这就是我:加权数字身份来源的贝叶斯方法

Juanita Blue, J. Condell, T. Lunney
{"title":"这就是我:加权数字身份来源的贝叶斯方法","authors":"Juanita Blue, J. Condell, T. Lunney","doi":"10.1109/ISSC.2019.8904941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online accounts and services have become a ubiquitous facet of modern existence. As society becomes increasingly dependent on digital services to conduct the fundamental aspects of daily life, online identities may possess the capacity to provide verification that an individual is a ‘real person’ with a ‘true’ identity. Traditionally verification of identity has been achieved by cursory examination of paper documentation and simple matching of the attributes contained therein. Improved technology and printing capacity has since reduced confidence in this type of identity documentation, highlighting the need for methods better acquainted with the digital age. A recognized challenge in utlising online accounts as proof of identification is the various levels of reliability associated with different types of accounts. This variation is based on the importance of account and the processes of verification required to initially create the account. This paper explores the application of Bayes theorem to determine the reliability of online accounts based on the account type and the attributes it contains. Bayes rule is applied subsets of attributes contained within various types of online accounts that are presented as ‘identity sources’. This seeks to demonstrate that less reliable sources such as social media accounts will produce lower trust scores than more reliable sources such as online banking. The results for which will be used to determine if digital identity sources can be relied upon in place of traditional paper identification documentation. This research and testing has been conducted as an element of a larger intelligent identity authentication system that seeks to create a solution that proves an identity is genuine via an individual's digital footprint.","PeriodicalId":312808,"journal":{"name":"2019 30th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"This is Me: A Bayesian Approach to Weighting Digital Identity Sources\",\"authors\":\"Juanita Blue, J. Condell, T. Lunney\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSC.2019.8904941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online accounts and services have become a ubiquitous facet of modern existence. As society becomes increasingly dependent on digital services to conduct the fundamental aspects of daily life, online identities may possess the capacity to provide verification that an individual is a ‘real person’ with a ‘true’ identity. Traditionally verification of identity has been achieved by cursory examination of paper documentation and simple matching of the attributes contained therein. Improved technology and printing capacity has since reduced confidence in this type of identity documentation, highlighting the need for methods better acquainted with the digital age. A recognized challenge in utlising online accounts as proof of identification is the various levels of reliability associated with different types of accounts. This variation is based on the importance of account and the processes of verification required to initially create the account. This paper explores the application of Bayes theorem to determine the reliability of online accounts based on the account type and the attributes it contains. Bayes rule is applied subsets of attributes contained within various types of online accounts that are presented as ‘identity sources’. This seeks to demonstrate that less reliable sources such as social media accounts will produce lower trust scores than more reliable sources such as online banking. The results for which will be used to determine if digital identity sources can be relied upon in place of traditional paper identification documentation. This research and testing has been conducted as an element of a larger intelligent identity authentication system that seeks to create a solution that proves an identity is genuine via an individual's digital footprint.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 30th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 30th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSC.2019.8904941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 30th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSC.2019.8904941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在线账户和服务已经成为现代生活中无处不在的一个方面。随着社会越来越依赖数字服务来进行日常生活的基本方面,在线身份可能具有验证个人是具有“真实”身份的“真人”的能力。传统的身份验证是通过粗略地检查纸质文件和简单地匹配其中包含的属性来实现的。技术和印刷能力的提高降低了人们对这类身份证件的信心,凸显了对更熟悉数字时代的方法的需求。利用网上帐户作为身份证明的一个公认的挑战是,不同类型的帐户具有不同程度的可靠性。这种变化是基于帐户的重要性和初始创建帐户所需的验证过程。本文探讨了利用贝叶斯定理根据账户类型及其包含的属性来确定在线账户的可靠性。贝叶斯规则应用于各种类型的在线帐户中包含的属性子集,这些属性被表示为“身份来源”。该研究旨在证明,社交媒体账户等不太可靠的来源会比网上银行等更可靠的来源产生更低的信任分数。其结果将用于确定数字身份来源是否可以取代传统的纸质身份证件。这项研究和测试是作为一个更大的智能身份认证系统的一个组成部分进行的,该系统旨在创建一个解决方案,通过个人的数字足迹证明身份是真实的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
This is Me: A Bayesian Approach to Weighting Digital Identity Sources
Online accounts and services have become a ubiquitous facet of modern existence. As society becomes increasingly dependent on digital services to conduct the fundamental aspects of daily life, online identities may possess the capacity to provide verification that an individual is a ‘real person’ with a ‘true’ identity. Traditionally verification of identity has been achieved by cursory examination of paper documentation and simple matching of the attributes contained therein. Improved technology and printing capacity has since reduced confidence in this type of identity documentation, highlighting the need for methods better acquainted with the digital age. A recognized challenge in utlising online accounts as proof of identification is the various levels of reliability associated with different types of accounts. This variation is based on the importance of account and the processes of verification required to initially create the account. This paper explores the application of Bayes theorem to determine the reliability of online accounts based on the account type and the attributes it contains. Bayes rule is applied subsets of attributes contained within various types of online accounts that are presented as ‘identity sources’. This seeks to demonstrate that less reliable sources such as social media accounts will produce lower trust scores than more reliable sources such as online banking. The results for which will be used to determine if digital identity sources can be relied upon in place of traditional paper identification documentation. This research and testing has been conducted as an element of a larger intelligent identity authentication system that seeks to create a solution that proves an identity is genuine via an individual's digital footprint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信