{"title":"挑战教师教育计划的现状","authors":"M. Romanowski, Thomas E. Oldenski","doi":"10.1080/00098659809599606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"often defining and shaping educational, political, economic, and social beliefs. In the same vein, myths play an important role in public education. It has only been over the past few decades, for example, that schooling has fallen victim to the myth of neutrality, which considers the teaching process to be a neutral, apolitical, and amoral endeavor. Influenced by a discourse centered on technocratic rationality, efficiency, and standardization of curriculum, the myth of neutrality emphasizes the technical aspects of teaching that result in presenting knowledge as a realm of objective facts. For example, textbooks and worksheets become the source of this objective knowledge. They are accepted without question by teachers, and beyond this, revered as the sole ways and means of constructing knowledge. The result is the reduction of \"moral, aesthetic, educational and political issues to technical problems; why and what are reduced to how\" (Bullough and Goldstein 1984, 44). In turn, teachers fail to address controversial issues and moral dilemmas. Instead, emphasis is placed on the pragmatics of how to and what works. This practice has reduced teachers to technicians who are more concerned with the mastering and refining of teaching methodologies than with \"transforming many of the basic cultural institutions and belief systems\" (Purpel 1989, 3).","PeriodicalId":339545,"journal":{"name":"The Clearing House","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging the Status Quo of Teacher Education Programs\",\"authors\":\"M. Romanowski, Thomas E. Oldenski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00098659809599606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"often defining and shaping educational, political, economic, and social beliefs. In the same vein, myths play an important role in public education. It has only been over the past few decades, for example, that schooling has fallen victim to the myth of neutrality, which considers the teaching process to be a neutral, apolitical, and amoral endeavor. Influenced by a discourse centered on technocratic rationality, efficiency, and standardization of curriculum, the myth of neutrality emphasizes the technical aspects of teaching that result in presenting knowledge as a realm of objective facts. For example, textbooks and worksheets become the source of this objective knowledge. They are accepted without question by teachers, and beyond this, revered as the sole ways and means of constructing knowledge. The result is the reduction of \\\"moral, aesthetic, educational and political issues to technical problems; why and what are reduced to how\\\" (Bullough and Goldstein 1984, 44). In turn, teachers fail to address controversial issues and moral dilemmas. Instead, emphasis is placed on the pragmatics of how to and what works. This practice has reduced teachers to technicians who are more concerned with the mastering and refining of teaching methodologies than with \\\"transforming many of the basic cultural institutions and belief systems\\\" (Purpel 1989, 3).\",\"PeriodicalId\":339545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Clearing House\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Clearing House\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00098659809599606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Clearing House","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00098659809599606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
经常定义和塑造教育、政治、经济和社会信仰。同样,神话在公共教育中也扮演着重要的角色。例如,只是在过去的几十年里,学校教育才成为中立神话的牺牲品,这种神话认为教学过程是一种中立的、非政治的、非道德的努力。受以技术官僚理性、效率和课程标准化为中心的话语的影响,中性神话强调教学的技术方面,从而将知识呈现为客观事实的领域。例如,教科书和工作表成为这种客观知识的来源。它们被老师们毫无疑问地接受,除此之外,它们还被尊为构建知识的唯一途径和手段。其结果是将“道德、美学、教育和政治问题简化为技术问题;为什么和什么被简化为如何”(Bullough and Goldstein 1984, 44)。反过来,教师无法解决有争议的问题和道德困境。相反,重点放在如何做和什么有效的语用学上。这种做法使教师沦为技术人员,他们更关心掌握和完善教学方法,而不是“改变许多基本的文化制度和信仰体系”(Purpel 1989, 3)。
Challenging the Status Quo of Teacher Education Programs
often defining and shaping educational, political, economic, and social beliefs. In the same vein, myths play an important role in public education. It has only been over the past few decades, for example, that schooling has fallen victim to the myth of neutrality, which considers the teaching process to be a neutral, apolitical, and amoral endeavor. Influenced by a discourse centered on technocratic rationality, efficiency, and standardization of curriculum, the myth of neutrality emphasizes the technical aspects of teaching that result in presenting knowledge as a realm of objective facts. For example, textbooks and worksheets become the source of this objective knowledge. They are accepted without question by teachers, and beyond this, revered as the sole ways and means of constructing knowledge. The result is the reduction of "moral, aesthetic, educational and political issues to technical problems; why and what are reduced to how" (Bullough and Goldstein 1984, 44). In turn, teachers fail to address controversial issues and moral dilemmas. Instead, emphasis is placed on the pragmatics of how to and what works. This practice has reduced teachers to technicians who are more concerned with the mastering and refining of teaching methodologies than with "transforming many of the basic cultural institutions and belief systems" (Purpel 1989, 3).