教育实验工作的概念——形成性实验的思想

Iu.V. Gromyko, V. Davydov
{"title":"教育实验工作的概念——形成性实验的思想","authors":"Iu.V. Gromyko, V. Davydov","doi":"10.2753/RPO1061-0405360472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experiment in education that is currently under way is, in a certain sense, not an experiment. Existing examples have not permitted an analysis from the standpoint of possible negative consequences. This sanction is due to wrong understanding of the conceptual component of the experiment, formulated as follows: \"One must not experiment on children.\" Understanding education has been reduced to exerting an effect on an individual, and its anthropological and sociocultural technology has been disregarded. It has now become obvious that education is a fundamental social and sociocultural technology determining the level of development of social production (see Iu.V. Gromyko & V.V. Davydov, [Education as a means for the formation and cultivation of the practice of socioregional development]. Russia — 2010, 1993, No. 1; [Sociocultural policy and socioregional development]. Russia — 2010, 1994, No. 1-2).","PeriodicalId":198083,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Russian and East European Psychology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Conception of Experimental Work in Education Ideas for a formative experiment\",\"authors\":\"Iu.V. Gromyko, V. Davydov\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/RPO1061-0405360472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The experiment in education that is currently under way is, in a certain sense, not an experiment. Existing examples have not permitted an analysis from the standpoint of possible negative consequences. This sanction is due to wrong understanding of the conceptual component of the experiment, formulated as follows: \\\"One must not experiment on children.\\\" Understanding education has been reduced to exerting an effect on an individual, and its anthropological and sociocultural technology has been disregarded. It has now become obvious that education is a fundamental social and sociocultural technology determining the level of development of social production (see Iu.V. Gromyko & V.V. Davydov, [Education as a means for the formation and cultivation of the practice of socioregional development]. Russia — 2010, 1993, No. 1; [Sociocultural policy and socioregional development]. Russia — 2010, 1994, No. 1-2).\",\"PeriodicalId\":198083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Russian and East European Psychology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Russian and East European Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405360472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Russian and East European Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405360472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从某种意义上说,目前正在进行的教育实验并不是一项实验。现有的例子不允许从可能的负面后果的角度进行分析。这种制裁是由于对实验的概念成分的错误理解,表述如下:“不能在儿童身上做实验。”对教育的理解被简化为对个人施加影响,其人类学和社会文化技术被忽视。现在已经很明显,教育是决定社会生产发展水平的一项基本的社会和社会文化技术。Gromyko & V.V. Davydov,[教育作为形成和培养社会区域发展实践的手段]。俄罗斯- 2010年,1993年,第一名;[社会文化政策与社会区域发展]。俄罗斯- 2010,1994,No. 1-2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Conception of Experimental Work in Education Ideas for a formative experiment
The experiment in education that is currently under way is, in a certain sense, not an experiment. Existing examples have not permitted an analysis from the standpoint of possible negative consequences. This sanction is due to wrong understanding of the conceptual component of the experiment, formulated as follows: "One must not experiment on children." Understanding education has been reduced to exerting an effect on an individual, and its anthropological and sociocultural technology has been disregarded. It has now become obvious that education is a fundamental social and sociocultural technology determining the level of development of social production (see Iu.V. Gromyko & V.V. Davydov, [Education as a means for the formation and cultivation of the practice of socioregional development]. Russia — 2010, 1993, No. 1; [Sociocultural policy and socioregional development]. Russia — 2010, 1994, No. 1-2).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信