Eva-Maria Cersovsky
{"title":"Ubi non est mulier, ingemiscit egens?","authors":"Eva-Maria Cersovsky","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvzgb78b.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay studies the feminization of different caring practices by examining\n the cultural meanings attached to the biblical proverb Sirach 36:27.\n Touching on diverse sources, it investigates three interrelated contexts of\n use. In particular, I explore discourses on wifely responsibilities towards\n the needy husband; on charitable care for the sick and poor; and on the\n nature and social status of women. I suggest that by using the proverb as\n an argument, learned men subsumed a wide variety of caring practices\n under received notions of essentially female duties and innate qualities,\n connected above all to gendered ideas of compassion. However, the essay\n also highlights ambivalent attitudes towards female caregivers, as well\n as their agency and power, that surface within these complex discourses.","PeriodicalId":237056,"journal":{"name":"Gender, Health, and Healing, 1250-1550","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender, Health, and Healing, 1250-1550","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvzgb78b.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文通过考察圣经谚语西拉书36:27的文化含义来研究不同护理实践的女性化。触及不同的来源,它调查了三个相互关联的语境使用。特别是,我探讨了关于妻子对贫困丈夫的责任的话语;关于对病人和穷人的慈善关怀;以及女性的性质和社会地位。我认为,通过使用这句谚语作为论据,有学问的男人将各种各样的关怀实践纳入了公认的基本女性责任和天生品质的观念之下,首先是与同情的性别观念联系在一起。然而,这篇文章也强调了对女性照顾者的矛盾态度,以及她们的代理和权力,在这些复杂的话语中浮出水面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ubi non est mulier, ingemiscit egens?
This essay studies the feminization of different caring practices by examining the cultural meanings attached to the biblical proverb Sirach 36:27. Touching on diverse sources, it investigates three interrelated contexts of use. In particular, I explore discourses on wifely responsibilities towards the needy husband; on charitable care for the sick and poor; and on the nature and social status of women. I suggest that by using the proverb as an argument, learned men subsumed a wide variety of caring practices under received notions of essentially female duties and innate qualities, connected above all to gendered ideas of compassion. However, the essay also highlights ambivalent attitudes towards female caregivers, as well as their agency and power, that surface within these complex discourses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信