pinacidil在原发性雷诺现象患者中的应用评估。

VASA. Supplementum Pub Date : 1992-01-01
E C Dompeling, A J Smit
{"title":"pinacidil在原发性雷诺现象患者中的应用评估。","authors":"E C Dompeling,&nbsp;A J Smit","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In fourteen patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon we performed a double-blind, controlled study, comparing single doses of 12.5 and 25 mg of the potassium channel opener pinacidil with placebo and the active control nifedipine in randomised order. The main response criterium was the area under the curve (AUC) of the photoelectric plethysmography (PEP) during cooling and rewarming, performed 2-3 hours after administration of the study medication. Single doses of 12.5 and 25 mg pinacidil were shown not to be superior to placebo in respect of the AUC of PEP. Nifedipine, on the contrary, was significantly better than placebo. We conclude that no efficacy can be expected from the potassium channel opener pinacidil in the treatment of primary Raynaud's phenomenon. The efficacy of nifedipine cannot be explained from central rheological effects, as total blood viscosity was the same after pinacidil, nifedipine and placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":76788,"journal":{"name":"VASA. Supplementum","volume":"34 ","pages":"34-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of pinacidil in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon.\",\"authors\":\"E C Dompeling,&nbsp;A J Smit\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In fourteen patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon we performed a double-blind, controlled study, comparing single doses of 12.5 and 25 mg of the potassium channel opener pinacidil with placebo and the active control nifedipine in randomised order. The main response criterium was the area under the curve (AUC) of the photoelectric plethysmography (PEP) during cooling and rewarming, performed 2-3 hours after administration of the study medication. Single doses of 12.5 and 25 mg pinacidil were shown not to be superior to placebo in respect of the AUC of PEP. Nifedipine, on the contrary, was significantly better than placebo. We conclude that no efficacy can be expected from the potassium channel opener pinacidil in the treatment of primary Raynaud's phenomenon. The efficacy of nifedipine cannot be explained from central rheological effects, as total blood viscosity was the same after pinacidil, nifedipine and placebo.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VASA. Supplementum\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"34-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VASA. Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VASA. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在14例原发性雷诺现象患者中,我们进行了一项双盲对照研究,将单剂量12.5和25mg钾通道打开剂pinacidil与安慰剂和主动对照硝苯地平按随机顺序进行比较。主要反应标准为给药后2 ~ 3小时冷却和复温时光电体积脉搏波曲线下面积(AUC)。单剂量12.5和25mg pinacidil在PEP的AUC方面并不优于安慰剂。相反,硝苯地平明显优于安慰剂。我们的结论是,钾通道打开剂pinacidil在原发性雷诺现象的治疗中没有疗效。硝苯地平的疗效不能从中枢流变学效应来解释,因为品酸、硝苯地平和安慰剂后的总血液粘度相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of pinacidil in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon.

In fourteen patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon we performed a double-blind, controlled study, comparing single doses of 12.5 and 25 mg of the potassium channel opener pinacidil with placebo and the active control nifedipine in randomised order. The main response criterium was the area under the curve (AUC) of the photoelectric plethysmography (PEP) during cooling and rewarming, performed 2-3 hours after administration of the study medication. Single doses of 12.5 and 25 mg pinacidil were shown not to be superior to placebo in respect of the AUC of PEP. Nifedipine, on the contrary, was significantly better than placebo. We conclude that no efficacy can be expected from the potassium channel opener pinacidil in the treatment of primary Raynaud's phenomenon. The efficacy of nifedipine cannot be explained from central rheological effects, as total blood viscosity was the same after pinacidil, nifedipine and placebo.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信