公司治理:东亚风格——中国、日本、韩国、台湾地区公司治理典型决定因素的文献研究

Juergen Noll, Yannic Diefenbach, Miriam Ji Hyun Kim Park
{"title":"公司治理:东亚风格——中国、日本、韩国、台湾地区公司治理典型决定因素的文献研究","authors":"Juergen Noll, Yannic Diefenbach, Miriam Ji Hyun Kim Park","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2733703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The basis of this paper is provided by the issue of Globerman, Peng, & Shapiro (2011). They have summarized and identified five common features for Asian corporate governance. Any good corporate governance system should work towards improving managerial performance while satisfying shareholders’ interest and increase firm value. Of course, many aspects of Asian corporate governance differ from American and western countries’ corporate governance. Because of past historic events we believe that especially China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan share a common understanding of “doing business”. The goal of this paper, therefore, is to discuss and examine the distinguished features of Corporate Governance described by Globerman at al. (2011) in those four countries. Furthermore, we also add the role of banks with regard to monitoring and improved corporate governance.All four countries reveal tendencies towards a concentrated ownership structure and a significant role of family ownership. All countries, except China (for which data is not sufficient), have a considerable level of cross- and pyramidal ownership structures. But there is no clear tendency and common ground concerning state ownership, limited use of professional managers and the role of banks in those four countries.","PeriodicalId":354906,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Comparative eJournal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Governance: East Asian Style - A Literature Study on Typical Determinants of Corporate Governance in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"Juergen Noll, Yannic Diefenbach, Miriam Ji Hyun Kim Park\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2733703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The basis of this paper is provided by the issue of Globerman, Peng, & Shapiro (2011). They have summarized and identified five common features for Asian corporate governance. Any good corporate governance system should work towards improving managerial performance while satisfying shareholders’ interest and increase firm value. Of course, many aspects of Asian corporate governance differ from American and western countries’ corporate governance. Because of past historic events we believe that especially China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan share a common understanding of “doing business”. The goal of this paper, therefore, is to discuss and examine the distinguished features of Corporate Governance described by Globerman at al. (2011) in those four countries. Furthermore, we also add the role of banks with regard to monitoring and improved corporate governance.All four countries reveal tendencies towards a concentrated ownership structure and a significant role of family ownership. All countries, except China (for which data is not sufficient), have a considerable level of cross- and pyramidal ownership structures. But there is no clear tendency and common ground concerning state ownership, limited use of professional managers and the role of banks in those four countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance: Comparative eJournal\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance: Comparative eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2733703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Comparative eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2733703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的基础是Globerman, Peng, & Shapiro(2011)的问题。他们总结并确定了亚洲公司治理的五个共同特征。任何良好的公司治理制度都应该在满足股东利益和增加公司价值的同时,努力提高管理绩效。当然,亚洲公司治理的许多方面与美国和西方国家的公司治理有所不同。由于过去的历史事件,我们相信,特别是中国、日本、韩国和台湾对“做生意”有着共同的理解。因此,本文的目的是讨论和研究Globerman等人(2011)在这四个国家描述的公司治理的显著特征。此外,我们还增加了银行在监督和改善公司治理方面的作用。所有四个国家都显示出集中所有权结构的趋势和家庭所有权的重要作用。除了中国(数据不充分),所有国家都有相当程度的交叉和金字塔所有制结构。但在这四个国家,在国有制、有限使用职业经理人和银行的作用方面,没有明显的趋势和共同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corporate Governance: East Asian Style - A Literature Study on Typical Determinants of Corporate Governance in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan
The basis of this paper is provided by the issue of Globerman, Peng, & Shapiro (2011). They have summarized and identified five common features for Asian corporate governance. Any good corporate governance system should work towards improving managerial performance while satisfying shareholders’ interest and increase firm value. Of course, many aspects of Asian corporate governance differ from American and western countries’ corporate governance. Because of past historic events we believe that especially China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan share a common understanding of “doing business”. The goal of this paper, therefore, is to discuss and examine the distinguished features of Corporate Governance described by Globerman at al. (2011) in those four countries. Furthermore, we also add the role of banks with regard to monitoring and improved corporate governance.All four countries reveal tendencies towards a concentrated ownership structure and a significant role of family ownership. All countries, except China (for which data is not sufficient), have a considerable level of cross- and pyramidal ownership structures. But there is no clear tendency and common ground concerning state ownership, limited use of professional managers and the role of banks in those four countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信