女性主义、道德与堕胎权:印度与美国的比较研究

Manasvi Gupta
{"title":"女性主义、道德与堕胎权:印度与美国的比较研究","authors":"Manasvi Gupta","doi":"10.55662/salrj.2022.804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women’s movement have led to liberalization of rights of women. A women’s body and her reproductive system is her own right. But this is a pretence when we talk of women’s right in regards to abortion. Amongst the moral and legal debates of abortion, the legislature and activists forget the rights of a women and her decision of abortion. Her privacy is violated and denied. The subject of her right over her own body and the choice she makes is condemned and over shadowed by a false sense of justice. In American Jurisprudence, had legalized abortion in the United States of America and secured the rights of women over their own body. But today there is a demand to over-rule this judgement by the anti-abortion law activists. It is sad to deduce that the courts that have supported the rights of women are now once again faced with the jurisprudential question of morality and law in regards to abortion laws. The research analyses the dimension of feminism in relation to comparative studies of the present statutes governing abortion laws in USA and India.","PeriodicalId":131737,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Law Review Journal","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feminism, Morality and Abortion Rights: A Comparative Study of India and USA\",\"authors\":\"Manasvi Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.55662/salrj.2022.804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Women’s movement have led to liberalization of rights of women. A women’s body and her reproductive system is her own right. But this is a pretence when we talk of women’s right in regards to abortion. Amongst the moral and legal debates of abortion, the legislature and activists forget the rights of a women and her decision of abortion. Her privacy is violated and denied. The subject of her right over her own body and the choice she makes is condemned and over shadowed by a false sense of justice. In American Jurisprudence, had legalized abortion in the United States of America and secured the rights of women over their own body. But today there is a demand to over-rule this judgement by the anti-abortion law activists. It is sad to deduce that the courts that have supported the rights of women are now once again faced with the jurisprudential question of morality and law in regards to abortion laws. The research analyses the dimension of feminism in relation to comparative studies of the present statutes governing abortion laws in USA and India.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian Law Review Journal\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian Law Review Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55662/salrj.2022.804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Law Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55662/salrj.2022.804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

妇女运动导致了妇女权利的自由化。女性的身体和生殖系统是她自己的权利。但当我们谈到妇女在堕胎方面的权利时,这是一种借口。在关于堕胎的道德和法律辩论中,立法机构和活动家忘记了妇女的权利和她对堕胎的决定。她的隐私遭到侵犯和否认。她对自己身体的权利和她所做的选择的主题被一种错误的正义感所谴责和笼罩。在美国法理学中,他使美国的堕胎合法化,并保障了妇女对自己身体的权利。但今天,反堕胎法活动家要求推翻这一判决。令人遗憾的是,曾经支持妇女权利的法院现在再次面临与堕胎法有关的道德和法律的法学问题。本研究通过对美国和印度现行堕胎法的比较研究,分析了女权主义的维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feminism, Morality and Abortion Rights: A Comparative Study of India and USA
Women’s movement have led to liberalization of rights of women. A women’s body and her reproductive system is her own right. But this is a pretence when we talk of women’s right in regards to abortion. Amongst the moral and legal debates of abortion, the legislature and activists forget the rights of a women and her decision of abortion. Her privacy is violated and denied. The subject of her right over her own body and the choice she makes is condemned and over shadowed by a false sense of justice. In American Jurisprudence, had legalized abortion in the United States of America and secured the rights of women over their own body. But today there is a demand to over-rule this judgement by the anti-abortion law activists. It is sad to deduce that the courts that have supported the rights of women are now once again faced with the jurisprudential question of morality and law in regards to abortion laws. The research analyses the dimension of feminism in relation to comparative studies of the present statutes governing abortion laws in USA and India.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信