利用扩散模型分析污水处理厂大气污染物排放

Lorenzo Fileni, G. Matteucci, G. Passerini, U. Rizza
{"title":"利用扩散模型分析污水处理厂大气污染物排放","authors":"Lorenzo Fileni, G. Matteucci, G. Passerini, U. Rizza","doi":"10.2495/AIR180211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dispersion of air pollutants such as Ammonia (NH3) and Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) emitted by a municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) was studied for a period of over one year. The main intent was to support the environmental impact assessment focusing on the diffusion of annoying odours over surrounding areas during the regular activity of the sewage treatment facility. The adopted methodology consists in comparing, in three test cases, the performance of the Gaussian plume model AERMOD, an American Meteorological Society and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model, against the performance of the 3-D Lagrangian model AUSTAL2000, a German Dispersion Model developed according to the Technical Instructions on Air Quality Control. Both models were run over a domain of about 30km2 made of hilly zones and located in the centre-eastern Italy. Ten sources of airborne pollutants, located along the sludge treatment line and considered as area sources, were taken into account. The diffuse emissions associated with odour production within WWTP were estimated considering the pollutant emission factors suggested by the American Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The test cases included different emission scenarios deriving from three different operative plant configurations set in order to investigate the most impacting one. The results show a good agreement between the two model outputs since the annual average for NH3 and H2S are almost equivalent. These concentrations are below the legal limits while the highest values, measured at closest receptors, are beneath the odour perceptibility thresholds. Some noteworthy differences concern the AERMOD distribution maps that show a sort of pollutant stagnation over complex topography areas, especially in valleys, and a farer allocation of the highest pollutants levels from the source, while the AUSTAL2000 model is more biased to distribute the highest values closer to the sources.","PeriodicalId":165416,"journal":{"name":"Air Pollution XXVI","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS IN A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT USING DISPERSION MODELS\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Fileni, G. Matteucci, G. Passerini, U. Rizza\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/AIR180211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dispersion of air pollutants such as Ammonia (NH3) and Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) emitted by a municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) was studied for a period of over one year. The main intent was to support the environmental impact assessment focusing on the diffusion of annoying odours over surrounding areas during the regular activity of the sewage treatment facility. The adopted methodology consists in comparing, in three test cases, the performance of the Gaussian plume model AERMOD, an American Meteorological Society and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model, against the performance of the 3-D Lagrangian model AUSTAL2000, a German Dispersion Model developed according to the Technical Instructions on Air Quality Control. Both models were run over a domain of about 30km2 made of hilly zones and located in the centre-eastern Italy. Ten sources of airborne pollutants, located along the sludge treatment line and considered as area sources, were taken into account. The diffuse emissions associated with odour production within WWTP were estimated considering the pollutant emission factors suggested by the American Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The test cases included different emission scenarios deriving from three different operative plant configurations set in order to investigate the most impacting one. The results show a good agreement between the two model outputs since the annual average for NH3 and H2S are almost equivalent. These concentrations are below the legal limits while the highest values, measured at closest receptors, are beneath the odour perceptibility thresholds. Some noteworthy differences concern the AERMOD distribution maps that show a sort of pollutant stagnation over complex topography areas, especially in valleys, and a farer allocation of the highest pollutants levels from the source, while the AUSTAL2000 model is more biased to distribute the highest values closer to the sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Pollution XXVI\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Pollution XXVI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/AIR180211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Pollution XXVI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/AIR180211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

对某城市污水处理厂排放的氨(NH3)和硫化氢(H2S)等大气污染物的扩散进行了为期一年多的研究。主要目的是支持环境影响评估,重点是在污水处理设施的正常活动期间向周围地区扩散令人讨厌的气味。采用的方法包括,在三个测试案例中,将高斯羽流模型AERMOD(美国气象学会和美国环境保护署监管模型)与三维拉格朗日模型AUSTAL2000(根据《空气质量控制技术说明》开发的德国色散模型)的性能进行比较。这两个模型都是在意大利中东部一个由丘陵地区组成的约30平方公里的区域运行的。考虑了沿污泥处理线作为区域污染源的10个空气污染物源。根据美国环境保护署(EPA)提出的污染物排放系数,估算了污水处理厂内与气味产生相关的漫射排放。测试用例包括从三种不同的运行工厂配置中产生的不同排放情景,以调查影响最大的一种。结果表明,两种模式的计算结果吻合较好,因为NH3和H2S的年平均值几乎相等。这些浓度低于法定限制,而在最近的受体处测量的最高值低于气味感知阈值。一些值得注意的差异涉及AERMOD分布图,该分布图显示了在复杂地形区域(特别是在山谷中)的一种污染物停滞,以及从源头分配最高污染物水平的较远,而AUSTAL2000模型更倾向于将最高值分布在更靠近源头的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALYSIS OF AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS IN A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT USING DISPERSION MODELS
The dispersion of air pollutants such as Ammonia (NH3) and Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) emitted by a municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) was studied for a period of over one year. The main intent was to support the environmental impact assessment focusing on the diffusion of annoying odours over surrounding areas during the regular activity of the sewage treatment facility. The adopted methodology consists in comparing, in three test cases, the performance of the Gaussian plume model AERMOD, an American Meteorological Society and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model, against the performance of the 3-D Lagrangian model AUSTAL2000, a German Dispersion Model developed according to the Technical Instructions on Air Quality Control. Both models were run over a domain of about 30km2 made of hilly zones and located in the centre-eastern Italy. Ten sources of airborne pollutants, located along the sludge treatment line and considered as area sources, were taken into account. The diffuse emissions associated with odour production within WWTP were estimated considering the pollutant emission factors suggested by the American Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The test cases included different emission scenarios deriving from three different operative plant configurations set in order to investigate the most impacting one. The results show a good agreement between the two model outputs since the annual average for NH3 and H2S are almost equivalent. These concentrations are below the legal limits while the highest values, measured at closest receptors, are beneath the odour perceptibility thresholds. Some noteworthy differences concern the AERMOD distribution maps that show a sort of pollutant stagnation over complex topography areas, especially in valleys, and a farer allocation of the highest pollutants levels from the source, while the AUSTAL2000 model is more biased to distribute the highest values closer to the sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信