面向方面的编程是否提高了横切代码的开发速度?实证研究

2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement Pub Date : 2009-10-15 DOI:10.1109/ESEM.2009.5316028

Stefan Hanenberg, Sebastian Kleinschmager, Manuel Josupeit-Walter

{"title":"面向方面的编程是否提高了横切代码的开发速度?实证研究","authors":"Stefan Hanenberg, Sebastian Kleinschmager, Manuel Josupeit-Walter","doi":"10.1109/ESEM.2009.5316028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aspect-oriented software development is an approach which addresses the construction of software artifacts that traditional software engineering constructs fail to modularize: the so-called crosscutting concerns. However, although aspect-orientation claims to permit a better modularization of crosscutting concerns, it is still not clear whether the development time for such crosscutting concerns is increased or decreased by the application of aspect-oriented techniques. This paper addresses this issue by an experiment which compares the development times of crosscutting concerns using traditional composition techniques and aspect-oriented composition techniques using the object-oriented programming language Java and the aspect-oriented programming language AspectJ. In that way, the experiment reveals opportunities and risks caused by aspect-oriented programming techniques in comparison to object-oriented ones.","PeriodicalId":128479,"journal":{"name":"2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does aspect-oriented programming increase the development speed for crosscutting code? An empirical study\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Hanenberg, Sebastian Kleinschmager, Manuel Josupeit-Walter\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESEM.2009.5316028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aspect-oriented software development is an approach which addresses the construction of software artifacts that traditional software engineering constructs fail to modularize: the so-called crosscutting concerns. However, although aspect-orientation claims to permit a better modularization of crosscutting concerns, it is still not clear whether the development time for such crosscutting concerns is increased or decreased by the application of aspect-oriented techniques. This paper addresses this issue by an experiment which compares the development times of crosscutting concerns using traditional composition techniques and aspect-oriented composition techniques using the object-oriented programming language Java and the aspect-oriented programming language AspectJ. In that way, the experiment reveals opportunities and risks caused by aspect-oriented programming techniques in comparison to object-oriented ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2009.5316028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2009.5316028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 49

摘要

面向方面的软件开发是一种解决传统软件工程构造无法模块化的软件工件构造的方法:即所谓的横切关注点。然而，尽管面向方面声称允许对横切关注点进行更好的模块化，但是对于这种横切关注点的开发时间是通过面向方面技术的应用而增加还是减少，仍然不清楚。本文通过一个实验，比较了使用传统组合技术的横切关注点和使用面向对象编程语言Java和面向方面编程语言AspectJ的面向方面组合技术的横切关注点的开发时间。通过这种方式，实验揭示了与面向对象的编程技术相比，面向方面的编程技术带来的机会和风险。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Does aspect-oriented programming increase the development speed for crosscutting code? An empirical study

Aspect-oriented software development is an approach which addresses the construction of software artifacts that traditional software engineering constructs fail to modularize: the so-called crosscutting concerns. However, although aspect-orientation claims to permit a better modularization of crosscutting concerns, it is still not clear whether the development time for such crosscutting concerns is increased or decreased by the application of aspect-oriented techniques. This paper addresses this issue by an experiment which compares the development times of crosscutting concerns using traditional composition techniques and aspect-oriented composition techniques using the object-oriented programming language Java and the aspect-oriented programming language AspectJ. In that way, the experiment reveals opportunities and risks caused by aspect-oriented programming techniques in comparison to object-oriented ones.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement

自引率

0.00%

发文量