能源税收和可再生能源:在实验环境中对激励、框架效应和公正观念的测试

R. Menges, Stefan Traub
{"title":"能源税收和可再生能源:在实验环境中对激励、框架效应和公正观念的测试","authors":"R. Menges, Stefan Traub","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2008.4579064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an experimental investigation of individual preferences for the consumption of green electricity under alternative payment vehicles for the promotion of renewables. The experimental design involves individual choice treatments as well as public choice treatments. We study differences in subjectspsila demand behaviour for green electricity with respect to free-riding, crowding-out effects and some other behavioral effects such as fiscal illusion. Our data highlight the large extent of free-riding in the private provision of the public good ldquoenvironmental qualityrdquo. Under the public choice treatments, subjects are willing to pay far higher contributions to green electricity than under the individual choice treatments. Moreover, regression analysis shows the sensitivity of average WTP to some subjective fiscal variables and identifies crowding-in as well as crowding-out effects. The conclusion can be drawn that individuals prefer binding collective contributions rather than individual market-driven activities in this field.","PeriodicalId":118618,"journal":{"name":"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy taxation and renewable energy: Testing for incentives, framing effects and perceptions of justice in experimental settings\",\"authors\":\"R. Menges, Stefan Traub\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2008.4579064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an experimental investigation of individual preferences for the consumption of green electricity under alternative payment vehicles for the promotion of renewables. The experimental design involves individual choice treatments as well as public choice treatments. We study differences in subjectspsila demand behaviour for green electricity with respect to free-riding, crowding-out effects and some other behavioral effects such as fiscal illusion. Our data highlight the large extent of free-riding in the private provision of the public good ldquoenvironmental qualityrdquo. Under the public choice treatments, subjects are willing to pay far higher contributions to green electricity than under the individual choice treatments. Moreover, regression analysis shows the sensitivity of average WTP to some subjective fiscal variables and identifies crowding-in as well as crowding-out effects. The conclusion can be drawn that individuals prefer binding collective contributions rather than individual market-driven activities in this field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2008.4579064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2008.4579064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文提出了一项实验研究,在促进可再生能源的替代支付工具下,个人对绿色电力消费的偏好。实验设计包括个人选择处理和公共选择处理。我们从搭便车、挤出效应和其他一些行为效应(如财政错觉)等方面研究了受试者对绿色电力需求行为的差异。我们的数据突出了私人在提供公共产品和环境质量方面的搭便车现象。在公共选择处理下,受试者愿意为绿色电力支付远高于个人选择处理下的贡献。此外,回归分析显示了平均WTP对一些主观财政变量的敏感性,并确定了挤出效应和挤出效应。可以得出的结论是,在这一领域,个人更喜欢有约束力的集体贡献,而不是个人市场驱动的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy taxation and renewable energy: Testing for incentives, framing effects and perceptions of justice in experimental settings
This paper presents an experimental investigation of individual preferences for the consumption of green electricity under alternative payment vehicles for the promotion of renewables. The experimental design involves individual choice treatments as well as public choice treatments. We study differences in subjectspsila demand behaviour for green electricity with respect to free-riding, crowding-out effects and some other behavioral effects such as fiscal illusion. Our data highlight the large extent of free-riding in the private provision of the public good ldquoenvironmental qualityrdquo. Under the public choice treatments, subjects are willing to pay far higher contributions to green electricity than under the individual choice treatments. Moreover, regression analysis shows the sensitivity of average WTP to some subjective fiscal variables and identifies crowding-in as well as crowding-out effects. The conclusion can be drawn that individuals prefer binding collective contributions rather than individual market-driven activities in this field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信