钢板螺钉与髓内弹性钉治疗青少年前臂双骨骨折的疗效比较

Ebeed Yasin
{"title":"钢板螺钉与髓内弹性钉治疗青少年前臂双骨骨折的疗效比较","authors":"Ebeed Yasin","doi":"10.4103/eoj.eoj_100_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Both bone forearm fractures are common injuries in children and adolescents. In adolescent patients, such fractures may be less frequently amenable to nonoperative management due to the decreased remodeling potential in children approaching skeletal maturity. These fractures are often managed surgically using intramedullary nails (IMNs) or plate fixation. Significant controversy exists between the use of the IMNs and plate fixation for diaphyseal both bone forearm fractures in adolescents. Objective This study aimed to evaluate plates and screws versus IMNs in the management of both bone forearm fractures in adolescents. Patients and methods Twenty patients were enrolled in a prospective study, 12 males and eight females, their ages ranging from 10 to 14 years (average 11.75). The mean follow-up duration was 13.2 months (ranging from 8 to 18 months). According to our protocol, patients with odd numbers (group A) were treated with plate and screws, and IMNs were used to treat those with even numbers (group B). Results The mean operative time in group A was 63.5 min (ranging from 55 to 75 min), while in group B, the mean operative time was 37 min (ranging from 35 to 45 min) (P<0.001). The mean time of use of an intraoperative image intensifier in group A was 2 s, ranging from 0 to 7 s. Comparatively, the mean time in group B was 57.5 s, ranging from 45 to 65 s, P value less than 0.001. The union time in both groups ranged from 6 to 8 weeks; the result was statistically nonsignificant. In terms of the supination and pronation range of motion (ROM), group A showed almost no change compared with the other side, at the final follow-up, while group B showed 15° mean loss in the supination ROM, ranging from 5° to 20°, with almost no loss in the pronation ROM (P=0.032). In terms of operative time for implant removal, the time needed to remove plates and screws ranged from 30 to 65 min (average 40 min), while the time needed for removal of elastic nails ranged from 10 to 18 min (average 12 min); the result was statistically significant. Conclusion IM nailing was found to be superior to plates and screws in the management of adolescent both bone forearm fractures in terms of operative time needed for fixation and removal. However, plates and screws had the advantage that they involved limited intraoperative exposure to the image intensifier. Level of evidence Level I.","PeriodicalId":171084,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical management of adolescent both bone forearm fractures using a plate and screws versus an intramedullary elastic nail\",\"authors\":\"Ebeed Yasin\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/eoj.eoj_100_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Both bone forearm fractures are common injuries in children and adolescents. In adolescent patients, such fractures may be less frequently amenable to nonoperative management due to the decreased remodeling potential in children approaching skeletal maturity. These fractures are often managed surgically using intramedullary nails (IMNs) or plate fixation. Significant controversy exists between the use of the IMNs and plate fixation for diaphyseal both bone forearm fractures in adolescents. Objective This study aimed to evaluate plates and screws versus IMNs in the management of both bone forearm fractures in adolescents. Patients and methods Twenty patients were enrolled in a prospective study, 12 males and eight females, their ages ranging from 10 to 14 years (average 11.75). The mean follow-up duration was 13.2 months (ranging from 8 to 18 months). According to our protocol, patients with odd numbers (group A) were treated with plate and screws, and IMNs were used to treat those with even numbers (group B). Results The mean operative time in group A was 63.5 min (ranging from 55 to 75 min), while in group B, the mean operative time was 37 min (ranging from 35 to 45 min) (P<0.001). The mean time of use of an intraoperative image intensifier in group A was 2 s, ranging from 0 to 7 s. Comparatively, the mean time in group B was 57.5 s, ranging from 45 to 65 s, P value less than 0.001. The union time in both groups ranged from 6 to 8 weeks; the result was statistically nonsignificant. In terms of the supination and pronation range of motion (ROM), group A showed almost no change compared with the other side, at the final follow-up, while group B showed 15° mean loss in the supination ROM, ranging from 5° to 20°, with almost no loss in the pronation ROM (P=0.032). In terms of operative time for implant removal, the time needed to remove plates and screws ranged from 30 to 65 min (average 40 min), while the time needed for removal of elastic nails ranged from 10 to 18 min (average 12 min); the result was statistically significant. Conclusion IM nailing was found to be superior to plates and screws in the management of adolescent both bone forearm fractures in terms of operative time needed for fixation and removal. However, plates and screws had the advantage that they involved limited intraoperative exposure to the image intensifier. Level of evidence Level I.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/eoj.eoj_100_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/eoj.eoj_100_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:两种前臂骨折都是儿童和青少年常见的损伤。在青少年患者中,由于接近骨骼成熟的儿童重塑潜力降低,此类骨折可能不太适合非手术治疗。这些骨折通常使用髓内钉(IMNs)或钢板固定进行手术治疗。在青少年前臂骨干双骨骨折中,imn和钢板固定的使用存在显著的争议。目的本研究旨在评价钢板螺钉与内固定神经网络治疗青少年前臂双骨骨折的疗效。患者与方法前瞻性研究共纳入20例患者,其中男性12例,女性8例,年龄10 ~ 14岁,平均11.75岁。平均随访时间13.2个月(8 ~ 18个月)。按照我们的方案,奇数患者(A组)采用钢板螺钉治疗,偶数患者(B组)采用IMNs治疗。结果A组平均手术时间为63.5 min (55 ~ 75 min), B组平均手术时间为37 min (35 ~ 45 min) (P<0.001)。A组术中图像增强器的平均使用时间为2 s,范围为0 ~ 7 s。相比之下,B组平均时间为57.5 s,范围为45 ~ 65 s, P值小于0.001。两组愈合时间6 ~ 8周;结果无统计学意义。在旋前和旋前活动范围(ROM)方面,A组与另一侧随访时几乎没有变化,而B组旋后活动范围平均减少15°,范围从5°到20°,旋前活动范围几乎没有减少(P=0.032)。在取出种植体的手术时间方面,取出钢板和螺钉所需时间为30 ~ 65 min(平均40 min),取出弹性钉所需时间为10 ~ 18 min(平均12 min);结果具有统计学意义。结论IM内钉治疗青少年前臂双骨骨折在固定和取出所需的手术时间上优于钢板和螺钉。然而,钢板和螺钉的优点是术中暴露在图像增强器下的时间有限。证据等级一级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical management of adolescent both bone forearm fractures using a plate and screws versus an intramedullary elastic nail
Background Both bone forearm fractures are common injuries in children and adolescents. In adolescent patients, such fractures may be less frequently amenable to nonoperative management due to the decreased remodeling potential in children approaching skeletal maturity. These fractures are often managed surgically using intramedullary nails (IMNs) or plate fixation. Significant controversy exists between the use of the IMNs and plate fixation for diaphyseal both bone forearm fractures in adolescents. Objective This study aimed to evaluate plates and screws versus IMNs in the management of both bone forearm fractures in adolescents. Patients and methods Twenty patients were enrolled in a prospective study, 12 males and eight females, their ages ranging from 10 to 14 years (average 11.75). The mean follow-up duration was 13.2 months (ranging from 8 to 18 months). According to our protocol, patients with odd numbers (group A) were treated with plate and screws, and IMNs were used to treat those with even numbers (group B). Results The mean operative time in group A was 63.5 min (ranging from 55 to 75 min), while in group B, the mean operative time was 37 min (ranging from 35 to 45 min) (P<0.001). The mean time of use of an intraoperative image intensifier in group A was 2 s, ranging from 0 to 7 s. Comparatively, the mean time in group B was 57.5 s, ranging from 45 to 65 s, P value less than 0.001. The union time in both groups ranged from 6 to 8 weeks; the result was statistically nonsignificant. In terms of the supination and pronation range of motion (ROM), group A showed almost no change compared with the other side, at the final follow-up, while group B showed 15° mean loss in the supination ROM, ranging from 5° to 20°, with almost no loss in the pronation ROM (P=0.032). In terms of operative time for implant removal, the time needed to remove plates and screws ranged from 30 to 65 min (average 40 min), while the time needed for removal of elastic nails ranged from 10 to 18 min (average 12 min); the result was statistically significant. Conclusion IM nailing was found to be superior to plates and screws in the management of adolescent both bone forearm fractures in terms of operative time needed for fixation and removal. However, plates and screws had the advantage that they involved limited intraoperative exposure to the image intensifier. Level of evidence Level I.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信