不确定性下的进展:AAA/KPMG关于在美国会计课程中实施国际财务报告准则的调查结果

ARN: Courses Pub Date : 2017-10-24 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.3058275
J. Beckman, M. Michel, P. Munter, Elizabeth Kaiser Venuti
{"title":"不确定性下的进展:AAA/KPMG关于在美国会计课程中实施国际财务报告准则的调查结果","authors":"J. Beckman, M. Michel, P. Munter, Elizabeth Kaiser Venuti","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3058275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports on the results of an AAA-wide survey on the state of faculty perceptions about, and actions toward, integrating IFRS into U.S. accounting curricula in a period of perceived reduction in regulatory momentum. In 2014, responses were received from 349 members representing all AAA sections. The entire dataset of surveys from 2008 to 2014 comprises 2,854 observations. Most faculty — from both accredited and non-accredited programs — now are not confident that the U.S will adopt IFRS at some point. That sentiment differs from 2011 when responses from accredited programs, either business-only or accounting, were neutral and from non-accredited programs were still confident of eventual adoption. Despite this belief, 83% of respondents continue to say it is important for faculty to teach IFRS in U.S. universities, similar to the 85% reporting this opinion in 2011. The strength of that viewpoint, however, has declined steadily since 2010 across respondents from all types of programs, accredited or not. Further, fully 21% of respondents do not believe IFRS should be integrated into the curriculum. The primary approach used is to integrate IFRS into existing courses, primarily the intermediate sequence, to the extent of one or two credit hours of coverage. Regardless of accreditation status, respondents report similar challenges to integrating IFRS as in earlier years.","PeriodicalId":276747,"journal":{"name":"ARN: Courses","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progress Despite Uncertainty: Results of the AAA/KPMG Survey on Implementation of IFRS into U.S. Accounting Curricula\",\"authors\":\"J. Beckman, M. Michel, P. Munter, Elizabeth Kaiser Venuti\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3058275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports on the results of an AAA-wide survey on the state of faculty perceptions about, and actions toward, integrating IFRS into U.S. accounting curricula in a period of perceived reduction in regulatory momentum. In 2014, responses were received from 349 members representing all AAA sections. The entire dataset of surveys from 2008 to 2014 comprises 2,854 observations. Most faculty — from both accredited and non-accredited programs — now are not confident that the U.S will adopt IFRS at some point. That sentiment differs from 2011 when responses from accredited programs, either business-only or accounting, were neutral and from non-accredited programs were still confident of eventual adoption. Despite this belief, 83% of respondents continue to say it is important for faculty to teach IFRS in U.S. universities, similar to the 85% reporting this opinion in 2011. The strength of that viewpoint, however, has declined steadily since 2010 across respondents from all types of programs, accredited or not. Further, fully 21% of respondents do not believe IFRS should be integrated into the curriculum. The primary approach used is to integrate IFRS into existing courses, primarily the intermediate sequence, to the extent of one or two credit hours of coverage. Regardless of accreditation status, respondents report similar challenges to integrating IFRS as in earlier years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":276747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARN: Courses\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARN: Courses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3058275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARN: Courses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3058275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文报告了一项aaa范围内的调查结果,调查内容是在监管势头明显减弱的时期,教师对将国际财务报告准则纳入美国会计课程的看法和行动。2014年,我们收到了来自349名代表AAA所有部门的会员的回复。2008年至2014年的整个调查数据集包括2854个观测值。大多数教师——无论是来自认证项目还是非认证项目——现在都不相信美国将在某个时候采用国际财务报告准则。这种看法与2011年有所不同,当时获得认证的项目(无论是商业项目还是会计项目)的反应都是中立的,而未获得认证的项目仍对最终采用该标准充满信心。尽管如此,83%的受访者仍然认为教师在美国大学教授国际财务报告准则很重要,这一比例与2011年的85%相似。然而,自2010年以来,这一观点的力量在所有类型的项目(无论是否获得认证)的受访者中稳步下降。此外,整整21%的受访者认为不应将国际财务报告准则纳入课程。采用的主要方法是将国际财务报告准则纳入现有课程,主要是中间课程,以覆盖一到两个学分的范围。无论认可状况如何,受访者都表示在整合国际财务报告准则方面面临与前几年类似的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Progress Despite Uncertainty: Results of the AAA/KPMG Survey on Implementation of IFRS into U.S. Accounting Curricula
This paper reports on the results of an AAA-wide survey on the state of faculty perceptions about, and actions toward, integrating IFRS into U.S. accounting curricula in a period of perceived reduction in regulatory momentum. In 2014, responses were received from 349 members representing all AAA sections. The entire dataset of surveys from 2008 to 2014 comprises 2,854 observations. Most faculty — from both accredited and non-accredited programs — now are not confident that the U.S will adopt IFRS at some point. That sentiment differs from 2011 when responses from accredited programs, either business-only or accounting, were neutral and from non-accredited programs were still confident of eventual adoption. Despite this belief, 83% of respondents continue to say it is important for faculty to teach IFRS in U.S. universities, similar to the 85% reporting this opinion in 2011. The strength of that viewpoint, however, has declined steadily since 2010 across respondents from all types of programs, accredited or not. Further, fully 21% of respondents do not believe IFRS should be integrated into the curriculum. The primary approach used is to integrate IFRS into existing courses, primarily the intermediate sequence, to the extent of one or two credit hours of coverage. Regardless of accreditation status, respondents report similar challenges to integrating IFRS as in earlier years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信