在三宝垄市放射科的辐射暴露概况,以支持医院/放射临床实验室的防护计划

D. Rochmayanti, S. Daryati, D. Darmini, Y. Kartikasari
{"title":"在三宝垄市放射科的辐射暴露概况,以支持医院/放射临床实验室的防护计划","authors":"D. Rochmayanti, S. Daryati, D. Darmini, Y. Kartikasari","doi":"10.31983/jimed.v5i1.3999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : All acts of radiation use, both for diagnostics, therapy and nuclear medicine, must go through a process of justification, limitation and optimization so that patients, officers and the surrounding environment get as much diagnostic benefit as possible with the smallest possible radiation risk. Some problems that arise in the Hospital / clinic, often ignore and do not pay attention to work exposure safety factors. The purpose of this study was to determine the profile of occupational radiation exposure and the effectiveness of radiation shielding in the radiology department of the Semarang city  then compared to the reference dose to determine the optimization of radiation protection. Methods: The type of research conducted is quantitative research with a survey and observational approach. Exposure measurements were carried out in 5 radiology department, which included 3 hospitals and 2 clinical laboratories. Documents and room observations are also carried out. For the effectiveness of the radiation barrier it is also measured before and after the radiation shielding by using a  surveymeter tool. The results data are then presented in descriptive analyses. Results: The results of the study of radiation exposure profiles in five radiology institutions, four institutions there was radiation exposure recorded on the  surveymeter tool, with the largest exposure value was 0.099 mSv / h (still below the safe limit of 1 mSv / year). Only one hospital is safe, and there are no leaks. Conclusions: The effectiveness of the radiation retaining wall, four hospitals have a barrier level equal to 1 mm Pb at 80 kVp irradiation, and 1 hospital (RSJ) has a radiation barrier equivalent to 0.5 mmPb.","PeriodicalId":205622,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Imejing Diagnostik (JImeD)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RADIATION EXPOSURE PROFILE IN RADIOLOGICAL DEPARTMENT TO SUPPORTING PROTECTION PROGRAMS IN HOSPITALS / RADIOLOGICAL CLINIC LABORATORY IN SEMARANG CITY\",\"authors\":\"D. Rochmayanti, S. Daryati, D. Darmini, Y. Kartikasari\",\"doi\":\"10.31983/jimed.v5i1.3999\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : All acts of radiation use, both for diagnostics, therapy and nuclear medicine, must go through a process of justification, limitation and optimization so that patients, officers and the surrounding environment get as much diagnostic benefit as possible with the smallest possible radiation risk. Some problems that arise in the Hospital / clinic, often ignore and do not pay attention to work exposure safety factors. The purpose of this study was to determine the profile of occupational radiation exposure and the effectiveness of radiation shielding in the radiology department of the Semarang city  then compared to the reference dose to determine the optimization of radiation protection. Methods: The type of research conducted is quantitative research with a survey and observational approach. Exposure measurements were carried out in 5 radiology department, which included 3 hospitals and 2 clinical laboratories. Documents and room observations are also carried out. For the effectiveness of the radiation barrier it is also measured before and after the radiation shielding by using a  surveymeter tool. The results data are then presented in descriptive analyses. Results: The results of the study of radiation exposure profiles in five radiology institutions, four institutions there was radiation exposure recorded on the  surveymeter tool, with the largest exposure value was 0.099 mSv / h (still below the safe limit of 1 mSv / year). Only one hospital is safe, and there are no leaks. Conclusions: The effectiveness of the radiation retaining wall, four hospitals have a barrier level equal to 1 mm Pb at 80 kVp irradiation, and 1 hospital (RSJ) has a radiation barrier equivalent to 0.5 mmPb.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Imejing Diagnostik (JImeD)\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Imejing Diagnostik (JImeD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31983/jimed.v5i1.3999\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Imejing Diagnostik (JImeD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31983/jimed.v5i1.3999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:所有的辐射使用行为,无论是诊断、治疗还是核医学,都必须经过一个合理、限制和优化的过程,以便患者、医务人员和周围环境在尽可能小的辐射风险下获得尽可能多的诊断效益。在医院/诊所出现的一些问题,往往忽视和不重视工作暴露的安全因素。本研究的目的是确定三宝垄市放射科的职业辐射暴露概况和辐射屏蔽的有效性,然后与参考剂量进行比较,以确定辐射防护的优化。方法:采用调查与观察相结合的定量研究方法。在5个放射科(包括3所医院和2个临床实验室)进行了暴露测量。还进行了文件和房间观察。在辐射屏蔽之前和之后,还使用测量工具测量了辐射屏障的有效性。结果数据随后以描述性分析的形式呈现。结果:对5个放射机构的辐射暴露剖面进行了研究,其中4个机构在测量仪工具上记录了辐射暴露,最大暴露值为0.099 mSv / h(仍低于1 mSv /年的安全限值)。只有一家医院是安全的,而且没有泄漏。结论:辐射挡墙的有效性,在80 kVp照射下,4家医院的防护水平相当于1 mmPb, 1家医院(RSJ)的防护水平相当于0.5 mmPb。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RADIATION EXPOSURE PROFILE IN RADIOLOGICAL DEPARTMENT TO SUPPORTING PROTECTION PROGRAMS IN HOSPITALS / RADIOLOGICAL CLINIC LABORATORY IN SEMARANG CITY
Background : All acts of radiation use, both for diagnostics, therapy and nuclear medicine, must go through a process of justification, limitation and optimization so that patients, officers and the surrounding environment get as much diagnostic benefit as possible with the smallest possible radiation risk. Some problems that arise in the Hospital / clinic, often ignore and do not pay attention to work exposure safety factors. The purpose of this study was to determine the profile of occupational radiation exposure and the effectiveness of radiation shielding in the radiology department of the Semarang city  then compared to the reference dose to determine the optimization of radiation protection. Methods: The type of research conducted is quantitative research with a survey and observational approach. Exposure measurements were carried out in 5 radiology department, which included 3 hospitals and 2 clinical laboratories. Documents and room observations are also carried out. For the effectiveness of the radiation barrier it is also measured before and after the radiation shielding by using a  surveymeter tool. The results data are then presented in descriptive analyses. Results: The results of the study of radiation exposure profiles in five radiology institutions, four institutions there was radiation exposure recorded on the  surveymeter tool, with the largest exposure value was 0.099 mSv / h (still below the safe limit of 1 mSv / year). Only one hospital is safe, and there are no leaks. Conclusions: The effectiveness of the radiation retaining wall, four hospitals have a barrier level equal to 1 mm Pb at 80 kVp irradiation, and 1 hospital (RSJ) has a radiation barrier equivalent to 0.5 mmPb.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信