土耳其的城市权利和城市抵抗

Gülçin Erdi
{"title":"土耳其的城市权利和城市抵抗","authors":"Gülçin Erdi","doi":"10.4324/9781315266589-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2000s, Turkey witnesses an intensive urban transformation in metropolitan cities. This transformation led by the AKP government itself with neoliberal perspectives of urbanisation targets generally informal and/or old, dilapidated neighbourhoods located in the city centre with high estate values but occupied by low-income inhabitants belonging often to ethnic and religious minorities. \nAgainst this massive urban transformation, many local resistances flourished with different motivations and claims but the common point is that they reclaimed all a right to the city, a right to exist in the city with their everyday life habits and to access to the city’s amenities by refusing to be relocated in the peripheral areas. The objective of this chapter will be to study the dynamics of these urban resistances, the perception and the appropriation of the space by inhabitants and how the concept of the right to the city is mobilised by them. I propose to study the case of May Day neighbourhood in Istanbul which is an informal and autonomous neighbourhood created by extreme-left political organisations in 1970. The second example is the case of Dikmen Valley in Ankara created also in the same manner of May Day in 1970s but lost progressively its political identity. This neighbourhood ethnically diverse mobilised also against an urban transformation project. My aim will be to compare these two case in their comprehension of the right to the city, tools of mobilisation and perception of their neighbourhood and everyday life in the city.","PeriodicalId":344535,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Henri Lefebvre, The City and Urban Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Right to the city and urban resistance in Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Gülçin Erdi\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315266589-51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since 2000s, Turkey witnesses an intensive urban transformation in metropolitan cities. This transformation led by the AKP government itself with neoliberal perspectives of urbanisation targets generally informal and/or old, dilapidated neighbourhoods located in the city centre with high estate values but occupied by low-income inhabitants belonging often to ethnic and religious minorities. \\nAgainst this massive urban transformation, many local resistances flourished with different motivations and claims but the common point is that they reclaimed all a right to the city, a right to exist in the city with their everyday life habits and to access to the city’s amenities by refusing to be relocated in the peripheral areas. The objective of this chapter will be to study the dynamics of these urban resistances, the perception and the appropriation of the space by inhabitants and how the concept of the right to the city is mobilised by them. I propose to study the case of May Day neighbourhood in Istanbul which is an informal and autonomous neighbourhood created by extreme-left political organisations in 1970. The second example is the case of Dikmen Valley in Ankara created also in the same manner of May Day in 1970s but lost progressively its political identity. This neighbourhood ethnically diverse mobilised also against an urban transformation project. My aim will be to compare these two case in their comprehension of the right to the city, tools of mobilisation and perception of their neighbourhood and everyday life in the city.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Henri Lefebvre, The City and Urban Society\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Henri Lefebvre, The City and Urban Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266589-51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of Henri Lefebvre, The City and Urban Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266589-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2000年以来,土耳其的大城市经历了密集的城市转型。由正义与发展党(AKP)政府自己领导的这种转变,以新自由主义的城市化观点为目标,目标通常是位于市中心的非正式和/或旧的、破旧的社区,这些社区的房地产价值很高,但居住在这些社区的往往是属于少数民族和宗教少数群体的低收入居民。针对这种大规模的城市转型,许多当地的抵抗活动以不同的动机和主张蓬勃发展,但共同点是,他们收回了城市的所有权利,他们有权在城市中以日常生活习惯存在,并通过拒绝搬迁到周边地区来获得城市的便利设施。本章的目的是研究这些城市抵抗的动态,居民对空间的感知和占用,以及他们如何动员城市权利的概念。我建议研究伊斯坦布尔五一节社区的案例,这是1970年由极左政治组织创建的一个非正式的自治社区。第二个例子是安卡拉的Dikmen Valley,也是以与20世纪70年代的五一节相同的方式创建的,但逐渐失去了其政治身份。这个种族多元化的社区也动员起来反对城市改造项目。我的目的是比较这两个案例对城市权利的理解,动员工具和对社区和城市日常生活的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Right to the city and urban resistance in Turkey
Since 2000s, Turkey witnesses an intensive urban transformation in metropolitan cities. This transformation led by the AKP government itself with neoliberal perspectives of urbanisation targets generally informal and/or old, dilapidated neighbourhoods located in the city centre with high estate values but occupied by low-income inhabitants belonging often to ethnic and religious minorities. Against this massive urban transformation, many local resistances flourished with different motivations and claims but the common point is that they reclaimed all a right to the city, a right to exist in the city with their everyday life habits and to access to the city’s amenities by refusing to be relocated in the peripheral areas. The objective of this chapter will be to study the dynamics of these urban resistances, the perception and the appropriation of the space by inhabitants and how the concept of the right to the city is mobilised by them. I propose to study the case of May Day neighbourhood in Istanbul which is an informal and autonomous neighbourhood created by extreme-left political organisations in 1970. The second example is the case of Dikmen Valley in Ankara created also in the same manner of May Day in 1970s but lost progressively its political identity. This neighbourhood ethnically diverse mobilised also against an urban transformation project. My aim will be to compare these two case in their comprehension of the right to the city, tools of mobilisation and perception of their neighbourhood and everyday life in the city.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信