检察官在监督进行调查的机构及其在初步调查阶段的执行方面的权力

D. Emelyanova, K. Sinkin
{"title":"检察官在监督进行调查的机构及其在初步调查阶段的执行方面的权力","authors":"D. Emelyanova, K. Sinkin","doi":"10.14258/ralj(2022)2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the issues of the prosecutor’s implementation of supervisory functions for thebodies of inquiry at the stage of preliminary investigation. The authors conclude that at the stage of thepreliminary investigation the legislator gave the prosecutor a wide range of supervisory powers over theactivities of the bodies of inquiry. However, some of them require adjustments. For example the power of theprosecutor to give consent to the inquirer to initiate a petition before the court for the election cancellation ormodification of a preventive measure or for the production of another procedural action which is allowed onthe basis of a court decision it is advisable to implement not in relation to the inquirer but in relation to thebodies of inquiry. The availability of the prosecutor’s ability to resolve the recusals declared to the inquirerhis recusals as well as to remove the inquirer from further investigation if he violated the requirements ofthe law is superfluous and subject to transfer to the head of the inquiry unit and the head of the inquirybody. The article also concludes that it is necessary to fix a provision in the Criminal Procedure Code of theRussian Federation according to which written instructions of the prosecutor if they had taken place wouldhave been subject to mandatory inclusion in the materials of the criminal case.","PeriodicalId":236822,"journal":{"name":"Russian-Asian Legal Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE POWERS OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE SUPERVISION OF THE BODIES CONDUCTING THE INQUIRY AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION AT THE STAGE OF PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION\",\"authors\":\"D. Emelyanova, K. Sinkin\",\"doi\":\"10.14258/ralj(2022)2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the issues of the prosecutor’s implementation of supervisory functions for thebodies of inquiry at the stage of preliminary investigation. The authors conclude that at the stage of thepreliminary investigation the legislator gave the prosecutor a wide range of supervisory powers over theactivities of the bodies of inquiry. However, some of them require adjustments. For example the power of theprosecutor to give consent to the inquirer to initiate a petition before the court for the election cancellation ormodification of a preventive measure or for the production of another procedural action which is allowed onthe basis of a court decision it is advisable to implement not in relation to the inquirer but in relation to thebodies of inquiry. The availability of the prosecutor’s ability to resolve the recusals declared to the inquirerhis recusals as well as to remove the inquirer from further investigation if he violated the requirements ofthe law is superfluous and subject to transfer to the head of the inquiry unit and the head of the inquirybody. The article also concludes that it is necessary to fix a provision in the Criminal Procedure Code of theRussian Federation according to which written instructions of the prosecutor if they had taken place wouldhave been subject to mandatory inclusion in the materials of the criminal case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian-Asian Legal Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian-Asian Legal Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14258/ralj(2022)2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian-Asian Legal Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14258/ralj(2022)2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文就初步侦查阶段检察官对侦查机关行使监督职能的问题进行了探讨。作者的结论是,在初步调查阶段,立法者赋予检察官对调查机构活动的广泛监督权力。然而,其中一些需要调整。例如,检控官有权同意调查人向法院提出请愿,要求取消或修改一项预防措施,或提出另一项程序性诉讼,而根据法院的决定,最好不是针对调查人,而是针对调查机构。检察官是否有能力解决向询问者提出的回避,以及在询问者违反法律规定时免除对他的进一步调查,这些都是多余的,可以移交给询问者单位的负责人和调查机构的负责人。该条还得出结论说,有必要在《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》中确定一项规定,根据这项规定,检察官的书面指示如果发生,将必须列入刑事案件的材料中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE POWERS OF THE PROSECUTOR IN THE SUPERVISION OF THE BODIES CONDUCTING THE INQUIRY AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION AT THE STAGE OF PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
The article discusses the issues of the prosecutor’s implementation of supervisory functions for thebodies of inquiry at the stage of preliminary investigation. The authors conclude that at the stage of thepreliminary investigation the legislator gave the prosecutor a wide range of supervisory powers over theactivities of the bodies of inquiry. However, some of them require adjustments. For example the power of theprosecutor to give consent to the inquirer to initiate a petition before the court for the election cancellation ormodification of a preventive measure or for the production of another procedural action which is allowed onthe basis of a court decision it is advisable to implement not in relation to the inquirer but in relation to thebodies of inquiry. The availability of the prosecutor’s ability to resolve the recusals declared to the inquirerhis recusals as well as to remove the inquirer from further investigation if he violated the requirements ofthe law is superfluous and subject to transfer to the head of the inquiry unit and the head of the inquirybody. The article also concludes that it is necessary to fix a provision in the Criminal Procedure Code of theRussian Federation according to which written instructions of the prosecutor if they had taken place wouldhave been subject to mandatory inclusion in the materials of the criminal case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信