanism relies on a traditional cursor-based user interface (UI) with onscreen interaction elements. The second interaction mechanism adopts a gesture-based UI without any visible interaction elements. The user’s distance from the display is significantly farther compared to a traditional desktop to correctly gauge the impact of a cursor-based UI compared to a gesture-based UI on a large scale display. Both interaction mechanisms are extensively evaluated via a user study in terms of usability, user experience (UX), and ergonomics. Through both quantitative and the qualitative evaluation, the results show that a gesture-based interface is a preferred method to manipulate animated 3D content compared to a cursor-based UI on a large scale display in terms of usability and UX. The results also demonstrate that using a gesture-based UI does not rank higher in terms of physical and cognitive ergonomics compared to a cursor-based UI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信