社会-代理场景可视化的混合方法评价

T. Alspaugh, E. Baumer, Bill Tomlinson
{"title":"社会-代理场景可视化的混合方法评价","authors":"T. Alspaugh, E. Baumer, Bill Tomlinson","doi":"10.1109/CERE.2006.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scenarios are a well-explored technique for working with and understanding a system's requirements. However, comprehending a large group of scenarios for a system can be difficult, especially for non-experts. Our previous work proposed that visualizing scenarios using social animated characters could assist this process. However, assessing the efficacy of visualization techniques can be challenging. This paper proposes that a mixed-method study combining qualitative and quantitative analysis can be effective for evaluating a social visualization of a group of scenarios. Specifically, we found that the quantitative data addressed focused hypotheses, while the qualitative data gave us insight into the nature of scenarios in requirements, the goals of scenario visualization, and how the technology can support these goals more effectively. Both forms of analysis can be valuable and mutually reinforcing in developing and evaluating effective social visualizations of scenarios, and by extension for other work in RE as well.","PeriodicalId":148770,"journal":{"name":"Fourth International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (CERE'06 - RE'06 Workshop)","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Social-Agent Scenario Visualization\",\"authors\":\"T. Alspaugh, E. Baumer, Bill Tomlinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CERE.2006.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scenarios are a well-explored technique for working with and understanding a system's requirements. However, comprehending a large group of scenarios for a system can be difficult, especially for non-experts. Our previous work proposed that visualizing scenarios using social animated characters could assist this process. However, assessing the efficacy of visualization techniques can be challenging. This paper proposes that a mixed-method study combining qualitative and quantitative analysis can be effective for evaluating a social visualization of a group of scenarios. Specifically, we found that the quantitative data addressed focused hypotheses, while the qualitative data gave us insight into the nature of scenarios in requirements, the goals of scenario visualization, and how the technology can support these goals more effectively. Both forms of analysis can be valuable and mutually reinforcing in developing and evaluating effective social visualizations of scenarios, and by extension for other work in RE as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fourth International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (CERE'06 - RE'06 Workshop)\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fourth International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (CERE'06 - RE'06 Workshop)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CERE.2006.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering (CERE'06 - RE'06 Workshop)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CERE.2006.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

场景是处理和理解系统需求的一种经过充分探索的技术。然而,理解一个系统的大量场景可能是困难的,特别是对于非专家。我们之前的工作提出,使用社交动画角色来可视化场景可以帮助这一过程。然而,评估可视化技术的效果可能具有挑战性。本文提出了一种结合定性和定量分析的混合方法研究可以有效地评估一组场景的社会可视化。具体地说,我们发现定量数据处理了集中的假设,而定性数据使我们深入了解了需求中的场景的本质、场景可视化的目标,以及技术如何更有效地支持这些目标。这两种形式的分析在开发和评估场景的有效社会可视化方面都是有价值的,并且相互加强,并且可以扩展到可再生能源的其他工作中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Social-Agent Scenario Visualization
Scenarios are a well-explored technique for working with and understanding a system's requirements. However, comprehending a large group of scenarios for a system can be difficult, especially for non-experts. Our previous work proposed that visualizing scenarios using social animated characters could assist this process. However, assessing the efficacy of visualization techniques can be challenging. This paper proposes that a mixed-method study combining qualitative and quantitative analysis can be effective for evaluating a social visualization of a group of scenarios. Specifically, we found that the quantitative data addressed focused hypotheses, while the qualitative data gave us insight into the nature of scenarios in requirements, the goals of scenario visualization, and how the technology can support these goals more effectively. Both forms of analysis can be valuable and mutually reinforcing in developing and evaluating effective social visualizations of scenarios, and by extension for other work in RE as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信