批判理论的最新方向

D. Foster
{"title":"批判理论的最新方向","authors":"D. Foster","doi":"10.2307/1347458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If Critical Theory Since 1965 had been published by Norton, it would probably have been called The Norton Anthology of Contemporary Critical Theory, for there is no question that writing about the study of literature has become virtually a recognizable genre of text production. Having freed itself from the idea that criticism enjoys a parasitic relationship to primary literary texts, such writing enjoys the prerogatives vying for equal importance with conventionally identified literary genres, of viewing itself as making the recognition of literature possible by defining the parameters of the literary phenomenon, and of sustaining a tension between literary text production and other forms of cultural production that legitimates the ideological role of both literature and criticism in societies.","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent Directions in Critical Theory\",\"authors\":\"D. Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1347458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If Critical Theory Since 1965 had been published by Norton, it would probably have been called The Norton Anthology of Contemporary Critical Theory, for there is no question that writing about the study of literature has become virtually a recognizable genre of text production. Having freed itself from the idea that criticism enjoys a parasitic relationship to primary literary texts, such writing enjoys the prerogatives vying for equal importance with conventionally identified literary genres, of viewing itself as making the recognition of literature possible by defining the parameters of the literary phenomenon, and of sustaining a tension between literary text production and other forms of cultural production that legitimates the ideological role of both literature and criticism in societies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1347458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1347458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果《1965年以来的批判理论》由诺顿出版,它可能会被称为《诺顿当代批判理论选集》,因为毫无疑问,关于文学研究的写作实际上已经成为一种可识别的文本生产类型。把自己从批评与主要文学文本的寄生关系中解放出来,这样的写作享有与传统文学流派同等重要的特权,通过定义文学现象的参数,将自己视为对文学的认可成为可能,在文学文本生产和其他形式的文化生产之间保持一种紧张关系,这种紧张关系使文学和批评在社会中的意识形态角色合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recent Directions in Critical Theory
If Critical Theory Since 1965 had been published by Norton, it would probably have been called The Norton Anthology of Contemporary Critical Theory, for there is no question that writing about the study of literature has become virtually a recognizable genre of text production. Having freed itself from the idea that criticism enjoys a parasitic relationship to primary literary texts, such writing enjoys the prerogatives vying for equal importance with conventionally identified literary genres, of viewing itself as making the recognition of literature possible by defining the parameters of the literary phenomenon, and of sustaining a tension between literary text production and other forms of cultural production that legitimates the ideological role of both literature and criticism in societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信