法院覆核判决

Hugo D. Lodge
{"title":"法院覆核判决","authors":"Hugo D. Lodge","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198844778.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior to the 2018 Act, most sanctions in force in the UK derived from EU law, including sanctions decided at UN level but implemented by EU regulations. Prior to Brexit, UK courts frequently took the view that the correct venue for challenging sanctions was therefore elsewhere, e.g. the EU Courts.","PeriodicalId":304757,"journal":{"name":"Blackstone’s Guide to The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Court Review of Decisions\",\"authors\":\"Hugo D. Lodge\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780198844778.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prior to the 2018 Act, most sanctions in force in the UK derived from EU law, including sanctions decided at UN level but implemented by EU regulations. Prior to Brexit, UK courts frequently took the view that the correct venue for challenging sanctions was therefore elsewhere, e.g. the EU Courts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blackstone’s Guide to The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blackstone’s Guide to The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198844778.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blackstone’s Guide to The Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198844778.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2018年法案之前,英国实施的大多数制裁源自欧盟法律,包括在联合国层面决定但由欧盟法规实施的制裁。在英国脱欧之前,英国法院经常认为,挑战制裁的正确地点是在其他地方,例如欧盟法院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Court Review of Decisions
Prior to the 2018 Act, most sanctions in force in the UK derived from EU law, including sanctions decided at UN level but implemented by EU regulations. Prior to Brexit, UK courts frequently took the view that the correct venue for challenging sanctions was therefore elsewhere, e.g. the EU Courts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信