信息超载:一个概念分析

Mohamed Amine Belabbes, I. Ruthven, Yashar Moshfeghi, Diane Rasmussen Pennington
{"title":"信息超载:一个概念分析","authors":"Mohamed Amine Belabbes, I. Ruthven, Yashar Moshfeghi, Diane Rasmussen Pennington","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2021-0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeWith the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of “information overload”. In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed.Design/methodology/approachA concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for “information overload”, which is “cognitive overload” was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA).FindingsThe themes identified from the authors’ concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload.Originality/valueThrough the authors’ concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.","PeriodicalId":402385,"journal":{"name":"J. Documentation","volume":"780 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information overload: a concept analysis\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Amine Belabbes, I. Ruthven, Yashar Moshfeghi, Diane Rasmussen Pennington\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jd-06-2021-0118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeWith the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of “information overload”. In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed.Design/methodology/approachA concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for “information overload”, which is “cognitive overload” was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA).FindingsThe themes identified from the authors’ concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload.Originality/valueThrough the authors’ concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Documentation\",\"volume\":\"780 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Documentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2021-0118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Documentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2021-0118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

随着社会向信息化和信息去中心化的转变,信息超载引起了计算机和信息科学研究界越来越大的兴趣。然而,人们对这个术语的含义没有明确的理解,虽然有许多提议的定义,但没有达成共识。这项工作的目标是定义“信息过载”的概念。为了做到这一点,使用罗杰斯的方法进行了概念分析。设计/方法/方法基于2010年至2020年9月期间发表的文件语料库,使用罗杰斯的方法进行了概念分析。“信息超载”的替代词是“认知超载”。文献语料库中信息超载文献151篇,认知超载文献10篇。所有文献均来自计算机科学和信息科学领域,检索自三个数据库:美国计算机协会(ACM)数字图书馆、SCOPUS和图书馆与信息科学文摘(LISA)。从作者的概念分析中确定的主题使我们能够提取信息过载的触发因素、表现形式和后果。他们发现触发因素与信息特征、信息需求、工作环境、个人认知能力和信息环境有关。在表现方面,他们发现信息超载在情感和认知上都有表现。信息超载的后果既有内部的,也有外部的。这些发现使他们能够给出信息过载的定义。原创性/价值通过作者的概念分析,他们能够澄清信息过载的组成部分,并提供概念的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information overload: a concept analysis
PurposeWith the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of “information overload”. In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed.Design/methodology/approachA concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for “information overload”, which is “cognitive overload” was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA).FindingsThe themes identified from the authors’ concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload.Originality/valueThrough the authors’ concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信