在尼日利亚消费者交易中适用《货物销售法》中的默示条款:在保护消费者和维护合同的神圣性之间寻求平衡

R. Mmadu
{"title":"在尼日利亚消费者交易中适用《货物销售法》中的默示条款:在保护消费者和维护合同的神圣性之间寻求平衡","authors":"R. Mmadu","doi":"10.15640/JBLE.V2N2A3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the meaning and application of Implied Terms in the Sale of Goods Act 1893 (SOGA) to consumer transaction. In doing this, the paper undertakes a comparative analysis of what is obtainable in other jurisdictions to discover where the Nigerian system lacks. The paper queries what it calls ‘continued imposition of responsibilities and liabilities’ on contracting parties under the guise of implied terms even where such terms were not contemplated by the contracting parties and as such, not expressly contained in the contract. The questions asked are: In examining the contractual principle of consensus ad idem, what rationale and legal justification could be placed on such term outside the express stipulations of the contracting parties? What is the justification for holding a party liable for breach of a term not expressly agreed upon but for customs of the trade or other extraneous considerations? The paper finds that the so-called implied terms in contract of sale are bubby traps which commercial men explore to deny liability arising from contracts freely entered by them or to hold innocent and uninformed party liable for breach of terms outside his contemplation. The paper advises that in developing economy like Nigeria where the level of literacy is low, it is undesirable to impute, inferred or implied duties and liabilities into contract outside those expressly agreed by contracting parties.","PeriodicalId":375048,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Business Law","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Implied Terms in the Sales of Goods act to Consumer Transactions in Nigeria: Between Consumers Protection and Safeguarding the Sanctity of Contracts\",\"authors\":\"R. Mmadu\",\"doi\":\"10.15640/JBLE.V2N2A3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the meaning and application of Implied Terms in the Sale of Goods Act 1893 (SOGA) to consumer transaction. In doing this, the paper undertakes a comparative analysis of what is obtainable in other jurisdictions to discover where the Nigerian system lacks. The paper queries what it calls ‘continued imposition of responsibilities and liabilities’ on contracting parties under the guise of implied terms even where such terms were not contemplated by the contracting parties and as such, not expressly contained in the contract. The questions asked are: In examining the contractual principle of consensus ad idem, what rationale and legal justification could be placed on such term outside the express stipulations of the contracting parties? What is the justification for holding a party liable for breach of a term not expressly agreed upon but for customs of the trade or other extraneous considerations? The paper finds that the so-called implied terms in contract of sale are bubby traps which commercial men explore to deny liability arising from contracts freely entered by them or to hold innocent and uninformed party liable for breach of terms outside his contemplation. The paper advises that in developing economy like Nigeria where the level of literacy is low, it is undesirable to impute, inferred or implied duties and liabilities into contract outside those expressly agreed by contracting parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Business Law\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Business Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15640/JBLE.V2N2A3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Business Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15640/JBLE.V2N2A3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了 1893 年《货物销售法》(SOGA)中隐含条款在消费者交易中的含义和应用。在此过程中,本文对其他司法管辖区的情况进行了比较分析,以发现尼日利亚制度的不足之处。本文对所谓的 "以默示条款为幌子继续将责任和义务强加给合同双方的做法 "提出质疑,即使这些条款并不是合同双方所考虑的,因此也没有明确包含在合同中。提出的问题是在审查一罪不二审的合同原则时,在合同双方的明文规定之外,对此类条款有什么理由和法律依据?出于交易习惯或其他外在因素的考虑,要求一方当事人对违反未明确约定的条款承担责任的理由是什么?本文认为,销售合同中的所谓默示条款是商业人士为否认他们自由签订的合同所产生的责任或要求无辜和不知情的一方为违反他所未考虑到的条款而承担责任而设下的陷阱。本文建议,在尼日利亚这样的发展中经济体中,由于识字率较低,在合同当事人明确同意的义务和责任之外,在合同中归咎、推断或暗示义务和责任是不可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Implied Terms in the Sales of Goods act to Consumer Transactions in Nigeria: Between Consumers Protection and Safeguarding the Sanctity of Contracts
This paper examines the meaning and application of Implied Terms in the Sale of Goods Act 1893 (SOGA) to consumer transaction. In doing this, the paper undertakes a comparative analysis of what is obtainable in other jurisdictions to discover where the Nigerian system lacks. The paper queries what it calls ‘continued imposition of responsibilities and liabilities’ on contracting parties under the guise of implied terms even where such terms were not contemplated by the contracting parties and as such, not expressly contained in the contract. The questions asked are: In examining the contractual principle of consensus ad idem, what rationale and legal justification could be placed on such term outside the express stipulations of the contracting parties? What is the justification for holding a party liable for breach of a term not expressly agreed upon but for customs of the trade or other extraneous considerations? The paper finds that the so-called implied terms in contract of sale are bubby traps which commercial men explore to deny liability arising from contracts freely entered by them or to hold innocent and uninformed party liable for breach of terms outside his contemplation. The paper advises that in developing economy like Nigeria where the level of literacy is low, it is undesirable to impute, inferred or implied duties and liabilities into contract outside those expressly agreed by contracting parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信