约翰·戈特弗里德·赫尔德:启蒙人类学与“寄生植物”的犹太人

C. Niekerk
{"title":"约翰·戈特弗里德·赫尔德:启蒙人类学与“寄生植物”的犹太人","authors":"C. Niekerk","doi":"10.1093/leobaeck/ybac007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Buffon’s ‘Histoire naturelle de l’homme’, published in volumes two and three of the Histoire naturelle (1749), was key to the development of a new material history of humankind with scientific ambitions that wanted to understand humans as part of natural history and eventually would be called ‘anthropology’. Buffon understands humanity as consisting of one species, to which the same natural laws apply as for any other species. He understands human diversity as the product of space and time; because of geographical and climatological factors, humans develop differently in different parts of the world. Among German intellectuals, Johann Gottfried Herder (1744–1803) is a key figure in promoting Buffon’s thinking, in particular by assigning a central role to the concept of ‘culture’. The following essay focuses on the role the image of Jews plays in the emerging intertwined discourses of natural history and anthropology during the second half of the eighteenth century as it manifests itself in Herder’s writings. Herder’s views of Jews are highly contradictory. While he is respectful of their history and culture, he also refers to them in derogatory terms, calling them twice in the Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit a ‘parasitic plant’. To understand Herder’s ambiguity, his views of Jews are traced back to the premises underlying his thinking in natural history and anthropology.","PeriodicalId":391272,"journal":{"name":"The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Johann Gottfried Herder, Enlightenment Anthropology, and the Jew as a ‘Parasitic Plant’\",\"authors\":\"C. Niekerk\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/leobaeck/ybac007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Buffon’s ‘Histoire naturelle de l’homme’, published in volumes two and three of the Histoire naturelle (1749), was key to the development of a new material history of humankind with scientific ambitions that wanted to understand humans as part of natural history and eventually would be called ‘anthropology’. Buffon understands humanity as consisting of one species, to which the same natural laws apply as for any other species. He understands human diversity as the product of space and time; because of geographical and climatological factors, humans develop differently in different parts of the world. Among German intellectuals, Johann Gottfried Herder (1744–1803) is a key figure in promoting Buffon’s thinking, in particular by assigning a central role to the concept of ‘culture’. The following essay focuses on the role the image of Jews plays in the emerging intertwined discourses of natural history and anthropology during the second half of the eighteenth century as it manifests itself in Herder’s writings. Herder’s views of Jews are highly contradictory. While he is respectful of their history and culture, he also refers to them in derogatory terms, calling them twice in the Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit a ‘parasitic plant’. To understand Herder’s ambiguity, his views of Jews are traced back to the premises underlying his thinking in natural history and anthropology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/leobaeck/ybac007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/leobaeck/ybac007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

布冯的《人的自然史》(Histoire naturelle de l ' homme)出版于《自然史》(Histoire naturelle, 1749)第二卷和第三卷,是发展一种新的人类物质历史的关键,它具有科学野心,想把人类作为自然史的一部分来理解,最终被称为“人类学”。布冯认为人类是由一个物种组成的,同样的自然法则适用于任何其他物种。他认为人类的多样性是空间和时间的产物;由于地理和气候因素,人类在世界不同地区的发展是不同的。在德国知识分子中,约翰·戈特弗里德·赫尔德(Johann Gottfried Herder, 1744-1803)是推动布冯思想的关键人物,特别是他赋予了“文化”概念核心地位。下面的文章主要关注犹太人的形象在十八世纪下半叶自然历史和人类学的新兴交织的话语中所扮演的角色,因为它在赫尔德的著作中表现出来。赫尔德对犹太人的看法是非常矛盾的。虽然他尊重他们的历史和文化,但他也用贬义词来指代他们,在《哲学思想》(Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit)中两次称他们为“寄生植物”。为了理解Herder的模棱两可,他对犹太人的看法可以追溯到他在自然史和人类学中思考的前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Johann Gottfried Herder, Enlightenment Anthropology, and the Jew as a ‘Parasitic Plant’
Buffon’s ‘Histoire naturelle de l’homme’, published in volumes two and three of the Histoire naturelle (1749), was key to the development of a new material history of humankind with scientific ambitions that wanted to understand humans as part of natural history and eventually would be called ‘anthropology’. Buffon understands humanity as consisting of one species, to which the same natural laws apply as for any other species. He understands human diversity as the product of space and time; because of geographical and climatological factors, humans develop differently in different parts of the world. Among German intellectuals, Johann Gottfried Herder (1744–1803) is a key figure in promoting Buffon’s thinking, in particular by assigning a central role to the concept of ‘culture’. The following essay focuses on the role the image of Jews plays in the emerging intertwined discourses of natural history and anthropology during the second half of the eighteenth century as it manifests itself in Herder’s writings. Herder’s views of Jews are highly contradictory. While he is respectful of their history and culture, he also refers to them in derogatory terms, calling them twice in the Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit a ‘parasitic plant’. To understand Herder’s ambiguity, his views of Jews are traced back to the premises underlying his thinking in natural history and anthropology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信