电力系统安全评估中${n}$ -1-1分析的系统方法

Parag Mitra, V. Vittal, B. Keel, Jenish M. Mistry
{"title":"电力系统安全评估中${n}$ -1-1分析的系统方法","authors":"Parag Mitra, V. Vittal, B. Keel, Jenish M. Mistry","doi":"10.1109/JPETS.2016.2546282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cascading outages can have a catastrophic impact on power systems. One such recent incident was the September 8, 2011 blackout that affected San Diego and large parts of the southwestern United States. To prepare for such events, the NERC transmission planning standards require utilities to plan for <inline-formula> <tex-math notation=\"LaTeX\">${n}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-1-1 outages. However, such analyses can be computationally burdensome for any realistic power system owing to the staggering number of possible <inline-formula> <tex-math notation=\"LaTeX\">${n}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-1-1 contingencies. This paper proposes a systematic approach to analyze <inline-formula> <tex-math notation=\"LaTeX\">${n}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-1-1 contingencies in a computationally tractable manner for power system security assessment. The proposed approach addresses both static and dynamic security assessment. The proposed methods have been tested on the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) system. The test results show that a substantial reduction in computational effort is achieved by implementing these methods for an <inline-formula> <tex-math notation=\"LaTeX\">${n}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-1-1 contingency analysis. In addition, the reliability of the proposed methods is evaluated by an exhaustive contingency analysis.","PeriodicalId":170601,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Power and Energy Technology Systems Journal","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Approach to ${n}$ -1-1 Analysis for Power System Security Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Parag Mitra, V. Vittal, B. Keel, Jenish M. Mistry\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JPETS.2016.2546282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cascading outages can have a catastrophic impact on power systems. One such recent incident was the September 8, 2011 blackout that affected San Diego and large parts of the southwestern United States. To prepare for such events, the NERC transmission planning standards require utilities to plan for <inline-formula> <tex-math notation=\\\"LaTeX\\\">${n}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-1-1 outages. However, such analyses can be computationally burdensome for any realistic power system owing to the staggering number of possible <inline-formula> <tex-math notation=\\\"LaTeX\\\">${n}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-1-1 contingencies. This paper proposes a systematic approach to analyze <inline-formula> <tex-math notation=\\\"LaTeX\\\">${n}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-1-1 contingencies in a computationally tractable manner for power system security assessment. The proposed approach addresses both static and dynamic security assessment. The proposed methods have been tested on the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) system. The test results show that a substantial reduction in computational effort is achieved by implementing these methods for an <inline-formula> <tex-math notation=\\\"LaTeX\\\">${n}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-1-1 contingency analysis. In addition, the reliability of the proposed methods is evaluated by an exhaustive contingency analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Power and Energy Technology Systems Journal\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Power and Energy Technology Systems Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/JPETS.2016.2546282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Power and Energy Technology Systems Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JPETS.2016.2546282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

级联停电会对电力系统造成灾难性的影响。最近的一个事件是2011年9月8日的停电,影响了圣地亚哥和美国西南部的大部分地区。为应对此类事件,NERC输电规划标准要求公用事业公司对${n}$ -1-1停电进行规划。然而,由于可能的${n}$ -1-1意外事件的数量惊人,这种分析对于任何实际的电力系统来说都是计算上的负担。本文提出了一种系统的、计算易于处理的${n}$ -1-1突发事件分析方法,用于电力系统安全评估。提出的方法同时处理静态和动态安全评估。所提出的方法已在西部电力协调委员会(WECC)系统上进行了测试。测试结果表明,通过对${n}$ -1-1偶然性分析实现这些方法,大大减少了计算工作量。此外,通过详尽的偶然性分析对所提出方法的可靠性进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Approach to ${n}$ -1-1 Analysis for Power System Security Assessment
Cascading outages can have a catastrophic impact on power systems. One such recent incident was the September 8, 2011 blackout that affected San Diego and large parts of the southwestern United States. To prepare for such events, the NERC transmission planning standards require utilities to plan for ${n}$ -1-1 outages. However, such analyses can be computationally burdensome for any realistic power system owing to the staggering number of possible ${n}$ -1-1 contingencies. This paper proposes a systematic approach to analyze ${n}$ -1-1 contingencies in a computationally tractable manner for power system security assessment. The proposed approach addresses both static and dynamic security assessment. The proposed methods have been tested on the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) system. The test results show that a substantial reduction in computational effort is achieved by implementing these methods for an ${n}$ -1-1 contingency analysis. In addition, the reliability of the proposed methods is evaluated by an exhaustive contingency analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信