{"title":"达尔文最大的秘密被揭露:对格热戈兹·马雷克对我的书的否认事实评论的回应","authors":"M. Sutton","doi":"10.53763/fag.2016.13.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grzegorz Malec’s “There Is No Darwin’s Greatest Secret”, a review of my book Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s Greatest Secret, takes one extremely minor finding from my book and, despite his best efforts, manages to disconfirm just one of thirty examples of that minor finding. He then takes that one disconfirmed mere minor example and presents it as evidence that he has disconfirmed all the original major findings in my book. By so doing, his deceptive review goes far beyond the counter-academic deviance of mere cherry picking, it is more a case of gross misrepresentation to the point of de facto fact denial amounting to historic revisionist behaviour.","PeriodicalId":103828,"journal":{"name":"Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Darwin’s Greatest Secret Exposed: Response to Grzegorz Malec’s De Facto Fact Denying Review of My Book\",\"authors\":\"M. Sutton\",\"doi\":\"10.53763/fag.2016.13.135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Grzegorz Malec’s “There Is No Darwin’s Greatest Secret”, a review of my book Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s Greatest Secret, takes one extremely minor finding from my book and, despite his best efforts, manages to disconfirm just one of thirty examples of that minor finding. He then takes that one disconfirmed mere minor example and presents it as evidence that he has disconfirmed all the original major findings in my book. By so doing, his deceptive review goes far beyond the counter-academic deviance of mere cherry picking, it is more a case of gross misrepresentation to the point of de facto fact denial amounting to historic revisionist behaviour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy\",\"volume\":\"151 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2016.13.135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2016.13.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Grzegorz Malec的《没有达尔文最伟大的秘密》是对我的书《无主之言:达尔文最伟大的秘密》的评论,他从我的书中引用了一个极其微小的发现,尽管他尽了最大的努力,却只证实了那个微小发现的30个例子中的一个。然后,他拿那个被否定的小例子作为证据,证明他否定了我书中所有最初的主要发现。通过这样做,他的欺骗性评论远远超出了纯粹挑选樱桃的反学术越轨行为,它更像是一个严重歪曲事实的案例,达到了否认事实的程度,相当于历史修正主义行为。
Darwin’s Greatest Secret Exposed: Response to Grzegorz Malec’s De Facto Fact Denying Review of My Book
Grzegorz Malec’s “There Is No Darwin’s Greatest Secret”, a review of my book Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s Greatest Secret, takes one extremely minor finding from my book and, despite his best efforts, manages to disconfirm just one of thirty examples of that minor finding. He then takes that one disconfirmed mere minor example and presents it as evidence that he has disconfirmed all the original major findings in my book. By so doing, his deceptive review goes far beyond the counter-academic deviance of mere cherry picking, it is more a case of gross misrepresentation to the point of de facto fact denial amounting to historic revisionist behaviour.