箱子搬运过程中上臂和上背的姿势和动作

Helen Cristina Nogueira a, Francisco Locks a, Marylaine Costa b, José Hermosilla b, Ana Beatriz Oliveira a
{"title":"箱子搬运过程中上臂和上背的姿势和动作","authors":"Helen Cristina Nogueira a, Francisco Locks a, Marylaine Costa b, José Hermosilla b, Ana Beatriz Oliveira a","doi":"10.54941/ahfe100056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the lack of studies assessing biomechanical exposure during manual material handling (MMH) in real work environment, the aims of this study are: (1) describing postures and movements of the upper back and upper arms during MMH performed in a regular workday in a real setting; (2) comparing postures and movements according to height level of the MMH; and (3) investigating the relationship between postures/movements and the workers’ experience. Fourteen workers (28.14 ± 6.73 years) from the distribution sector of an automotive factory were evaluated during four hours of their regular work. Three workers who presented more than five years performing MMH tasks were considered as expert (6.33 ± 0.57 years of experience in MMH tasks). Eleven workers were classified as novices (1.24 ± 0.78 years). Postures and movements of upper back and upper arms were measured using inclinometers. APDF percentiles (10th, 50th, and 90th) were obtained for angles and angular velocities. All data were descriptively analyzed and a one-way ANOVA was performed in order to compare biomechanical exposure during MMH tasks performed in three different, and most adopted, heights (floor, chest and shoulder levels). Pearson correlation test was applied to investigate the association between experience and biomechanical exposure variables. Alfa level was set at 0.05. In general, the descriptive analyses showed no expressive difference between expert and novice workers. Significant statistical differences in upper back and upper arms posture and movement among the three most frequent handling heights were found. Moreover, there was a positive and significant correlation between workers’ experience and humeral elevation. Despite the limited number of workers, we could evaluate what in fact happen in real settings. We believe that the evaluation of larger samples would demonstrate differences between expert and novice workers also in real settings, as we could observe a tendency of safer strategies among experienced workers. The challenge is finding larger groups of workers doing MMH tasks considering the lean production systems.","PeriodicalId":134696,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors: Part II","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postures and Movements of Upper Arms and Upper Back During Box Handling in Real Setting\",\"authors\":\"Helen Cristina Nogueira a, Francisco Locks a, Marylaine Costa b, José Hermosilla b, Ana Beatriz Oliveira a\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe100056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Considering the lack of studies assessing biomechanical exposure during manual material handling (MMH) in real work environment, the aims of this study are: (1) describing postures and movements of the upper back and upper arms during MMH performed in a regular workday in a real setting; (2) comparing postures and movements according to height level of the MMH; and (3) investigating the relationship between postures/movements and the workers’ experience. Fourteen workers (28.14 ± 6.73 years) from the distribution sector of an automotive factory were evaluated during four hours of their regular work. Three workers who presented more than five years performing MMH tasks were considered as expert (6.33 ± 0.57 years of experience in MMH tasks). Eleven workers were classified as novices (1.24 ± 0.78 years). Postures and movements of upper back and upper arms were measured using inclinometers. APDF percentiles (10th, 50th, and 90th) were obtained for angles and angular velocities. All data were descriptively analyzed and a one-way ANOVA was performed in order to compare biomechanical exposure during MMH tasks performed in three different, and most adopted, heights (floor, chest and shoulder levels). Pearson correlation test was applied to investigate the association between experience and biomechanical exposure variables. Alfa level was set at 0.05. In general, the descriptive analyses showed no expressive difference between expert and novice workers. Significant statistical differences in upper back and upper arms posture and movement among the three most frequent handling heights were found. Moreover, there was a positive and significant correlation between workers’ experience and humeral elevation. Despite the limited number of workers, we could evaluate what in fact happen in real settings. We believe that the evaluation of larger samples would demonstrate differences between expert and novice workers also in real settings, as we could observe a tendency of safer strategies among experienced workers. The challenge is finding larger groups of workers doing MMH tasks considering the lean production systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors: Part II\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors: Part II\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe100056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors: Part II","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe100056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到缺乏评估真实工作环境下手工搬运过程中生物力学暴露的研究,本研究的目的是:(1)描述在真实环境下正常工作日进行手工搬运过程中上背部和上臂的姿势和运动;(2)根据MMH的高度水平比较姿态和动作;(3)研究姿势/动作与工人体验的关系。对某汽车工厂流通部门的14名工人(28.14±6.73岁)进行了4小时的正常工作考核。3名完成MMH任务5年以上的工人被认为是专家(6.33±0.57年MMH任务经验)。新手11人(1.24±0.78岁)。用倾斜仪测量上背部和上臂的姿势和运动。获得角度和角速度的APDF百分位数(第10、50和90)。对所有数据进行描述性分析,并进行单因素方差分析,以比较在三种不同且最常用的高度(地板、胸部和肩部水平)执行MMH任务时的生物力学暴露。应用Pearson相关检验探讨经验与生物力学暴露变量之间的关系。α水平设为0.05。总体而言,描述性分析显示熟练工人和新手工人之间没有表达差异。在三个最常见的搬运高度之间,上背部和上臂的姿势和运动有显著的统计学差异。此外,工人的经验与肱骨抬高之间存在显著的正相关。尽管工作人员的数量有限,但我们可以评估真实环境中实际发生的情况。我们相信,更大样本的评估将显示专家和新手工人之间的差异,也在实际设置中,因为我们可以观察到有经验的工人更安全的策略的趋势。考虑到精益生产系统,挑战在于找到更大的工人群体来完成MMH任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postures and Movements of Upper Arms and Upper Back During Box Handling in Real Setting
Considering the lack of studies assessing biomechanical exposure during manual material handling (MMH) in real work environment, the aims of this study are: (1) describing postures and movements of the upper back and upper arms during MMH performed in a regular workday in a real setting; (2) comparing postures and movements according to height level of the MMH; and (3) investigating the relationship between postures/movements and the workers’ experience. Fourteen workers (28.14 ± 6.73 years) from the distribution sector of an automotive factory were evaluated during four hours of their regular work. Three workers who presented more than five years performing MMH tasks were considered as expert (6.33 ± 0.57 years of experience in MMH tasks). Eleven workers were classified as novices (1.24 ± 0.78 years). Postures and movements of upper back and upper arms were measured using inclinometers. APDF percentiles (10th, 50th, and 90th) were obtained for angles and angular velocities. All data were descriptively analyzed and a one-way ANOVA was performed in order to compare biomechanical exposure during MMH tasks performed in three different, and most adopted, heights (floor, chest and shoulder levels). Pearson correlation test was applied to investigate the association between experience and biomechanical exposure variables. Alfa level was set at 0.05. In general, the descriptive analyses showed no expressive difference between expert and novice workers. Significant statistical differences in upper back and upper arms posture and movement among the three most frequent handling heights were found. Moreover, there was a positive and significant correlation between workers’ experience and humeral elevation. Despite the limited number of workers, we could evaluate what in fact happen in real settings. We believe that the evaluation of larger samples would demonstrate differences between expert and novice workers also in real settings, as we could observe a tendency of safer strategies among experienced workers. The challenge is finding larger groups of workers doing MMH tasks considering the lean production systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信