评估符号在设计安全方面的有效性

S. Muneer, Muhammad Nadeem, B. Kasi, Mir Hamayoun Yousaf
{"title":"评估符号在设计安全方面的有效性","authors":"S. Muneer, Muhammad Nadeem, B. Kasi, Mir Hamayoun Yousaf","doi":"10.23919/ICACT48636.2020.9061305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing software design approaches used to design security aspects lack notations that can be used to design the security requirements of a system which may result in more complex and dense designs. However, literature review has shown that there are some proposed notations to represent security aspects within a system. Other researchers have proposed evidence-based principles that provide basis for constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. The principles include: Graphic Economy, Perceptual Discriminability, Semiotic Clarity, Cognitive Integration, Visual Expressiveness etc. In this research, we have evaluated a set of proposed notations in accordance with principles for designing cognitively accepted graphics by conducting a human subject study. A questionnaire was distributed among a group of graduate and post-graduate students. The goal was to validate the notations based on theory of “How Visual Notations Communicate?”. This study will help researchers in developing cognitively accepted notations and set a course for designing new notations for UMLsec that are perceptually, semantically and visually expressive.","PeriodicalId":296763,"journal":{"name":"2020 22nd International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Notations for Designing Security Aspects\",\"authors\":\"S. Muneer, Muhammad Nadeem, B. Kasi, Mir Hamayoun Yousaf\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/ICACT48636.2020.9061305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Existing software design approaches used to design security aspects lack notations that can be used to design the security requirements of a system which may result in more complex and dense designs. However, literature review has shown that there are some proposed notations to represent security aspects within a system. Other researchers have proposed evidence-based principles that provide basis for constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. The principles include: Graphic Economy, Perceptual Discriminability, Semiotic Clarity, Cognitive Integration, Visual Expressiveness etc. In this research, we have evaluated a set of proposed notations in accordance with principles for designing cognitively accepted graphics by conducting a human subject study. A questionnaire was distributed among a group of graduate and post-graduate students. The goal was to validate the notations based on theory of “How Visual Notations Communicate?”. This study will help researchers in developing cognitively accepted notations and set a course for designing new notations for UMLsec that are perceptually, semantically and visually expressive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 22nd International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 22nd International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACT48636.2020.9061305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 22nd International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/ICACT48636.2020.9061305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

用于设计安全方面的现有软件设计方法缺乏可用于设计系统安全需求的符号,这可能导致更复杂和密集的设计。然而,文献综述表明,有一些建议的符号来表示系统中的安全方面。其他研究人员提出了基于证据的原则,为构建软件工程中的可视化符号提供了基础。这些原则包括:图形经济、感知可分辨性、符号清晰性、认知整合性、视觉表现力等。在这项研究中,我们根据设计认知上可接受的图形的原则,通过进行人类受试者研究,评估了一组拟议的符号。在一组研究生和研究生中分发了一份调查问卷。我们的目标是验证基于“视觉符号如何交流?”理论的符号。本研究将有助于研究人员开发认知上可接受的符号,并为设计具有感知、语义和视觉表现力的UMLsec新符号奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Notations for Designing Security Aspects
Existing software design approaches used to design security aspects lack notations that can be used to design the security requirements of a system which may result in more complex and dense designs. However, literature review has shown that there are some proposed notations to represent security aspects within a system. Other researchers have proposed evidence-based principles that provide basis for constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. The principles include: Graphic Economy, Perceptual Discriminability, Semiotic Clarity, Cognitive Integration, Visual Expressiveness etc. In this research, we have evaluated a set of proposed notations in accordance with principles for designing cognitively accepted graphics by conducting a human subject study. A questionnaire was distributed among a group of graduate and post-graduate students. The goal was to validate the notations based on theory of “How Visual Notations Communicate?”. This study will help researchers in developing cognitively accepted notations and set a course for designing new notations for UMLsec that are perceptually, semantically and visually expressive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信