环境菌株与药典菌株生长速度的比较

Tim Sandle
{"title":"环境菌株与药典菌株生长速度的比较","authors":"Tim Sandle","doi":"10.37521/ejpps.27201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For some years there has been a regulatory drive for microbiology laboratories to use environmental isolates for media quality control and for the incorporation into method suitability studies. Where these organisms are included in testing regimes, do they take longer to grow? This paper assesses the growth rates of environmental isolates in comparison with compendial recommended cultures. The research presented here finds that environmental isolates do take slightly longer to grow compared with laboratory strains, yet this time difference was within the recommended incubation times of each test type. Therefore, microbiologists should generally expect slower growth but test methods may not need to be adapted to compensate.","PeriodicalId":300408,"journal":{"name":"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of the growth rates of environmental isolates compared with compendial strains\",\"authors\":\"Tim Sandle\",\"doi\":\"10.37521/ejpps.27201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For some years there has been a regulatory drive for microbiology laboratories to use environmental isolates for media quality control and for the incorporation into method suitability studies. Where these organisms are included in testing regimes, do they take longer to grow? This paper assesses the growth rates of environmental isolates in comparison with compendial recommended cultures. The research presented here finds that environmental isolates do take slightly longer to grow compared with laboratory strains, yet this time difference was within the recommended incubation times of each test type. Therefore, microbiologists should generally expect slower growth but test methods may not need to be adapted to compensate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37521/ejpps.27201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37521/ejpps.27201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,微生物实验室一直有一种监管驱动,要求将环境分离物用于培养基质量控制和纳入方法适用性研究。当这些生物被纳入测试制度时,它们需要更长的时间来生长吗?本文比较了环境分离菌与药典推荐培养菌的生长速度。本文提出的研究发现,与实验室菌株相比,环境分离株确实需要稍长的生长时间,但这一时间差在每种测试类型的推荐孵育时间之内。因此,微生物学家通常应该预期较慢的生长,但测试方法可能不需要调整以进行补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examination of the growth rates of environmental isolates compared with compendial strains
For some years there has been a regulatory drive for microbiology laboratories to use environmental isolates for media quality control and for the incorporation into method suitability studies. Where these organisms are included in testing regimes, do they take longer to grow? This paper assesses the growth rates of environmental isolates in comparison with compendial recommended cultures. The research presented here finds that environmental isolates do take slightly longer to grow compared with laboratory strains, yet this time difference was within the recommended incubation times of each test type. Therefore, microbiologists should generally expect slower growth but test methods may not need to be adapted to compensate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信