走向国际美国文化研究的对话:跨国、边界话语与公共文化

Günter H. Lenz
{"title":"走向国际美国文化研究的对话:跨国、边界话语与公共文化","authors":"Günter H. Lenz","doi":"10.1215/9780822384199-023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay discusses the recent efforts to redefine the discursive strategies and critical objectives of American Studies in the context of Lawrence Grossberg's very critical re-assessment of the triumphal success of British Cultural Studies in the U. S. during the 1990s. The New Americanists have reclaimed the historical and political dimensions of American (Culture) Studies, opened the perspective to postnational narratives, and placed their work in the wider context of American imperialism and a globalizing world. The essay points out, however, that the various attempts at \"internationalizing\" American Studies tend to be built on a unidirectional perspective that is in danger of constructing and re-appropriating the articulations of intracultural as well as of interor cross-cultural differences. As an alternative, it suggest a more radical version of dialogical cultural critique in/of American Studies that draws on the dialectics of \"border discourses\" in American multicultural critique and projects a new \"dialogics\" of International American Culture Studies, of the encounter of American and foreign scholars in a bior multidirectional joint venture, as well as briefly indicating some crucial case studies. American Studies and British Cultural Studies In the late 1960s, American Studies was in a deep crisis. It was declared intellectually bankrupt, politically reactionary, a handmaiden of American imperialism during the Cold War era, and a failure in its effort to offer an interdisciplinary understanding of American culture as a whole, past and present. ТЪе various redefinitions that were given during the 1970s and early 1980s usually replaced key terms or critical approaches that had characterized the field by their opposites without seriously reconceptualizing the formative principles and objectives of American Studies in a rapidly changing cultural and theoretical context. American Studies as an integrative study of American culture fell apart and was replaced by a sequence of politically engendered and committed interdisciplinary programs such as Black Studies, Women's Studies, Urban Studies, Popular Culture Studies, Native-American Studies, Chicano/a Studies, Asian-American Studies, Queer Studies, etc. that, however, often seemed to have to face methodological and institutional problems similar to those of the American Studies programs they rejected. Anyway, American Studies did not seem to work any longer anywhere near the frontiers of contemporary scholarship. Thus, it did not come as a surprise that when British Cultural Studies was widely discovered during the second half of the 1980s, and the famous \"Cultural Studies Now and in the Future\" conference at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1990 provided the defining moment for a triumphal success of Cultural Studies in the United States during the 1990s, it was received as another wave of traveling theory from Europe. Cultural Studies from the Birmingham Centre seemed to offer new anThis content downloaded from 157.55.39.35 on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:07:12 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms","PeriodicalId":430011,"journal":{"name":"The Futures of American Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Dialogics of International American Culture Studies: Transnationality, Border Discourses, and Public Culture(s)\",\"authors\":\"Günter H. Lenz\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/9780822384199-023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay discusses the recent efforts to redefine the discursive strategies and critical objectives of American Studies in the context of Lawrence Grossberg's very critical re-assessment of the triumphal success of British Cultural Studies in the U. S. during the 1990s. The New Americanists have reclaimed the historical and political dimensions of American (Culture) Studies, opened the perspective to postnational narratives, and placed their work in the wider context of American imperialism and a globalizing world. The essay points out, however, that the various attempts at \\\"internationalizing\\\" American Studies tend to be built on a unidirectional perspective that is in danger of constructing and re-appropriating the articulations of intracultural as well as of interor cross-cultural differences. As an alternative, it suggest a more radical version of dialogical cultural critique in/of American Studies that draws on the dialectics of \\\"border discourses\\\" in American multicultural critique and projects a new \\\"dialogics\\\" of International American Culture Studies, of the encounter of American and foreign scholars in a bior multidirectional joint venture, as well as briefly indicating some crucial case studies. American Studies and British Cultural Studies In the late 1960s, American Studies was in a deep crisis. It was declared intellectually bankrupt, politically reactionary, a handmaiden of American imperialism during the Cold War era, and a failure in its effort to offer an interdisciplinary understanding of American culture as a whole, past and present. ТЪе various redefinitions that were given during the 1970s and early 1980s usually replaced key terms or critical approaches that had characterized the field by their opposites without seriously reconceptualizing the formative principles and objectives of American Studies in a rapidly changing cultural and theoretical context. American Studies as an integrative study of American culture fell apart and was replaced by a sequence of politically engendered and committed interdisciplinary programs such as Black Studies, Women's Studies, Urban Studies, Popular Culture Studies, Native-American Studies, Chicano/a Studies, Asian-American Studies, Queer Studies, etc. that, however, often seemed to have to face methodological and institutional problems similar to those of the American Studies programs they rejected. Anyway, American Studies did not seem to work any longer anywhere near the frontiers of contemporary scholarship. Thus, it did not come as a surprise that when British Cultural Studies was widely discovered during the second half of the 1980s, and the famous \\\"Cultural Studies Now and in the Future\\\" conference at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1990 provided the defining moment for a triumphal success of Cultural Studies in the United States during the 1990s, it was received as another wave of traveling theory from Europe. Cultural Studies from the Birmingham Centre seemed to offer new anThis content downloaded from 157.55.39.35 on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:07:12 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms\",\"PeriodicalId\":430011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Futures of American Studies\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Futures of American Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384199-023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Futures of American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384199-023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文在劳伦斯·格罗斯伯格对20世纪90年代英国文化研究在美国取得的巨大成功进行了非常批判性的重新评估的背景下,讨论了最近重新定义美国研究的话语策略和关键目标的努力。新美国主义者重新审视了美国(文化)研究的历史和政治维度,打开了后国家叙事的视角,并将他们的工作置于美帝国主义和全球化世界的更广阔背景下。然而,本文指出,将美国研究“国际化”的各种尝试往往建立在一种单向的视角上,这种视角有可能构建和重新挪用文化内以及跨文化内部差异的表达。作为另一种选择,它提出了一种更激进的美国研究对话文化批判的版本,它借鉴了美国多元文化批判中“边界话语”的辩证法,并提出了一种新的美国国际文化研究的“对话”,即美国和外国学者在一个生物或多向合资企业中的相遇,并简要地指出了一些重要的案例研究。20世纪60年代末,美国研究陷入了深刻的危机。它被认为是智力上的破产,政治上的反动,是冷战时期美帝国主义的使女,未能提供对美国文化整体的跨学科理解,无论是过去还是现在。ТЪе在20世纪70年代和80年代初给出的各种重新定义通常取代了关键术语或批判性方法,这些术语或方法以其对立面来表征该领域,而没有在快速变化的文化和理论背景下认真重新概念化美国研究的形成原则和目标。作为对美国文化的综合研究的美国研究分崩离析,并被一系列政治上产生的跨学科项目所取代,如黑人研究、妇女研究、城市研究、流行文化研究、美国原住民研究、墨西哥裔美国人研究、亚裔美国人研究、酷儿研究等,然而,这些研究似乎经常不得不面对方法论和制度上的问题,类似于那些被他们拒绝的美国研究项目。无论如何,美国研究似乎在当代学术的前沿再也不起作用了。因此,当英国文化研究在20世纪80年代下半叶被广泛发现,以及1990年在伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校举行的著名的“文化研究的现在和未来”会议为20世纪90年代美国文化研究的胜利成功提供了决定性的时刻时,它被视为来自欧洲的另一波旅行理论,这并不奇怪。伯明翰中心的文化研究似乎提供了新的内容。该内容于2016年8月31日星期三05:07:12 UTC从157.55.39.35下载,所有内容须经http://about.jstor.org/terms许可
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a Dialogics of International American Culture Studies: Transnationality, Border Discourses, and Public Culture(s)
This essay discusses the recent efforts to redefine the discursive strategies and critical objectives of American Studies in the context of Lawrence Grossberg's very critical re-assessment of the triumphal success of British Cultural Studies in the U. S. during the 1990s. The New Americanists have reclaimed the historical and political dimensions of American (Culture) Studies, opened the perspective to postnational narratives, and placed their work in the wider context of American imperialism and a globalizing world. The essay points out, however, that the various attempts at "internationalizing" American Studies tend to be built on a unidirectional perspective that is in danger of constructing and re-appropriating the articulations of intracultural as well as of interor cross-cultural differences. As an alternative, it suggest a more radical version of dialogical cultural critique in/of American Studies that draws on the dialectics of "border discourses" in American multicultural critique and projects a new "dialogics" of International American Culture Studies, of the encounter of American and foreign scholars in a bior multidirectional joint venture, as well as briefly indicating some crucial case studies. American Studies and British Cultural Studies In the late 1960s, American Studies was in a deep crisis. It was declared intellectually bankrupt, politically reactionary, a handmaiden of American imperialism during the Cold War era, and a failure in its effort to offer an interdisciplinary understanding of American culture as a whole, past and present. ТЪе various redefinitions that were given during the 1970s and early 1980s usually replaced key terms or critical approaches that had characterized the field by their opposites without seriously reconceptualizing the formative principles and objectives of American Studies in a rapidly changing cultural and theoretical context. American Studies as an integrative study of American culture fell apart and was replaced by a sequence of politically engendered and committed interdisciplinary programs such as Black Studies, Women's Studies, Urban Studies, Popular Culture Studies, Native-American Studies, Chicano/a Studies, Asian-American Studies, Queer Studies, etc. that, however, often seemed to have to face methodological and institutional problems similar to those of the American Studies programs they rejected. Anyway, American Studies did not seem to work any longer anywhere near the frontiers of contemporary scholarship. Thus, it did not come as a surprise that when British Cultural Studies was widely discovered during the second half of the 1980s, and the famous "Cultural Studies Now and in the Future" conference at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1990 provided the defining moment for a triumphal success of Cultural Studies in the United States during the 1990s, it was received as another wave of traveling theory from Europe. Cultural Studies from the Birmingham Centre seemed to offer new anThis content downloaded from 157.55.39.35 on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:07:12 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信