巴西里贝奥普雷图实施社区康复计划的预期障碍

R. C. Fiorati, R.Y.D. Carretta, Karine Pereira Joaquim, A. Placeres, T. Jesus
{"title":"巴西里贝<s:1>奥普雷图实施社区康复计划的预期障碍","authors":"R. C. Fiorati, R.Y.D. Carretta, Karine Pereira Joaquim, A. Placeres, T. Jesus","doi":"10.5463/DCID.V29I1.701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Disability is a global health and a global development concern. To address both issues, a community-based rehabilitation (CBR) approach is increasingly recommended to meet a spectrum of needs, especially for people with disabilities. It is first necessary to understand the perceptions of local, frontline providers, in order to design effective measures for implementing CBR programmes. This paper aimed to understand the conceptions of Primary Healthcare Providers (PHPs) - serving a sub-urban, socially-vulnerable territory in Brazil - about: 1) disability, 2) rehabilitation, and 3) the possible local implementation of a CBR strategy, including any anticipated barriers. Method: Cross-sectional, exploratory qualitative research was based on focus groups conducted between 2013 and 2016. It involved a total of 78 PHPs serving the western region of the Ribeirao Preto municipality in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Data analysis was based on Habermas’ critical hermeneutics approach. Results: PHPs understood disability mostly within the biomedical paradigm. Similarly, the predominant conception of rehabilitation was focussed on enabling individuals’ capacity, more than their environment. For local CBR implementation, the barriers that were anticipated were: 1) difficulties in managing and running action across sectors, and 2) the broader socio-political environment that hardly empowers civil society and is affected by power differentials. Conclusion and Implications: While local PHPs identified important CBR implementation barriers which are contextual in nature, the predominant conceptions of disability and rehabilitation (i.e., biomedical, impairments-based) also act as a barrier. Contextual and cognitive barriers must both be addressed when envisioning a local CBR implementation.","PeriodicalId":127712,"journal":{"name":"Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anticipated Barriers to Implementation of Community-Based Rehabilitation\\n in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil\",\"authors\":\"R. C. Fiorati, R.Y.D. Carretta, Karine Pereira Joaquim, A. Placeres, T. Jesus\",\"doi\":\"10.5463/DCID.V29I1.701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Disability is a global health and a global development concern. To address both issues, a community-based rehabilitation (CBR) approach is increasingly recommended to meet a spectrum of needs, especially for people with disabilities. It is first necessary to understand the perceptions of local, frontline providers, in order to design effective measures for implementing CBR programmes. This paper aimed to understand the conceptions of Primary Healthcare Providers (PHPs) - serving a sub-urban, socially-vulnerable territory in Brazil - about: 1) disability, 2) rehabilitation, and 3) the possible local implementation of a CBR strategy, including any anticipated barriers. Method: Cross-sectional, exploratory qualitative research was based on focus groups conducted between 2013 and 2016. It involved a total of 78 PHPs serving the western region of the Ribeirao Preto municipality in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Data analysis was based on Habermas’ critical hermeneutics approach. Results: PHPs understood disability mostly within the biomedical paradigm. Similarly, the predominant conception of rehabilitation was focussed on enabling individuals’ capacity, more than their environment. For local CBR implementation, the barriers that were anticipated were: 1) difficulties in managing and running action across sectors, and 2) the broader socio-political environment that hardly empowers civil society and is affected by power differentials. Conclusion and Implications: While local PHPs identified important CBR implementation barriers which are contextual in nature, the predominant conceptions of disability and rehabilitation (i.e., biomedical, impairments-based) also act as a barrier. Contextual and cognitive barriers must both be addressed when envisioning a local CBR implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5463/DCID.V29I1.701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5463/DCID.V29I1.701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:残疾是一个全球健康和全球发展问题。为了解决这两个问题,越来越多的人建议采用基于社区的康复(CBR)方法,以满足各种需求,特别是残疾人的需求。首先有必要了解当地一线提供者的看法,以便设计有效的措施来实施CBR计划。本文旨在了解初级卫生保健提供者(PHPs)的概念-服务于巴西的郊区,社会脆弱地区-关于:1)残疾,2)康复,以及3)当地实施CBR战略的可能性,包括任何预期的障碍。方法:在2013 - 2016年进行焦点小组调查的基础上,采用横断面、探索性质的研究方法。它涉及总共78个初级保健服务设施,服务于巴西圣保罗市ribeiro Preto市西部地区。数据分析基于哈贝马斯的批判解释学方法。结果:PHPs大多在生物医学范式中理解残疾。同样,康复的主要概念侧重于增强个人的能力,而不是他们的环境。对于地方CBR实施,预期的障碍是:1)管理和运行跨部门行动的困难;2)更广泛的社会政治环境难以赋予公民社会权力,并受到权力差异的影响。结论和意义:虽然当地PHPs确定了重要的CBR实施障碍,但主要的残疾和康复概念(即生物医学,基于损伤的概念)也起到了障碍的作用。在设想本地CBR实现时,必须同时解决上下文和认知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anticipated Barriers to Implementation of Community-Based Rehabilitation in Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
Purpose: Disability is a global health and a global development concern. To address both issues, a community-based rehabilitation (CBR) approach is increasingly recommended to meet a spectrum of needs, especially for people with disabilities. It is first necessary to understand the perceptions of local, frontline providers, in order to design effective measures for implementing CBR programmes. This paper aimed to understand the conceptions of Primary Healthcare Providers (PHPs) - serving a sub-urban, socially-vulnerable territory in Brazil - about: 1) disability, 2) rehabilitation, and 3) the possible local implementation of a CBR strategy, including any anticipated barriers. Method: Cross-sectional, exploratory qualitative research was based on focus groups conducted between 2013 and 2016. It involved a total of 78 PHPs serving the western region of the Ribeirao Preto municipality in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Data analysis was based on Habermas’ critical hermeneutics approach. Results: PHPs understood disability mostly within the biomedical paradigm. Similarly, the predominant conception of rehabilitation was focussed on enabling individuals’ capacity, more than their environment. For local CBR implementation, the barriers that were anticipated were: 1) difficulties in managing and running action across sectors, and 2) the broader socio-political environment that hardly empowers civil society and is affected by power differentials. Conclusion and Implications: While local PHPs identified important CBR implementation barriers which are contextual in nature, the predominant conceptions of disability and rehabilitation (i.e., biomedical, impairments-based) also act as a barrier. Contextual and cognitive barriers must both be addressed when envisioning a local CBR implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信