欧洲公民倡议和欧盟公民社会组织

J. Greenwood
{"title":"欧洲公民倡议和欧盟公民社会组织","authors":"J. Greenwood","doi":"10.1080/15705854.2012.702576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The procedural demands of the new European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) require the ‘Citizens Committees’ that host them to be backed by professional organisation. One potential source would be civil society organisations (CSOs) organised at EU level. Yet direct participatory democracy measures challenge the status of established Brussels-based non-governmental organisations (NGOs) seeking an alternative ‘civil dialogue’ between themselves and EU political institutions. The institutionalised advocacy orientation of these EU NGOs make them ill-suited to developing mass-campaigning activities, although the ECI concept will incentivise such groups to develop more direct links with those they seek to advocate for. By contrast, there is a new community of CSOs newly mobilised into EU politics by the ECI, largely from Germany and Austria, with a more political orientation than traditional EU CSOs. These organisations are progressively becoming EU institutionalised, opening Brussels outreaches and increasingly appearing on the (European) Transparency Register. Either way, the ability of groups to link EU institutions with civil society will be enhanced by the ECI.","PeriodicalId":186367,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on European Politics and Society","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"the European Citizens’ Initiative and EU Civil Society Organisations\",\"authors\":\"J. Greenwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15705854.2012.702576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The procedural demands of the new European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) require the ‘Citizens Committees’ that host them to be backed by professional organisation. One potential source would be civil society organisations (CSOs) organised at EU level. Yet direct participatory democracy measures challenge the status of established Brussels-based non-governmental organisations (NGOs) seeking an alternative ‘civil dialogue’ between themselves and EU political institutions. The institutionalised advocacy orientation of these EU NGOs make them ill-suited to developing mass-campaigning activities, although the ECI concept will incentivise such groups to develop more direct links with those they seek to advocate for. By contrast, there is a new community of CSOs newly mobilised into EU politics by the ECI, largely from Germany and Austria, with a more political orientation than traditional EU CSOs. These organisations are progressively becoming EU institutionalised, opening Brussels outreaches and increasingly appearing on the (European) Transparency Register. Either way, the ability of groups to link EU institutions with civil society will be enhanced by the ECI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on European Politics and Society\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on European Politics and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2012.702576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on European Politics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2012.702576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

新欧洲公民倡议(ECI)的程序要求要求主办他们的“公民委员会”得到专业组织的支持。一个潜在的来源是欧盟层面的公民社会组织(cso)。然而,直接参与式民主措施挑战了在布鲁塞尔建立的非政府组织(ngo)的地位,这些组织寻求在它们自己和欧盟政治机构之间进行另一种“公民对话”。尽管ECI的概念将激励这些组织与他们所倡导的对象建立更直接的联系,但这些欧盟非政府组织制度化的倡导取向使它们不适合开展大规模的运动活动。相比之下,ECI最近动员了一批新的公民社会组织参与欧盟政治,他们主要来自德国和奥地利,比传统的欧盟公民社会组织更具政治倾向。这些组织正逐渐成为欧盟的机构,在布鲁塞尔开放外联,并越来越多地出现在(欧洲)透明度登记册上。无论哪种方式,ECI都将增强各团体将欧盟机构与公民社会联系起来的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
the European Citizens’ Initiative and EU Civil Society Organisations
Abstract The procedural demands of the new European Citizens' Initiative (ECI) require the ‘Citizens Committees’ that host them to be backed by professional organisation. One potential source would be civil society organisations (CSOs) organised at EU level. Yet direct participatory democracy measures challenge the status of established Brussels-based non-governmental organisations (NGOs) seeking an alternative ‘civil dialogue’ between themselves and EU political institutions. The institutionalised advocacy orientation of these EU NGOs make them ill-suited to developing mass-campaigning activities, although the ECI concept will incentivise such groups to develop more direct links with those they seek to advocate for. By contrast, there is a new community of CSOs newly mobilised into EU politics by the ECI, largely from Germany and Austria, with a more political orientation than traditional EU CSOs. These organisations are progressively becoming EU institutionalised, opening Brussels outreaches and increasingly appearing on the (European) Transparency Register. Either way, the ability of groups to link EU institutions with civil society will be enhanced by the ECI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信