建立和支持以人文为本的大学-产业伙伴关系:学术界的观点

Lynne Siemens
{"title":"建立和支持以人文为本的大学-产业伙伴关系:学术界的观点","authors":"Lynne Siemens","doi":"10.21810/pop.2019.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"University–industry partnerships are rare on the humanities side of campus in contrast to the sciences. As a result, little is known about these partnerships, which tend to be with libraries and other not-for-profit organizations. Using the Implementing New Knowledge Environments: Network Open Social Scholarship (INKE:NOSS) as a case study, this research examines a humanities-based university–industry partnership from the academics’ perspective. It explores the nature of the collaboration, associated benefits and challenges, and measures of success and desired outcomes. Overall, building upon several years of working with the partners, the interviewed researchers found that the benefits of collaborating outweighed the challenges. The benefits included the potential to move research towards production-orientated results. Among the many challenges, there was some hesitation about the ability to achieve publications and presentations needed for tenure and promotion. The academics contributed students, and in-kind and cash resources from their own research funds and those of the university to the partnership. At this point, the measures of success and desirable outcomes have not been quantified and instead focus on policy intervention and movement towards open social scholarship. These understandings about the nature of such a university–industry collaboration should provide a good foundation if partnership is funded.","PeriodicalId":108824,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings from the January 2019 INKE Meeting, 'Understanding and Enacting Open Scholarship'.","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building and Supporting Humanities-Based University–industry Partnerships: View from the Academics\",\"authors\":\"Lynne Siemens\",\"doi\":\"10.21810/pop.2019.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"University–industry partnerships are rare on the humanities side of campus in contrast to the sciences. As a result, little is known about these partnerships, which tend to be with libraries and other not-for-profit organizations. Using the Implementing New Knowledge Environments: Network Open Social Scholarship (INKE:NOSS) as a case study, this research examines a humanities-based university–industry partnership from the academics’ perspective. It explores the nature of the collaboration, associated benefits and challenges, and measures of success and desired outcomes. Overall, building upon several years of working with the partners, the interviewed researchers found that the benefits of collaborating outweighed the challenges. The benefits included the potential to move research towards production-orientated results. Among the many challenges, there was some hesitation about the ability to achieve publications and presentations needed for tenure and promotion. The academics contributed students, and in-kind and cash resources from their own research funds and those of the university to the partnership. At this point, the measures of success and desirable outcomes have not been quantified and instead focus on policy intervention and movement towards open social scholarship. These understandings about the nature of such a university–industry collaboration should provide a good foundation if partnership is funded.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings from the January 2019 INKE Meeting, 'Understanding and Enacting Open Scholarship'.\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings from the January 2019 INKE Meeting, 'Understanding and Enacting Open Scholarship'.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21810/pop.2019.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings from the January 2019 INKE Meeting, 'Understanding and Enacting Open Scholarship'.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21810/pop.2019.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与科学相比,大学与企业的合作在人文学科方面非常罕见。因此,人们对这些合作伙伴关系知之甚少,这些合作伙伴往往是图书馆和其他非营利组织。本研究以实施新知识环境:网络开放社会奖学金(INKE:NOSS)为例,从学者的角度考察了以人文学科为基础的大学-产业合作关系。它探讨了合作的本质,相关的利益和挑战,以及成功和预期结果的度量。总的来说,经过几年与合作伙伴的合作,接受采访的研究人员发现,合作的好处大于挑战。其好处包括有可能将研究转向面向生产的结果。在许多挑战中,有一些犹豫是否有能力获得终身职位和晋升所需的出版物和演讲。学者们从他们自己的研究基金和大学的研究基金中贡献了学生、实物和现金资源来合作。在这一点上,成功和理想结果的衡量标准并没有被量化,而是集中在政策干预和向开放社会奖学金的运动上。这些对这种校企合作性质的理解,应该为合作关系的资助提供一个良好的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building and Supporting Humanities-Based University–industry Partnerships: View from the Academics
University–industry partnerships are rare on the humanities side of campus in contrast to the sciences. As a result, little is known about these partnerships, which tend to be with libraries and other not-for-profit organizations. Using the Implementing New Knowledge Environments: Network Open Social Scholarship (INKE:NOSS) as a case study, this research examines a humanities-based university–industry partnership from the academics’ perspective. It explores the nature of the collaboration, associated benefits and challenges, and measures of success and desired outcomes. Overall, building upon several years of working with the partners, the interviewed researchers found that the benefits of collaborating outweighed the challenges. The benefits included the potential to move research towards production-orientated results. Among the many challenges, there was some hesitation about the ability to achieve publications and presentations needed for tenure and promotion. The academics contributed students, and in-kind and cash resources from their own research funds and those of the university to the partnership. At this point, the measures of success and desirable outcomes have not been quantified and instead focus on policy intervention and movement towards open social scholarship. These understandings about the nature of such a university–industry collaboration should provide a good foundation if partnership is funded.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信