{"title":"音频/语音隐写分析技术的比较研究","authors":"Catherine Paulin, S. Selouani, É. Hervet","doi":"10.1109/CCECE.2017.7946765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative study of four steganalysis techniques for speech/audio files. The Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) are used for the acoustical analysis of the audio files. The following steganalyzers are assessed: Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs), Deep Belief Networks (DBNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). These steganalysis methods are tested on three different steganographic approaches. Our experiments were carried out by using three steganographic techniques, namely, StegHide, Hide4PGP and FreqSteg that were applied to the Noizeus corpus. The results showed that the GMMs-based technique performed the best by reaching a perfect classification rate, without any error, followed by the SVMs, DBNs and RNNs.","PeriodicalId":238720,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 30th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of audio/speech steganalysis techniques\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Paulin, S. Selouani, É. Hervet\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCECE.2017.7946765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparative study of four steganalysis techniques for speech/audio files. The Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) are used for the acoustical analysis of the audio files. The following steganalyzers are assessed: Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs), Deep Belief Networks (DBNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). These steganalysis methods are tested on three different steganographic approaches. Our experiments were carried out by using three steganographic techniques, namely, StegHide, Hide4PGP and FreqSteg that were applied to the Noizeus corpus. The results showed that the GMMs-based technique performed the best by reaching a perfect classification rate, without any error, followed by the SVMs, DBNs and RNNs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":238720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE 30th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE 30th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2017.7946765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 30th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2017.7946765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative study of audio/speech steganalysis techniques
This paper presents a comparative study of four steganalysis techniques for speech/audio files. The Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) are used for the acoustical analysis of the audio files. The following steganalyzers are assessed: Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs), Deep Belief Networks (DBNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). These steganalysis methods are tested on three different steganographic approaches. Our experiments were carried out by using three steganographic techniques, namely, StegHide, Hide4PGP and FreqSteg that were applied to the Noizeus corpus. The results showed that the GMMs-based technique performed the best by reaching a perfect classification rate, without any error, followed by the SVMs, DBNs and RNNs.