{"title":"软件系统中的网络外部性","authors":"G. Succi, P. Predonzani, A. Valerio, T. Vernazza","doi":"10.1145/338183.338194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"■ Network externalities are the effects on the value of a product that can be ascribed to the presence of a network of users of such a product. They play an essential role in the business success of any product. The authors think that their role is even larger in the software industry, where (a) documentation and effective training are often lacking, and (b) consumers regard interoperability and compatibility as major benefits because of the ever-increasing need to share information and reprocess it over and over again with different tools. However, only few studies exist on this topic. Network externalities are caused by choices operating at different levels of product design data format, GUI metaphors, keyboard sequences, API, and so on. Understanding and planning their presence in a product is difficult. However, the ability to manipulate them properly provides a clear competitive advantage. This article briefly reviews the literature on network externalities, outlines a graphic notation to represent them, and applies such notation to describe an example, that of Microsoft Word 97. The study of the network externalities in Microsoft Word 97 shows several different kinds. The authors focus on the data format, the API, and the human-computer interaction paradigm. irms aim at maximizing the “value” of their products. However, the notion of value is hard to qualify and quantify. The hedonic model represents the value of a product as the sum of the values of the different components of the product [Berndt 1991]. The hedonic model has already been applied to software products in Gandal [1994]. In this paper we assume an hedonic model for the composition of the value of a product, and we cluster the components of the value into “internal” and “external.” Internal components depend on the product per se, that is, its functionality, its usability, its reliability, and so on. External components depend on the environment in which the product is located. The environment is formed by the users of the product and by other complementary or competing products. For instance, the value of e-mail service depends on the internal features of the service—availability, reliability, speed, and maximum size of the mailbox— and also on the environment, i.e., how many people we can reach using such a service. A service can supply the fastest connection or the largest mailbox, but if we cannot reach the people we want, the value we attach to the service is zero. Several researchers have investigated the value of internal components; see for example Boehm [1984] and Putnam and Myers [1992]. External components are usually called “network externalities,” since they are the result of a network of users of products and of complementary products [Farrell and Saloner 1985]. The authors think that network externalities play a strategic role in the software industry because:","PeriodicalId":270594,"journal":{"name":"ACM Stand.","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network externalities in software systems\",\"authors\":\"G. Succi, P. Predonzani, A. Valerio, T. Vernazza\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/338183.338194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"■ Network externalities are the effects on the value of a product that can be ascribed to the presence of a network of users of such a product. They play an essential role in the business success of any product. The authors think that their role is even larger in the software industry, where (a) documentation and effective training are often lacking, and (b) consumers regard interoperability and compatibility as major benefits because of the ever-increasing need to share information and reprocess it over and over again with different tools. However, only few studies exist on this topic. Network externalities are caused by choices operating at different levels of product design data format, GUI metaphors, keyboard sequences, API, and so on. Understanding and planning their presence in a product is difficult. However, the ability to manipulate them properly provides a clear competitive advantage. This article briefly reviews the literature on network externalities, outlines a graphic notation to represent them, and applies such notation to describe an example, that of Microsoft Word 97. The study of the network externalities in Microsoft Word 97 shows several different kinds. The authors focus on the data format, the API, and the human-computer interaction paradigm. irms aim at maximizing the “value” of their products. However, the notion of value is hard to qualify and quantify. The hedonic model represents the value of a product as the sum of the values of the different components of the product [Berndt 1991]. The hedonic model has already been applied to software products in Gandal [1994]. In this paper we assume an hedonic model for the composition of the value of a product, and we cluster the components of the value into “internal” and “external.” Internal components depend on the product per se, that is, its functionality, its usability, its reliability, and so on. External components depend on the environment in which the product is located. The environment is formed by the users of the product and by other complementary or competing products. For instance, the value of e-mail service depends on the internal features of the service—availability, reliability, speed, and maximum size of the mailbox— and also on the environment, i.e., how many people we can reach using such a service. A service can supply the fastest connection or the largest mailbox, but if we cannot reach the people we want, the value we attach to the service is zero. Several researchers have investigated the value of internal components; see for example Boehm [1984] and Putnam and Myers [1992]. External components are usually called “network externalities,” since they are the result of a network of users of products and of complementary products [Farrell and Saloner 1985]. The authors think that network externalities play a strategic role in the software industry because:\",\"PeriodicalId\":270594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Stand.\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Stand.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/338183.338194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Stand.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/338183.338194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
■网络外部性是对产品价值的影响,这种影响可以归因于该产品的用户网络的存在。它们在任何产品的商业成功中都起着至关重要的作用。作者认为他们在软件行业中的作用甚至更大,其中(a)文档和有效的培训经常缺乏,(b)消费者认为互操作性和兼容性是主要的好处,因为不断增加的需要共享信息,并使用不同的工具一次又一次地对其进行再处理。然而,关于这一主题的研究很少。网络外部性是由在产品设计数据格式、GUI隐喻、键盘序列、API等不同层次上操作的选择引起的。理解和规划它们在产品中的存在是很困难的。然而,正确操作它们的能力提供了一个明显的竞争优势。本文简要回顾了有关网络外部性的文献,概述了一种图形符号来表示它们,并应用这种符号来描述一个例子,即Microsoft Word 97。对microsoftword97中网络外部性的研究显示了几种不同的外部性。作者着重于数据格式、API和人机交互范例。公司的目标是使其产品的“价值”最大化。然而,价值的概念很难限定和量化。享乐模型将产品的价值表示为产品的不同组成部分的价值总和[Berndt 1991]。甘达尔[1994]已经将享乐模型应用于软件产品。在本文中,我们假设了一个产品价值构成的享乐模型,并将价值组成分为“内部”和“外部”。内部组件依赖于产品本身,即它的功能、可用性、可靠性等等。外部组件取决于产品所处的环境。环境是由产品的用户和其他互补或竞争的产品形成的。例如,电子邮件服务的价值取决于服务的内部特性——可用性、可靠性、速度和邮箱的最大大小——还取决于环境,即我们可以使用这种服务联系到多少人。一项服务可以提供最快的连接或最大的邮箱,但如果我们不能联系到我们想要的人,我们赋予这项服务的价值就是零。几位研究人员调查了内部成分的价值;参见Boehm[1984]和Putnam and Myers[1992]。外部组件通常被称为“网络外部性”,因为它们是产品和互补产品的用户网络的结果[Farrell和Saloner 1985]。作者认为,网络外部性在软件产业中扮演着战略性的角色,因为:
■ Network externalities are the effects on the value of a product that can be ascribed to the presence of a network of users of such a product. They play an essential role in the business success of any product. The authors think that their role is even larger in the software industry, where (a) documentation and effective training are often lacking, and (b) consumers regard interoperability and compatibility as major benefits because of the ever-increasing need to share information and reprocess it over and over again with different tools. However, only few studies exist on this topic. Network externalities are caused by choices operating at different levels of product design data format, GUI metaphors, keyboard sequences, API, and so on. Understanding and planning their presence in a product is difficult. However, the ability to manipulate them properly provides a clear competitive advantage. This article briefly reviews the literature on network externalities, outlines a graphic notation to represent them, and applies such notation to describe an example, that of Microsoft Word 97. The study of the network externalities in Microsoft Word 97 shows several different kinds. The authors focus on the data format, the API, and the human-computer interaction paradigm. irms aim at maximizing the “value” of their products. However, the notion of value is hard to qualify and quantify. The hedonic model represents the value of a product as the sum of the values of the different components of the product [Berndt 1991]. The hedonic model has already been applied to software products in Gandal [1994]. In this paper we assume an hedonic model for the composition of the value of a product, and we cluster the components of the value into “internal” and “external.” Internal components depend on the product per se, that is, its functionality, its usability, its reliability, and so on. External components depend on the environment in which the product is located. The environment is formed by the users of the product and by other complementary or competing products. For instance, the value of e-mail service depends on the internal features of the service—availability, reliability, speed, and maximum size of the mailbox— and also on the environment, i.e., how many people we can reach using such a service. A service can supply the fastest connection or the largest mailbox, but if we cannot reach the people we want, the value we attach to the service is zero. Several researchers have investigated the value of internal components; see for example Boehm [1984] and Putnam and Myers [1992]. External components are usually called “network externalities,” since they are the result of a network of users of products and of complementary products [Farrell and Saloner 1985]. The authors think that network externalities play a strategic role in the software industry because: