{"title":"大型非稀疏数据集上线性支持向量机算法的比较","authors":"A. Lazar","doi":"10.1109/ICMLA.2010.137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper demonstrates the effectiveness of Linear Support Vector Machines (SVM) when applied to non-sparse datasets with a large number of instances. Two linear SVM algorithms are compared. The coordinate descent method (LibLinear) trains a linear SVM with the L2-loss function versus the cutting-plane algorithm (SVMperf), which uses a L1-loss function. Four Geographical Information System (GIS) datasets with over a million instances were used for this study. Each dataset consists of seven independent variables and a class label which denotes the urban areas versus the rural areas.","PeriodicalId":336514,"journal":{"name":"2010 Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Linear Support Vector Machine Algorithms on Large Non-Sparse Datasets\",\"authors\":\"A. Lazar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMLA.2010.137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper demonstrates the effectiveness of Linear Support Vector Machines (SVM) when applied to non-sparse datasets with a large number of instances. Two linear SVM algorithms are compared. The coordinate descent method (LibLinear) trains a linear SVM with the L2-loss function versus the cutting-plane algorithm (SVMperf), which uses a L1-loss function. Four Geographical Information System (GIS) datasets with over a million instances were used for this study. Each dataset consists of seven independent variables and a class label which denotes the urban areas versus the rural areas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2010.137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2010.137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparison of Linear Support Vector Machine Algorithms on Large Non-Sparse Datasets
This paper demonstrates the effectiveness of Linear Support Vector Machines (SVM) when applied to non-sparse datasets with a large number of instances. Two linear SVM algorithms are compared. The coordinate descent method (LibLinear) trains a linear SVM with the L2-loss function versus the cutting-plane algorithm (SVMperf), which uses a L1-loss function. Four Geographical Information System (GIS) datasets with over a million instances were used for this study. Each dataset consists of seven independent variables and a class label which denotes the urban areas versus the rural areas.