水平和垂直列表控件的HCI性能评估

Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference. OzCHI'98 (Cat. No.98EX234) Pub Date : 1998-11-29 DOI:10.1109/OZCHI.1998.732232

S. Wallace, D. Weber, J. Warren

{"title":"水平和垂直列表控件的HCI性能评估","authors":"S. Wallace, D. Weber, J. Warren","doi":"10.1109/OZCHI.1998.732232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microsoft Windows 95 uses both vertical arrangements of items in lists and horizontal groupings of smaller vertical lists. This paper reports the results of an experiment to evaluate selection times using horizontal and vertical lists. Two GOMS (Goals, Operators, Methods, Selection rules) models were developed to predict differences. There was no significant difference in selection times, but the results showed interesting trends in learning behaviour.","PeriodicalId":322019,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference. OzCHI'98 (Cat. No.98EX234)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HCI performance evaluation of horizontal and vertical list controls\",\"authors\":\"S. Wallace, D. Weber, J. Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OZCHI.1998.732232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Microsoft Windows 95 uses both vertical arrangements of items in lists and horizontal groupings of smaller vertical lists. This paper reports the results of an experiment to evaluate selection times using horizontal and vertical lists. Two GOMS (Goals, Operators, Methods, Selection rules) models were developed to predict differences. There was no significant difference in selection times, but the results showed interesting trends in learning behaviour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference. OzCHI'98 (Cat. No.98EX234)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference. OzCHI'98 (Cat. No.98EX234)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/OZCHI.1998.732232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference. OzCHI'98 (Cat. No.98EX234)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OZCHI.1998.732232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

Microsoft Windows 95既使用垂直排列列表中的项目，也使用较小垂直列表的水平分组。本文报告了使用水平和垂直列表评估选择时间的实验结果。开发了两个GOMS(目标，操作符，方法，选择规则)模型来预测差异。在选择时间上没有显著差异，但结果显示了学习行为的有趣趋势。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

HCI performance evaluation of horizontal and vertical list controls

Microsoft Windows 95 uses both vertical arrangements of items in lists and horizontal groupings of smaller vertical lists. This paper reports the results of an experiment to evaluate selection times using horizontal and vertical lists. Two GOMS (Goals, Operators, Methods, Selection rules) models were developed to predict differences. There was no significant difference in selection times, but the results showed interesting trends in learning behaviour.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference. OzCHI'98 (Cat. No.98EX234)

自引率

0.00%

发文量