Cu-Sn滑动键中锡挤压的密封框架几何研究

P. Papatzacos, N. Tiwary, N. Hoivik, Hoang-Vu Nguyen, A. Roy, K. Aasmundtveit
{"title":"Cu-Sn滑动键中锡挤压的密封框架几何研究","authors":"P. Papatzacos, N. Tiwary, N. Hoivik, Hoang-Vu Nguyen, A. Roy, K. Aasmundtveit","doi":"10.23919/empc53418.2021.9584990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cu-Sn SLID is an increasingly popular bonding technique with applications in such as hermetic sealing of microbolometers. A moderate bonding pressure is necessary to compensate for the surface roughness of the electroplated layers and to break the Sn oxide layer, thereby reducing the risk of voiding. However, such bonding pressures increase the risk for Sn squeeze-out during the bonding process, which has the potential to destroy MEMS or ROIC devices. To prevent this potential issue, an alternative bondline geometry consisting of 3x50µm wide bond rails and 25µm wide gaps was manufactured and compared to a continuous 200µm bondline by using nondestructive IR imaging, cross-sectional microscopy, and die-shear testing. High shear strength values of 31±9MPa and 43±18MPa were obtained for continuous and railed seal frames respectively. The Sn squeeze-out distance beyond the intended bondline was, on average, reduced by 60% when the railed geometry is employed. A reduction in peak squeeze-out distance from 188µm to 54µm was also observed.","PeriodicalId":348887,"journal":{"name":"2021 23rd European Microelectronics and Packaging Conference & Exhibition (EMPC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of seal frame geometry on Sn squeeze-out in Cu-Sn SLID bonds\",\"authors\":\"P. Papatzacos, N. Tiwary, N. Hoivik, Hoang-Vu Nguyen, A. Roy, K. Aasmundtveit\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/empc53418.2021.9584990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cu-Sn SLID is an increasingly popular bonding technique with applications in such as hermetic sealing of microbolometers. A moderate bonding pressure is necessary to compensate for the surface roughness of the electroplated layers and to break the Sn oxide layer, thereby reducing the risk of voiding. However, such bonding pressures increase the risk for Sn squeeze-out during the bonding process, which has the potential to destroy MEMS or ROIC devices. To prevent this potential issue, an alternative bondline geometry consisting of 3x50µm wide bond rails and 25µm wide gaps was manufactured and compared to a continuous 200µm bondline by using nondestructive IR imaging, cross-sectional microscopy, and die-shear testing. High shear strength values of 31±9MPa and 43±18MPa were obtained for continuous and railed seal frames respectively. The Sn squeeze-out distance beyond the intended bondline was, on average, reduced by 60% when the railed geometry is employed. A reduction in peak squeeze-out distance from 188µm to 54µm was also observed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 23rd European Microelectronics and Packaging Conference & Exhibition (EMPC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 23rd European Microelectronics and Packaging Conference & Exhibition (EMPC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/empc53418.2021.9584990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 23rd European Microelectronics and Packaging Conference & Exhibition (EMPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/empc53418.2021.9584990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

Cu-Sn slip是一种越来越流行的键合技术,应用于微测热计的密封。适度的键合压力是必要的,以补偿电镀层的表面粗糙度,并打破氧化锡层,从而减少漏电的风险。然而,这种键合压力增加了在键合过程中锡被挤出的风险,这有可能破坏MEMS或ROIC器件。为了防止这种潜在的问题,我们制造了由3x50 μ m宽的键轨和25 μ m宽的间隙组成的另一种键合线几何形状,并通过无损红外成像、横截面显微镜和模切测试与连续的200 μ m键合线进行了比较。连续密封框架和轨道密封框架的抗剪强度分别为31±9MPa和43±18MPa。当采用轨道几何结构时,超出预期结合线的Sn挤压距离平均减少了60%。峰值挤压距离从188µm减少到54µm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of seal frame geometry on Sn squeeze-out in Cu-Sn SLID bonds
Cu-Sn SLID is an increasingly popular bonding technique with applications in such as hermetic sealing of microbolometers. A moderate bonding pressure is necessary to compensate for the surface roughness of the electroplated layers and to break the Sn oxide layer, thereby reducing the risk of voiding. However, such bonding pressures increase the risk for Sn squeeze-out during the bonding process, which has the potential to destroy MEMS or ROIC devices. To prevent this potential issue, an alternative bondline geometry consisting of 3x50µm wide bond rails and 25µm wide gaps was manufactured and compared to a continuous 200µm bondline by using nondestructive IR imaging, cross-sectional microscopy, and die-shear testing. High shear strength values of 31±9MPa and 43±18MPa were obtained for continuous and railed seal frames respectively. The Sn squeeze-out distance beyond the intended bondline was, on average, reduced by 60% when the railed geometry is employed. A reduction in peak squeeze-out distance from 188µm to 54µm was also observed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信