基于学业记分卡和层次分析法的高等教育绩效评价分析

Titus Kristanto, Walid Maulana Hadiansyah, M. Nasrullah
{"title":"基于学业记分卡和层次分析法的高等教育绩效评价分析","authors":"Titus Kristanto, Walid Maulana Hadiansyah, M. Nasrullah","doi":"10.1109/ICIC50835.2020.9288628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher education has an important role in educating the nation's life through education. The higher education management process must have a standardization that has been determined in accordance with Permenristekdikti Number 44 of 2015 concerning National Higher Education Standards. To achieve the quality of higher education performance, it is necessary to rank the accreditation of study programs and higher education according to Permenristekdikti Number 32 of 2016 concerning Accreditation of Study Programs and Higher Education. The purpose of this study was to analyze comprehensive higher education performance measurements. This research method uses the Academic Scorecard approach with the Analytical Hierarchy Process. The Academic Scorecard method used is a combination of Permenristekdikti Number 44 of 2015 in the form of determining from each cluster, while data processing uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process in the form of decision making with several criteria. The results of the research are the level of importance of Academic Management Perspective of 16.79%, Stakeholder Perspective 19.73%, Internal Business Process Perspective 57.45%, and Innovation and Learning Perspective 55.52%. Meanwhile, from the Academic Scorecard, the perspective attainment level reached 41.72%.","PeriodicalId":413610,"journal":{"name":"2020 Fifth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)","volume":"51 Suppl 53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Higher Education Performance Measurement Using Academic Scorecard and Analytical Hierarchy Process\",\"authors\":\"Titus Kristanto, Walid Maulana Hadiansyah, M. Nasrullah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIC50835.2020.9288628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Higher education has an important role in educating the nation's life through education. The higher education management process must have a standardization that has been determined in accordance with Permenristekdikti Number 44 of 2015 concerning National Higher Education Standards. To achieve the quality of higher education performance, it is necessary to rank the accreditation of study programs and higher education according to Permenristekdikti Number 32 of 2016 concerning Accreditation of Study Programs and Higher Education. The purpose of this study was to analyze comprehensive higher education performance measurements. This research method uses the Academic Scorecard approach with the Analytical Hierarchy Process. The Academic Scorecard method used is a combination of Permenristekdikti Number 44 of 2015 in the form of determining from each cluster, while data processing uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process in the form of decision making with several criteria. The results of the research are the level of importance of Academic Management Perspective of 16.79%, Stakeholder Perspective 19.73%, Internal Business Process Perspective 57.45%, and Innovation and Learning Perspective 55.52%. Meanwhile, from the Academic Scorecard, the perspective attainment level reached 41.72%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Fifth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)\",\"volume\":\"51 Suppl 53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Fifth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIC50835.2020.9288628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Fifth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIC50835.2020.9288628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

高等教育在教育国民生活中具有重要作用。高等教育管理过程必须具有根据2015年关于国家高等教育标准的第44号Permenristekdikti确定的标准化。为了实现高等教育绩效的质量,有必要根据2016年关于学习计划和高等教育认证的Permenristekdikti第32号法令对学习计划和高等教育的认证进行排名。本研究的目的是分析综合高等教育绩效测量。本研究方法采用学术记分卡方法和层次分析法。使用的学术记分卡方法是2015年Permenristekdikti第44号的组合,以每个集群的形式进行确定,而数据处理则使用层次分析法(analytic Hierarchy Process)以若干标准的决策形式进行决策。研究结果显示,学术管理视角的重要性为16.79%,利益相关者视角为19.73%,内部业务流程视角为57.45%,创新与学习视角为55.52%。与此同时,从学业计分卡来看,学生的视角素养水平达到41.72%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Higher Education Performance Measurement Using Academic Scorecard and Analytical Hierarchy Process
Higher education has an important role in educating the nation's life through education. The higher education management process must have a standardization that has been determined in accordance with Permenristekdikti Number 44 of 2015 concerning National Higher Education Standards. To achieve the quality of higher education performance, it is necessary to rank the accreditation of study programs and higher education according to Permenristekdikti Number 32 of 2016 concerning Accreditation of Study Programs and Higher Education. The purpose of this study was to analyze comprehensive higher education performance measurements. This research method uses the Academic Scorecard approach with the Analytical Hierarchy Process. The Academic Scorecard method used is a combination of Permenristekdikti Number 44 of 2015 in the form of determining from each cluster, while data processing uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process in the form of decision making with several criteria. The results of the research are the level of importance of Academic Management Perspective of 16.79%, Stakeholder Perspective 19.73%, Internal Business Process Perspective 57.45%, and Innovation and Learning Perspective 55.52%. Meanwhile, from the Academic Scorecard, the perspective attainment level reached 41.72%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信