改进组织管理流程方法的比较研究

Alexi Delgado, Patricia Condori
{"title":"改进组织管理流程方法的比较研究","authors":"Alexi Delgado, Patricia Condori","doi":"10.1109/CONIITI.2018.8587055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Administrative processes that are now shown in some companies indicate that they are not yet adapted to the change on agile methodologies, and they are in a dilemma between the loss of customers, which indicates low statistics of the product they offer. Today, software is supporting traditional life cycle changes. Over the course of these years, the promotion of good practices proposed by agile methodologies has changed the management and administration focus of development projects, which are an interesting challenge for standardization. The use of these methodologies is growing day by day, and soon no company will have an excuse to use them, if they wish to obtain improvements in their processes. For this reason, it is important to carry out studies about the agile methodologies that most resemble the organization according to their limits or forms of work, this fact could lead to a good result and avoid failure in the first attempt. For this reason, comparative studies are presented, ensuring the use of good practices proposed by agile methodologies to provide to client a quality product that satisfies the times and requirements. The methods that were analyzed and compared are: DSDM method, Scrum method, Lean method, and Kanban method.","PeriodicalId":292178,"journal":{"name":"2018 Congreso Internacional de Innovación y Tendencias en Ingeniería (CONIITI)","volume":"212 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Methods to Improve Administrative Processes in a Organization\",\"authors\":\"Alexi Delgado, Patricia Condori\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CONIITI.2018.8587055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Administrative processes that are now shown in some companies indicate that they are not yet adapted to the change on agile methodologies, and they are in a dilemma between the loss of customers, which indicates low statistics of the product they offer. Today, software is supporting traditional life cycle changes. Over the course of these years, the promotion of good practices proposed by agile methodologies has changed the management and administration focus of development projects, which are an interesting challenge for standardization. The use of these methodologies is growing day by day, and soon no company will have an excuse to use them, if they wish to obtain improvements in their processes. For this reason, it is important to carry out studies about the agile methodologies that most resemble the organization according to their limits or forms of work, this fact could lead to a good result and avoid failure in the first attempt. For this reason, comparative studies are presented, ensuring the use of good practices proposed by agile methodologies to provide to client a quality product that satisfies the times and requirements. The methods that were analyzed and compared are: DSDM method, Scrum method, Lean method, and Kanban method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Congreso Internacional de Innovación y Tendencias en Ingeniería (CONIITI)\",\"volume\":\"212 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Congreso Internacional de Innovación y Tendencias en Ingeniería (CONIITI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONIITI.2018.8587055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Congreso Internacional de Innovación y Tendencias en Ingeniería (CONIITI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONIITI.2018.8587055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

现在在一些公司中显示的管理流程表明他们还没有适应敏捷方法的变化,并且他们处于客户流失的两难境地,这表明他们提供的产品统计数据较低。今天,软件支持传统的生命周期变化。在这些年的过程中,敏捷方法所提出的良好实践的推广改变了开发项目的管理和管理重点,这对标准化来说是一个有趣的挑战。这些方法的使用日益增长,如果公司希望在其过程中获得改进,很快就没有借口使用它们了。因此,根据敏捷方法的限制或工作形式,对与组织最相似的敏捷方法进行研究是很重要的,这一事实可能会导致良好的结果,并避免第一次尝试失败。出于这个原因,本文提出了比较研究,以确保使用敏捷方法提出的良好实践,为客户提供满足时代和需求的高质量产品。分析比较的方法有:DSDM方法、Scrum方法、Lean方法、看板方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of Methods to Improve Administrative Processes in a Organization
Administrative processes that are now shown in some companies indicate that they are not yet adapted to the change on agile methodologies, and they are in a dilemma between the loss of customers, which indicates low statistics of the product they offer. Today, software is supporting traditional life cycle changes. Over the course of these years, the promotion of good practices proposed by agile methodologies has changed the management and administration focus of development projects, which are an interesting challenge for standardization. The use of these methodologies is growing day by day, and soon no company will have an excuse to use them, if they wish to obtain improvements in their processes. For this reason, it is important to carry out studies about the agile methodologies that most resemble the organization according to their limits or forms of work, this fact could lead to a good result and avoid failure in the first attempt. For this reason, comparative studies are presented, ensuring the use of good practices proposed by agile methodologies to provide to client a quality product that satisfies the times and requirements. The methods that were analyzed and compared are: DSDM method, Scrum method, Lean method, and Kanban method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信