教育科学、智力测试和智力意识形态

Barry Down
{"title":"教育科学、智力测试和智力意识形态","authors":"Barry Down","doi":"10.1080/17508480609556445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Australia, 'testing mania' currently dominates the conservative Coalition Government's educational agenda. The current Minister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Dr Kemp, argues that comprehensive reporting based on standardised testing 'is a necessary concomitant of informed parental choice'. In his view, there are 'direct connections between low levels of literacy, behavioural problems in the classroom, the likelihood that a student will finish formal education before Year 12, and the likelihood of being unemployed after leaving school'. This new testing culture is evident in the development and implementation of the national literacy surveys, the various State-based standardised tests (Basic Skills Test) and the national literacy and numeracy benchmarks. As Apple reminds us, such initiatives cannot be divorced from the broader 'conservative restoration' (privatisation, centralisation, vocationaiisation, and difFerentiation) advocated by the political right and proponents of the back-to-basics movement such as Kemp. What we are witnessing, in the words of Welch, 'is a moral-political campaign to wrest control of society from supporters of tolerance, difference and democratic selfexpression and return it to those who hanker for a more monolithic, certain and authoritarian world'.","PeriodicalId":347655,"journal":{"name":"Melbourne Studies in Education","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational science, mental testing, and the ideology of intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Barry Down\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17508480609556445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Australia, 'testing mania' currently dominates the conservative Coalition Government's educational agenda. The current Minister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Dr Kemp, argues that comprehensive reporting based on standardised testing 'is a necessary concomitant of informed parental choice'. In his view, there are 'direct connections between low levels of literacy, behavioural problems in the classroom, the likelihood that a student will finish formal education before Year 12, and the likelihood of being unemployed after leaving school'. This new testing culture is evident in the development and implementation of the national literacy surveys, the various State-based standardised tests (Basic Skills Test) and the national literacy and numeracy benchmarks. As Apple reminds us, such initiatives cannot be divorced from the broader 'conservative restoration' (privatisation, centralisation, vocationaiisation, and difFerentiation) advocated by the political right and proponents of the back-to-basics movement such as Kemp. What we are witnessing, in the words of Welch, 'is a moral-political campaign to wrest control of society from supporters of tolerance, difference and democratic selfexpression and return it to those who hanker for a more monolithic, certain and authoritarian world'.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melbourne Studies in Education\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melbourne Studies in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480609556445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melbourne Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480609556445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在澳大利亚,“考试狂热”目前主导着保守的联合政府的教育议程。现任教育、培训和青年事务部长肯普博士认为,基于标准化测试的全面报告“是家长明智选择的必要伴随”。在他看来,“文化水平低、课堂行为问题、学生在12年级之前完成正规教育的可能性以及毕业后失业的可能性之间存在直接联系”。这种新的考试文化在制定和实施全国扫盲调查、各种以国家为基础的标准化考试(基本技能考试)以及全国扫盲和算术基准方面表现得很明显。正如苹果公司提醒我们的那样,这些举措不能与政治权利和坎普等回归基本运动的支持者所倡导的更广泛的“保守恢复”(私有化、集中化、职业化和差异化)分开。用韦尔奇的话来说,我们正在目睹的是“一场道德政治运动,旨在从宽容、差异和民主自我表达的支持者手中夺取对社会的控制,并将其归还给那些渴望一个更单一、更确定、更专制的世界的人”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Educational science, mental testing, and the ideology of intelligence
In Australia, 'testing mania' currently dominates the conservative Coalition Government's educational agenda. The current Minister for Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Dr Kemp, argues that comprehensive reporting based on standardised testing 'is a necessary concomitant of informed parental choice'. In his view, there are 'direct connections between low levels of literacy, behavioural problems in the classroom, the likelihood that a student will finish formal education before Year 12, and the likelihood of being unemployed after leaving school'. This new testing culture is evident in the development and implementation of the national literacy surveys, the various State-based standardised tests (Basic Skills Test) and the national literacy and numeracy benchmarks. As Apple reminds us, such initiatives cannot be divorced from the broader 'conservative restoration' (privatisation, centralisation, vocationaiisation, and difFerentiation) advocated by the political right and proponents of the back-to-basics movement such as Kemp. What we are witnessing, in the words of Welch, 'is a moral-political campaign to wrest control of society from supporters of tolerance, difference and democratic selfexpression and return it to those who hanker for a more monolithic, certain and authoritarian world'.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信