臂丛神经阻滞的腋窝入路与斜角肌间感觉阻滞的不同。

J T Shen, S T Ho, S J Hwang, H C Chung
{"title":"臂丛神经阻滞的腋窝入路与斜角肌间感觉阻滞的不同。","authors":"J T Shen,&nbsp;S T Ho,&nbsp;S J Hwang,&nbsp;H C Chung","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined results of brachial plexus block in 31 young male patients who underwent upper extremity surgical procedures. Interscalene block was performed using a paresthesia technique in 13 patients and axillary block, using the perivascular technique, in 18 patients. In both groups, 30 ml 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine was injected. Sensory blockade was evaluated at 5 min and 15 min after injection, determined by pinprick. Results showed that the interscalene technique preferentially blocked the cephalad nerves while the axillary technique produced similar block of both cephalad and caudal nerves of the brachial plexus. Difference between groups was statistically significant, suggesting that the extent of nerve block depends on the technique of approach per se. The difference in patterns of nerve blocked by either technique could be due to the access of local anesthetic to the different components of plexus in the sheath.</p>","PeriodicalId":77247,"journal":{"name":"Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different sensory blockade of interscalene versus axillary approach of brachial plexus block.\",\"authors\":\"J T Shen,&nbsp;S T Ho,&nbsp;S J Hwang,&nbsp;H C Chung\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We examined results of brachial plexus block in 31 young male patients who underwent upper extremity surgical procedures. Interscalene block was performed using a paresthesia technique in 13 patients and axillary block, using the perivascular technique, in 18 patients. In both groups, 30 ml 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine was injected. Sensory blockade was evaluated at 5 min and 15 min after injection, determined by pinprick. Results showed that the interscalene technique preferentially blocked the cephalad nerves while the axillary technique produced similar block of both cephalad and caudal nerves of the brachial plexus. Difference between groups was statistically significant, suggesting that the extent of nerve block depends on the technique of approach per se. The difference in patterns of nerve blocked by either technique could be due to the access of local anesthetic to the different components of plexus in the sheath.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了31例接受上肢外科手术的年轻男性患者臂丛神经阻滞的结果。13例患者采用感觉异常技术进行斜角肌间阻滞,18例患者采用血管周围技术进行腋窝阻滞。两组均注射1.5%利多卡因30 ml,加1:20万肾上腺素。分别于注射后5 min和15 min用针刺法测定感觉阻滞。结果表明,斜角肌间技术优先阻断头神经,而腋窝技术对臂丛头神经和尾神经均产生相似的阻断。组间差异有统计学意义,提示神经阻滞的程度取决于入路技术本身。两种技术阻断的神经模式的差异可能是由于局部麻醉对鞘丛不同成分的接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different sensory blockade of interscalene versus axillary approach of brachial plexus block.

We examined results of brachial plexus block in 31 young male patients who underwent upper extremity surgical procedures. Interscalene block was performed using a paresthesia technique in 13 patients and axillary block, using the perivascular technique, in 18 patients. In both groups, 30 ml 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine was injected. Sensory blockade was evaluated at 5 min and 15 min after injection, determined by pinprick. Results showed that the interscalene technique preferentially blocked the cephalad nerves while the axillary technique produced similar block of both cephalad and caudal nerves of the brachial plexus. Difference between groups was statistically significant, suggesting that the extent of nerve block depends on the technique of approach per se. The difference in patterns of nerve blocked by either technique could be due to the access of local anesthetic to the different components of plexus in the sheath.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信