机器美学

P. Goodfellow
{"title":"机器美学","authors":"P. Goodfellow","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1wdvxbt.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Machine Aesthetic is a curated national touring exhibition which took place at Gallery North, Newcastle; The Gallery@AUB, Bournemouth, ProjectSpacePlus, Lincoln, The Gallery@NUA, Norwich and Transition Gallery, London, curated by Eric Butcher and Simon Granell. The show featured work from Paul Goodfellow, Andrew Bracey, Eric Butcher, David Connearn, Robert Currie,Simon Granell, Emma Hart, Dan Hays, Natasha Kidd, Tim Knowles, and Michael Roberts \n \n'From the first daubings of pre-historic caves, through the invention of the camera obscura and ready-made oil paint in tubes, to the use of digital media, artists have been among the first to embrace and exploit new technologies. The focus of A Machine Aesthetic, however, is at once narrower and broader, concerning itself specifically with the notion and implications of ‘mechanisation’ in its widest sense in contemporary art. \n \nSince the late 1950/early 60s there have evolved a plethora of artistic practices which, for reasons as various as the practitioners themselves, involve the manufacture of machines to produce the artistic ‘product’. Where Jean Tinguely led the way, artists as diverse as Rebecca Horn, Chris Burden, Roxy Paine and Damien Hirst followed. But these analyses have tended to conceive of the machine in a narrow sense. And while this conception has its part to play in A Machine Aesthetic, a more illuminating perspective can be achieved by consideration of the full range of artistic practices that embrace more subtle and sophisticated notions of mechanisation. \n \nContemporary fine art practice engages with the notion of mechanisation in a sophisticated range of ways; from artists who exploit the materials, processes and techniques of machine production, incorporating machined materials into their work, to those who do not engage physically with machines at all, but adopt a mechanised methodology in the process of manufacture, disciplining their minds and bodies to behave like machines. The latter approach recognises and exploits the extent to which the human condition is predicated upon mechanisation, but acknowledges that we are only part machine. Artists make machines to make their work for them, the creative act being pushed one or more steps from the actual moment of production, raising fundamental questions concerning the status and primacy of the creative act and the relationship between it and the art object. In some cases the ‘art machine’ is the art object. \n \nIn addition, the notion of mechanisation may refer to the process of the reception of the art object by the viewer. The demands that some works of art make on the viewer in their apprehension can be formidable. The manner of a work’s execution may demand an analogously mechanistic process in its apprehension. \n \nA Machine Aesthetic: The role of mechanisation in contemporary artistic practice, divided into four parts (Machined Components, Behaving like Machines, Mechanised Processes, Art Machines), attempts to explore the various manifestations, uses and influences of different aspects of mechanisation within the practice of a diverse range of contemporary artists'. \n \nText: Eric Butcher & Simon Granell","PeriodicalId":147977,"journal":{"name":"Moving Pictures and Renaissance Art History","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Machine Aesthetic\",\"authors\":\"P. Goodfellow\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1wdvxbt.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Machine Aesthetic is a curated national touring exhibition which took place at Gallery North, Newcastle; The Gallery@AUB, Bournemouth, ProjectSpacePlus, Lincoln, The Gallery@NUA, Norwich and Transition Gallery, London, curated by Eric Butcher and Simon Granell. The show featured work from Paul Goodfellow, Andrew Bracey, Eric Butcher, David Connearn, Robert Currie,Simon Granell, Emma Hart, Dan Hays, Natasha Kidd, Tim Knowles, and Michael Roberts \\n \\n'From the first daubings of pre-historic caves, through the invention of the camera obscura and ready-made oil paint in tubes, to the use of digital media, artists have been among the first to embrace and exploit new technologies. The focus of A Machine Aesthetic, however, is at once narrower and broader, concerning itself specifically with the notion and implications of ‘mechanisation’ in its widest sense in contemporary art. \\n \\nSince the late 1950/early 60s there have evolved a plethora of artistic practices which, for reasons as various as the practitioners themselves, involve the manufacture of machines to produce the artistic ‘product’. Where Jean Tinguely led the way, artists as diverse as Rebecca Horn, Chris Burden, Roxy Paine and Damien Hirst followed. But these analyses have tended to conceive of the machine in a narrow sense. And while this conception has its part to play in A Machine Aesthetic, a more illuminating perspective can be achieved by consideration of the full range of artistic practices that embrace more subtle and sophisticated notions of mechanisation. \\n \\nContemporary fine art practice engages with the notion of mechanisation in a sophisticated range of ways; from artists who exploit the materials, processes and techniques of machine production, incorporating machined materials into their work, to those who do not engage physically with machines at all, but adopt a mechanised methodology in the process of manufacture, disciplining their minds and bodies to behave like machines. The latter approach recognises and exploits the extent to which the human condition is predicated upon mechanisation, but acknowledges that we are only part machine. Artists make machines to make their work for them, the creative act being pushed one or more steps from the actual moment of production, raising fundamental questions concerning the status and primacy of the creative act and the relationship between it and the art object. In some cases the ‘art machine’ is the art object. \\n \\nIn addition, the notion of mechanisation may refer to the process of the reception of the art object by the viewer. The demands that some works of art make on the viewer in their apprehension can be formidable. The manner of a work’s execution may demand an analogously mechanistic process in its apprehension. \\n \\nA Machine Aesthetic: The role of mechanisation in contemporary artistic practice, divided into four parts (Machined Components, Behaving like Machines, Mechanised Processes, Art Machines), attempts to explore the various manifestations, uses and influences of different aspects of mechanisation within the practice of a diverse range of contemporary artists'. \\n \\nText: Eric Butcher & Simon Granell\",\"PeriodicalId\":147977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Moving Pictures and Renaissance Art History\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Moving Pictures and Renaissance Art History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1wdvxbt.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moving Pictures and Renaissance Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1wdvxbt.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器美学是一个策划的全国巡回展览,发生在画廊北,纽卡斯尔;Gallery@AUB,伯恩茅斯,ProjectSpacePlus,林肯,Gallery@NUA,诺维奇和过渡画廊,伦敦,由埃里克·布彻和西蒙·格拉纳尔策划。展览展示了Paul Goodfellow、Andrew Bracey、Eric Butcher、David Connearn、Robert Currie、Simon Granell、Emma Hart、Dan Hays、Natasha Kidd、Tim Knowles和Michael Roberts的作品。从第一次对史前洞穴的涂画,到发明暗箱和现成的油彩管,再到数字媒体的使用,艺术家们一直是第一批拥抱和利用新技术的人。然而,《机器美学》的焦点是既狭窄又广泛的,它特别关注当代艺术中最广泛意义上的“机械化”的概念和含义。自20世纪50年代末/ 60年代初以来,出现了大量的艺术实践,由于从业者自身的各种原因,涉及到制造机器来生产艺术“产品”。让·廷格利引领潮流,丽贝卡·霍恩、克里斯·伯顿、罗克西·潘恩和达米安·赫斯特等形形色色的艺术家紧随其后。但是,这些分析倾向于从狭义上理解机器。虽然这一概念在《机器美学》中发挥了作用,但通过考虑包含更微妙和复杂的机械化概念的全方位艺术实践,可以获得更具启发性的视角。当代美术实践以复杂的方式与机械化的概念相结合;从利用机器生产的材料、工艺和技术,将机械材料融入他们的作品的艺术家,到那些根本不与机器接触,而是在制造过程中采用机械化方法,训练他们的思想和身体像机器一样行动的艺术家。后一种方法承认并利用了人类状况在多大程度上取决于机械化,但承认我们只是部分机器。艺术家制造机器来为他们制作作品,创造性行为从实际的生产时刻被推进了一个或多个步骤,提出了关于创造性行为的地位和首要地位以及它与艺术对象之间关系的基本问题。在某些情况下,“艺术机器”就是艺术对象。此外,机械化的概念可能指的是观众接受艺术对象的过程。一些艺术作品在观赏者的理解上提出的要求可能是令人生畏的。一个作品的执行方式可能需要一个类似的机械过程来理解它。机器美学:机械化在当代艺术实践中的作用,分为四个部分(机械部件、像机器一样的行为、机械化过程、艺术机器),试图探索机械化在不同当代艺术家实践中的不同表现形式、使用和影响。文本:埃里克·布彻和西蒙·格拉纳尔
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Machine Aesthetic
A Machine Aesthetic is a curated national touring exhibition which took place at Gallery North, Newcastle; The Gallery@AUB, Bournemouth, ProjectSpacePlus, Lincoln, The Gallery@NUA, Norwich and Transition Gallery, London, curated by Eric Butcher and Simon Granell. The show featured work from Paul Goodfellow, Andrew Bracey, Eric Butcher, David Connearn, Robert Currie,Simon Granell, Emma Hart, Dan Hays, Natasha Kidd, Tim Knowles, and Michael Roberts 'From the first daubings of pre-historic caves, through the invention of the camera obscura and ready-made oil paint in tubes, to the use of digital media, artists have been among the first to embrace and exploit new technologies. The focus of A Machine Aesthetic, however, is at once narrower and broader, concerning itself specifically with the notion and implications of ‘mechanisation’ in its widest sense in contemporary art. Since the late 1950/early 60s there have evolved a plethora of artistic practices which, for reasons as various as the practitioners themselves, involve the manufacture of machines to produce the artistic ‘product’. Where Jean Tinguely led the way, artists as diverse as Rebecca Horn, Chris Burden, Roxy Paine and Damien Hirst followed. But these analyses have tended to conceive of the machine in a narrow sense. And while this conception has its part to play in A Machine Aesthetic, a more illuminating perspective can be achieved by consideration of the full range of artistic practices that embrace more subtle and sophisticated notions of mechanisation. Contemporary fine art practice engages with the notion of mechanisation in a sophisticated range of ways; from artists who exploit the materials, processes and techniques of machine production, incorporating machined materials into their work, to those who do not engage physically with machines at all, but adopt a mechanised methodology in the process of manufacture, disciplining their minds and bodies to behave like machines. The latter approach recognises and exploits the extent to which the human condition is predicated upon mechanisation, but acknowledges that we are only part machine. Artists make machines to make their work for them, the creative act being pushed one or more steps from the actual moment of production, raising fundamental questions concerning the status and primacy of the creative act and the relationship between it and the art object. In some cases the ‘art machine’ is the art object. In addition, the notion of mechanisation may refer to the process of the reception of the art object by the viewer. The demands that some works of art make on the viewer in their apprehension can be formidable. The manner of a work’s execution may demand an analogously mechanistic process in its apprehension. A Machine Aesthetic: The role of mechanisation in contemporary artistic practice, divided into four parts (Machined Components, Behaving like Machines, Mechanised Processes, Art Machines), attempts to explore the various manifestations, uses and influences of different aspects of mechanisation within the practice of a diverse range of contemporary artists'. Text: Eric Butcher & Simon Granell
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信