各种线性判别分析技术在可重复使用运载火箭故障诊断中的比较

Akilez Krishnamurthy A., M. Belur, D. Chakraborty
{"title":"各种线性判别分析技术在可重复使用运载火箭故障诊断中的比较","authors":"Akilez Krishnamurthy A., M. Belur, D. Chakraborty","doi":"10.1109/CDC.2011.6161032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we use Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) techniques to diagnose Reaction Control System (RCS) thruster faults in a Re-usable Launch Vehicle (RLV) upon re-enrty. An RCS thruster operates in binary mode i.e. either ON or OFF. A mode is a particular combination of thruster ON/OFF values which is commanded by the controller. Different Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) techniques like CLDA (Classical LDA), FSLDA (Foley- Sammon LDA), ULDA (Uncorrelated LDA) are implemented in Matlab and used here to estimate the mode in which the vehicle lies based on the double derivative of pitch, roll and yaw angles. If the estimated mode is not same as the commanded mode then it implies a fault. Misclassification percentage of each of the LDA techniques with respect to percentage of training samples used, number of loading vectors, number of nearest modes and number of instances dropped after a mode change has occurred are evaluated and are compared to decide the one that suits the application. A thorough comparison of the three LDA techniques brings out a contrasting conclusion: unlike reported in LDA literature, CLDA performs better than FSLDA and ULDA for this RCS fault application, though FSLDA and ULDA are advanced variants of the CLDA.","PeriodicalId":360068,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of various linear discriminant analysis techniques for fault diagnosis of Re-usable Launch Vehicle\",\"authors\":\"Akilez Krishnamurthy A., M. Belur, D. Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CDC.2011.6161032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we use Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) techniques to diagnose Reaction Control System (RCS) thruster faults in a Re-usable Launch Vehicle (RLV) upon re-enrty. An RCS thruster operates in binary mode i.e. either ON or OFF. A mode is a particular combination of thruster ON/OFF values which is commanded by the controller. Different Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) techniques like CLDA (Classical LDA), FSLDA (Foley- Sammon LDA), ULDA (Uncorrelated LDA) are implemented in Matlab and used here to estimate the mode in which the vehicle lies based on the double derivative of pitch, roll and yaw angles. If the estimated mode is not same as the commanded mode then it implies a fault. Misclassification percentage of each of the LDA techniques with respect to percentage of training samples used, number of loading vectors, number of nearest modes and number of instances dropped after a mode change has occurred are evaluated and are compared to decide the one that suits the application. A thorough comparison of the three LDA techniques brings out a contrasting conclusion: unlike reported in LDA literature, CLDA performs better than FSLDA and ULDA for this RCS fault application, though FSLDA and ULDA are advanced variants of the CLDA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2011.6161032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2011.6161032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文采用线性判别分析(LDA)技术对可重复使用运载火箭(RLV)再入时的反应控制系统(RCS)推进器故障进行诊断。RCS推进器工作在二进制模式,即开或关。模式是由控制器命令的推力器开/关值的特定组合。不同的线性判别分析(LDA)技术,如CLDA (Classical LDA), FSLDA (Foley- Sammon LDA), ULDA (uncorrelation LDA)在Matlab中实现,并在这里使用基于俯仰角、横摇角和偏航角的双导数来估计车辆所处的模式。如果估计模式与命令模式不相同,则意味着存在故障。每一种LDA技术相对于使用的训练样本的百分比、加载向量的数量、最近模式的数量和模式改变后下降的实例数量的错误分类百分比被评估并进行比较,以决定适合应用程序的方法。通过对三种LDA技术的全面比较,得出了一个截然不同的结论:与LDA文献报道的不同,CLDA在RCS故障应用中的表现优于FSLDA和ULDA,尽管FSLDA和ULDA是CLDA的高级变体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of various linear discriminant analysis techniques for fault diagnosis of Re-usable Launch Vehicle
In this paper, we use Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) techniques to diagnose Reaction Control System (RCS) thruster faults in a Re-usable Launch Vehicle (RLV) upon re-enrty. An RCS thruster operates in binary mode i.e. either ON or OFF. A mode is a particular combination of thruster ON/OFF values which is commanded by the controller. Different Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) techniques like CLDA (Classical LDA), FSLDA (Foley- Sammon LDA), ULDA (Uncorrelated LDA) are implemented in Matlab and used here to estimate the mode in which the vehicle lies based on the double derivative of pitch, roll and yaw angles. If the estimated mode is not same as the commanded mode then it implies a fault. Misclassification percentage of each of the LDA techniques with respect to percentage of training samples used, number of loading vectors, number of nearest modes and number of instances dropped after a mode change has occurred are evaluated and are compared to decide the one that suits the application. A thorough comparison of the three LDA techniques brings out a contrasting conclusion: unlike reported in LDA literature, CLDA performs better than FSLDA and ULDA for this RCS fault application, though FSLDA and ULDA are advanced variants of the CLDA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信