A natureza do juízo道德em休谟

G. Lunardi
{"title":"A natureza do juízo道德em休谟","authors":"G. Lunardi","doi":"10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n1p89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The standard interpretation of the Humean motivation theory considers that it would subscribe to a conativist model based on desires (passions), while intrinsically motivating, that would commit us to a conception of motivational internalism and, therefore, with a non-cognitive position. Basically, this standard interpretation by Hume, maintains that moral judgments are of a purely conative nature, thus providing the agent with an intrinsic reason or motive to act (motivational internalism), while not expressing any rational cognitive content (non- cognitivism). Given the approximation between truth and knowledge, cognitivists also affirm the thesis that there is authentic moral knowledge. Moral judgments have cognitive content and not only, as non-cognitivists want, expressions of attitudes, preferences, desires or prescriptions. Thus, the contrast between cognitivism and non-cognitivism revolves primarily around the question of the nature of moral judgment. And, in Hume's classical interpretation, the nature of moral judgment would be non-cognitive. With this work I explore an alternative line of argument, in defense of a position that privileges the possibility of moral knowledge, according to Hume's moral philosophy. The foundations of morality in Hume examine the motivational requirement with the aim, to be criticized, not of moral knowledge (cognitivism) but of moral rationalism. However, this alternative line does not represent a pure adherence to cognitivism. The strategy followed by this argument, consists of pointing out the “practical” aspect of moral judgments, that is, their role in guiding and motivating moral actions, and then arguing that, given this primordial function of moral judgments, to repeat, its practical character, guiding actions, does not exclude, also, a moral knowledge. In a way, the argument is that, according to Hume's theory of motivation, the nature of moral judgment would have an objective and practical dimension (what really moves us to action).","PeriodicalId":143268,"journal":{"name":"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A natureza do juízo moral em Hume\",\"authors\":\"G. Lunardi\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n1p89\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The standard interpretation of the Humean motivation theory considers that it would subscribe to a conativist model based on desires (passions), while intrinsically motivating, that would commit us to a conception of motivational internalism and, therefore, with a non-cognitive position. Basically, this standard interpretation by Hume, maintains that moral judgments are of a purely conative nature, thus providing the agent with an intrinsic reason or motive to act (motivational internalism), while not expressing any rational cognitive content (non- cognitivism). Given the approximation between truth and knowledge, cognitivists also affirm the thesis that there is authentic moral knowledge. Moral judgments have cognitive content and not only, as non-cognitivists want, expressions of attitudes, preferences, desires or prescriptions. Thus, the contrast between cognitivism and non-cognitivism revolves primarily around the question of the nature of moral judgment. And, in Hume's classical interpretation, the nature of moral judgment would be non-cognitive. With this work I explore an alternative line of argument, in defense of a position that privileges the possibility of moral knowledge, according to Hume's moral philosophy. The foundations of morality in Hume examine the motivational requirement with the aim, to be criticized, not of moral knowledge (cognitivism) but of moral rationalism. However, this alternative line does not represent a pure adherence to cognitivism. The strategy followed by this argument, consists of pointing out the “practical” aspect of moral judgments, that is, their role in guiding and motivating moral actions, and then arguing that, given this primordial function of moral judgments, to repeat, its practical character, guiding actions, does not exclude, also, a moral knowledge. In a way, the argument is that, according to Hume's theory of motivation, the nature of moral judgment would have an objective and practical dimension (what really moves us to action).\",\"PeriodicalId\":143268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n1p89\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n1p89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对休谟动机理论的标准解释认为,它将认同一种基于欲望(激情)的自然主义模型,尽管它具有内在的激励作用,但这将使我们坚持动机内在主义的概念,因此,它具有非认知的地位。基本上,休谟的这一标准解释认为,道德判断具有纯粹的意向性,因此为行为人提供了内在的原因或行为动机(动机内在主义),而不表达任何理性的认知内容(非认知主义)。鉴于真理和知识之间的近似,认知主义者也肯定了存在真实道德知识的论点。道德判断具有认知内容,而不像非认知主义者所希望的那样,仅仅是态度、偏好、欲望或处方的表达。因此,认知主义与非认知主义的对比主要围绕道德判断的本质问题展开。在休谟的经典诠释中,道德判断的本质是非认知的。在这本书中,我探索了另一种论证路线,根据休谟的道德哲学,为一种赋予道德知识可能性特权的立场辩护。休谟的《道德基础》考察动机要求的目的不是批判道德知识主义(认知主义),而是批判道德理性主义。然而,这种替代路线并不代表对认知主义的纯粹坚持。这一论点所遵循的策略,包括指出道德判断的“实用”方面,即它们在指导和激励道德行为方面的作用,然后论证,鉴于道德判断的这种原始功能,重复一下,它的实用特征,指导行为,也不排除道德知识。在某种程度上,这个论点是,根据休谟的动机理论,道德判断的本质将具有客观和实践的维度(真正促使我们采取行动的东西)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A natureza do juízo moral em Hume
The standard interpretation of the Humean motivation theory considers that it would subscribe to a conativist model based on desires (passions), while intrinsically motivating, that would commit us to a conception of motivational internalism and, therefore, with a non-cognitive position. Basically, this standard interpretation by Hume, maintains that moral judgments are of a purely conative nature, thus providing the agent with an intrinsic reason or motive to act (motivational internalism), while not expressing any rational cognitive content (non- cognitivism). Given the approximation between truth and knowledge, cognitivists also affirm the thesis that there is authentic moral knowledge. Moral judgments have cognitive content and not only, as non-cognitivists want, expressions of attitudes, preferences, desires or prescriptions. Thus, the contrast between cognitivism and non-cognitivism revolves primarily around the question of the nature of moral judgment. And, in Hume's classical interpretation, the nature of moral judgment would be non-cognitive. With this work I explore an alternative line of argument, in defense of a position that privileges the possibility of moral knowledge, according to Hume's moral philosophy. The foundations of morality in Hume examine the motivational requirement with the aim, to be criticized, not of moral knowledge (cognitivism) but of moral rationalism. However, this alternative line does not represent a pure adherence to cognitivism. The strategy followed by this argument, consists of pointing out the “practical” aspect of moral judgments, that is, their role in guiding and motivating moral actions, and then arguing that, given this primordial function of moral judgments, to repeat, its practical character, guiding actions, does not exclude, also, a moral knowledge. In a way, the argument is that, according to Hume's theory of motivation, the nature of moral judgment would have an objective and practical dimension (what really moves us to action).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信